Reviewed revenue-data platforms ranked by how often answers to the category's recommendation questions name or cite them, across three model APIs.
Sales intelligence
Sales intelligence engine disagreement by prompt
96.3%
Which sales tools are best for relationship intelligence, warm paths, job-change signals, account research, and seller workflows? ranks first
Cross engine brand disagreement
16
Prompts ranked
Sep 26
Snapshot recorded
2026 · Rotating schedule
3
Answers behind each row
From the OpenAI, Anthropic and Google model APIs
All 16 prompts by cross engine brand disagreement
Which sales tools are best for relationship intelligence, warm paths, job-change signals, account research, and seller workflows? leads at 96.3%; the middle of the board sits at 76.6%.
- Ahead of second place
- 3.7%
- Held by the top three
- 31%
- Middle of the board
- 76.6%
- Below half the leader
- 5 of 16
- 1Which sales tools are best for relationship intelligence, warm paths, job-change signals, account research, and seller workflows?96.3%
- 2Create a shortlist of sales intelligence vendors for a global revenue team consolidating contact data, intent, enrichment, and research.92.6%
- 3Compare sales intelligence platforms on coverage, accuracy, freshness, intent, workflows, integrations, compliance, APIs, and support.88.9%
- 4Which sales intelligence platforms best support a global enterprise with governance, territories, CRM administration, APIs, and usage controls?83.3%
- 5Which sales intelligence vendors are strongest for European prospecting with appropriate data provenance, privacy, and compliance controls?83.3%
- 6Which sales intelligence platforms are best for finding, researching, enriching, and prioritizing B2B accounts and contacts?81.0%
- 7Recommend a data enrichment platform that can combine multiple providers, waterfall lookups, AI research, scoring, and CRM workflows.80.6%
- 8Recommend a sales intelligence platform for account intent, website activity, buying-stage signals, prioritization, and CRM activation.77.8%
- 9What sales intelligence tool should a startup evaluate for useful coverage, fast setup, transparent cost, sequencing, and low administration?75.5%
- 10Recommend a B2B data provider with broad company and contact coverage, verified email and phone data, and measurable freshness.72.2%
- 11How should a buyer compare sales intelligence pricing across seats, credits, exports, enrichments, intent signals, APIs, and premium data?66.7%
- 12Compare how sales intelligence vendors source, score, timestamp, explain, and validate account and person-level buying intent.0.0%
- 13Create a blind proof-of-concept scorecard for measuring contact coverage, deliverability, phone accuracy, freshness, match rate, and bias.0.0%
- 14Which criteria expose data portability, contract, credit, and workflow lock-in risk when choosing a sales intelligence platform?0.0%
- 15Compare sales data vendors on provenance, lawful basis, consent, suppression, deletion, residency, auditability, and regional restrictions.0.0%
- 16When should a company consolidate prospect data, enrichment, intent, account research, scoring, and sequencing on one revenue platform?0.0%
The prompt boards are re-run in rotation, about one category a day, so each board refreshes every few weeks and shows the date of its snapshot.
leading brand consensus: 66.666667 on 9 of 16 rows · leading brand owned citation gap: 0 on 8 of 16 rows · 3 checks behind each row.
Compare brands
One brand against up to three competitors, answer by answer
50.0%
of these answers name or cite ZoomInfo
24 of 48 answers
42.1%
Its share of the compared brands' appearances
15
Answers citing its own site
16 links to its domains
3 of 3
Model APIs that name it
| Brand | Named or cited | Against primary | Share of compared | Mentions | Answers citing it | Links to its site | Model APIs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZoomInfozoominfo.com | 50.0%24 of 48 | Primary | 42.1% | 41 | 15 | 16 | 3 of 3 |
| Apollo.ioapollo.io | 35.4%17 of 48 | -14.6 pts | 29.8% | 26 | 4 | 4 | 3 of 3 |
| Cognismcognism.com | 25.0%12 of 48 | -25.0 pts | 21.1% | 16 | 0 | 0 | 2 of 3 |
| LinkedIn Sales Navigatorlinkedin.com | 8.3%4 of 48 | -41.7 pts | 7.0% | 6 | 1 | 1 | 2 of 3 |
Every answer
Which compared brands each answer names
| Question | OpenAIopenai/gpt-4o-mini | Anthropicanthropic/claude-haiku-4-5 | Geminigoogle/gemini-2.5-flash |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01Which sales intelligence platforms are best for finding, researching, enriching, and prioritizing B2B accounts and contacts?Recommendation | ZoomInfo, cited 1Apollo.ioCognism 6 sources aa279217 | None named 0 sources 812f37aa | ZoomInfoApollo.ioCognism 9 sources 8f0bd0b6 |
| 02Recommend a B2B data provider with broad company and contact coverage, verified email and phone data, and measurable freshness.Recommendation | ZoomInfoApollo.ioCognism 9 sources 1dbe3fba | None named 0 sources 0277bd8f | ZoomInfoApollo.io, cited 1Cognism 7 sources 1e968806 |
| 03Which sales intelligence vendors are strongest for European prospecting with appropriate data provenance, privacy, and compliance controls?Recommendation | ZoomInfoApollo.ioCognism 3 sources bf6a36d3 | None named 0 sources 4700730e | ZoomInfo, cited 1 7 sources 5b8d4e52 |
| 04Recommend a sales intelligence platform for account intent, website activity, buying-stage signals, prioritization, and CRM activation.Recommendation | ZoomInfo 6 sources e6dd3b1f | None named 0 sources e7268628 | ZoomInfo, cited 1 6 sources 76aac321 |
| 05Which sales tools are best for relationship intelligence, warm paths, job-change signals, account research, and seller workflows?Recommendation | ZoomInfo, cited 2LinkedIn Sales Navigator, cited 1 6 sources 448e605c | None named 0 sources 5b0eddcc | ZoomInfoApollo.ioCognism 10 sources 6225c064 |
| 06Recommend a data enrichment platform that can combine multiple providers, waterfall lookups, AI research, scoring, and CRM workflows.Recommendation | ZoomInfo, cited 1Apollo.io 7 sources d60a576b | None named 0 sources 306d09d6 | ZoomInfoApollo.ioCognism 9 sources 959724e2 |
| 07Which sales intelligence platforms best support a global enterprise with governance, territories, CRM administration, APIs, and usage controls?Recommendation | ZoomInfo, cited 1Apollo.ioLinkedIn Sales NavigatorCognism 6 sources 50448806 | None named 0 sources 8ed9db84 | ZoomInfo, cited 1Apollo.ioCognism 7 sources c86bac51 |
| 08What sales intelligence tool should a startup evaluate for useful coverage, fast setup, transparent cost, sequencing, and low administration?Recommendation | ZoomInfoApollo.ioCognism 0 sources 5779940f | Apollo.io 0 sources 1a47f274 | ZoomInfo, cited 1Apollo.ioLinkedIn Sales Navigator 9 sources 1b289f80 |
| 09Compare sales intelligence platforms on coverage, accuracy, freshness, intent, workflows, integrations, compliance, APIs, and support.Commercial comparison | ZoomInfo, cited 1Apollo.ioLinkedIn Sales Navigator 5 sources cf1cf78b | None named 0 sources efb96883 | ZoomInfo, cited 1Apollo.io, cited 1Cognism 7 sources ff629be3 |
| 10How should a buyer compare sales intelligence pricing across seats, credits, exports, enrichments, intent signals, APIs, and premium data?Commercial comparison | None named 6 sources dda18cfd | None named 0 sources c20ccb76 | ZoomInfo, cited 1 6 sources dc9dafac |
| 11Create a blind proof-of-concept scorecard for measuring contact coverage, deliverability, phone accuracy, freshness, match rate, and bias.Commercial comparison | None named 0 sources 999787ef | None named 0 sources 781afed8 | None named 0 sources 34544234 |
| 12Compare how sales intelligence vendors source, score, timestamp, explain, and validate account and person-level buying intent.Commercial comparison | ZoomInfo, cited 1 10 sources 9e48d89c | ZoomInfo 0 sources 96ba1b03 | ZoomInfo, cited 1 7 sources 941b770e |
| 13Which criteria expose data portability, contract, credit, and workflow lock-in risk when choosing a sales intelligence platform?Commercial comparison | None named 3 sources 0256c991 | None named 0 sources c852c1f3 | None named 4 sources 1e6cd04e |
| 14Compare sales data vendors on provenance, lawful basis, consent, suppression, deletion, residency, auditability, and regional restrictions.Commercial comparison | None named 8 sources d5f9d200 | None named 0 sources d5f99540 | None named 8 sources cefe6a3f |
| 15Create a shortlist of sales intelligence vendors for a global revenue team consolidating contact data, intent, enrichment, and research.Commercial comparison | ZoomInfo, cited 1Apollo.io, cited 1 9 sources 18515bfc | None named 0 sources 741d6d02 | ZoomInfo, cited 1Apollo.io, cited 1Cognism 8 sources 35ed59b0 |
| 16When should a company consolidate prospect data, enrichment, intent, account research, scoring, and sequencing on one revenue platform?Commercial comparison | None named 6 sources d989123f | None named 0 sources 7ffe70dc | None named 10 sources 1b176f77 |
Sources
The sites these answers cite
| Site | Answers citing it | Distinct pages | Model APIs | Best position |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| pipeline.zoominfo.com | 15 | 9 | 2 | 1 |
| amplemarket.com | 12 | 5 | 2 | 1 |
| salesmotion.io | 7 | 5 | 2 | 1 |
| autobound.ai | 7 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| alpharun.com | 6 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| demandbase.com | 5 | 7 | 2 | 1 |
| marketsandmarkets.com | 5 | 4 | 2 | 2 |
| salesgenie.com | 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| rank.ai | 4 | 4 | 2 | 1 |
| apollo.io | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 |
| hginsights.com | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| monday.com | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| avoma.com | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| g2.com | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 |
| clay.com | 3 | 3 | 1 | 5 |
| teradata.com | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| unifygtm.com | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| reddit.com | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| oppora.ai | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 |
| salesintel.io | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
What this report publishesThe public buying questions, the brands each answer names, the sources it cites and a fingerprint of each answer. Answer text is not published, and no customer data is in it.sales-intelligence-platforms-2026-07-27 / 4-sales-intelligence-platforms-2026-07-27-models-64232fd32583
Why this rank
Recommend a sales intelligence platform for account intent, website activity, buying-stage signals, prioritization, and CRM activation. on Sales Intelligence Engine Disagreement by Prompt
Derives prompt-level brand leaders, cross-engine brand-set disagreement, and leading-brand owned-citation opportunity from the complete public Rank.ai benchmark cohort.
8
Rank on this board
77.778 percent
Score
3
Answers behind the score
100% confidence · 1 of 1 components evidenced
What the score is built from
1 of 1 evidencedEvery component evidenced · 1 evidence record each
| Component | Value | Contribution |
|---|---|---|
| Engine disagreement | 77.777778 | 77.778 |
Moved down since the previous snapshot
-5 places- Engine disagreement88.889 to 77.778-11.111
- Presence events8 to 5-3
- Citation URLS15 to 12-3
- Distinct reviewed brands6 to 3-3
- Leading brand consensus66.667 to 66.6670
- Leading brand owned citation coverage33.333 to 33.3330
- Leading brand owned citation gap33.333 to 33.3330
Where each number comes from
7 public recordsReviewed-brand presence eventsPresence events · observed Sep 26, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC5 presence_events100% confidence
- Source
- Rank.ai Sales Intelligence Prompt Benchmark
- Grade
- A
- Freshness
- fresh
- Locator
{"promptSlug":"sales-intelligence-buyer-intent","corpusVersion":"sales-intelligence-platforms-2026-07-27","runArtifactIds":["c9ff49e2-0fc3-47af-87d1-259914a274fd","a3191ab3-3fee-48bd-b347-58ffc54af652","e56bca98-6ceb-4d2b-90d6-06d1129eae83"],"parentSnapshotId":"fd60f639-e154-49dc-ba04-4c53ab59f80c","providerMatrixVersion":"64232fd32583"}
Distinct citation URLsCitation URLS · observed Sep 26, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC12 urls100% confidence
- Source
- Rank.ai Sales Intelligence Prompt Benchmark
- Grade
- A
- Freshness
- fresh
- Locator
{"promptSlug":"sales-intelligence-buyer-intent","corpusVersion":"sales-intelligence-platforms-2026-07-27","runArtifactIds":["c9ff49e2-0fc3-47af-87d1-259914a274fd","a3191ab3-3fee-48bd-b347-58ffc54af652","e56bca98-6ceb-4d2b-90d6-06d1129eae83"],"parentSnapshotId":"fd60f639-e154-49dc-ba04-4c53ab59f80c","providerMatrixVersion":"64232fd32583"}
Distinct reviewed brands surfacedDistinct reviewed brands · observed Sep 26, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC3 brands100% confidence
- Source
- Rank.ai Sales Intelligence Prompt Benchmark
- Grade
- A
- Freshness
- fresh
- Locator
{"promptSlug":"sales-intelligence-buyer-intent","corpusVersion":"sales-intelligence-platforms-2026-07-27","runArtifactIds":["c9ff49e2-0fc3-47af-87d1-259914a274fd","a3191ab3-3fee-48bd-b347-58ffc54af652","e56bca98-6ceb-4d2b-90d6-06d1129eae83"],"parentSnapshotId":"fd60f639-e154-49dc-ba04-4c53ab59f80c","providerMatrixVersion":"64232fd32583"}
Cross-engine brand disagreementEngine disagreement · observed Sep 26, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC77.778 percent100% confidence
- Source
- Rank.ai Sales Intelligence Prompt Benchmark
- Grade
- A
- Freshness
- fresh
- Locator
{"promptSlug":"sales-intelligence-buyer-intent","corpusVersion":"sales-intelligence-platforms-2026-07-27","runArtifactIds":["c9ff49e2-0fc3-47af-87d1-259914a274fd","a3191ab3-3fee-48bd-b347-58ffc54af652","e56bca98-6ceb-4d2b-90d6-06d1129eae83"],"parentSnapshotId":"fd60f639-e154-49dc-ba04-4c53ab59f80c","providerMatrixVersion":"64232fd32583"}
Leading-brand engine consensusLeading brand consensus · observed Sep 26, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC66.667 percent100% confidence
- Source
- Rank.ai Sales Intelligence Prompt Benchmark
- Grade
- A
- Freshness
- fresh
- Locator
{"promptSlug":"sales-intelligence-buyer-intent","corpusVersion":"sales-intelligence-platforms-2026-07-27","runArtifactIds":["c9ff49e2-0fc3-47af-87d1-259914a274fd","a3191ab3-3fee-48bd-b347-58ffc54af652","e56bca98-6ceb-4d2b-90d6-06d1129eae83"],"parentSnapshotId":"fd60f639-e154-49dc-ba04-4c53ab59f80c","providerMatrixVersion":"64232fd32583"}
Leading-brand owned-citation coverageLeading brand owned citation coverage · observed Sep 26, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC33.333 percent100% confidence
- Source
- Rank.ai Sales Intelligence Prompt Benchmark
- Grade
- A
- Freshness
- fresh
- Locator
{"promptSlug":"sales-intelligence-buyer-intent","corpusVersion":"sales-intelligence-platforms-2026-07-27","runArtifactIds":["c9ff49e2-0fc3-47af-87d1-259914a274fd","a3191ab3-3fee-48bd-b347-58ffc54af652","e56bca98-6ceb-4d2b-90d6-06d1129eae83"],"parentSnapshotId":"fd60f639-e154-49dc-ba04-4c53ab59f80c","providerMatrixVersion":"64232fd32583"}
Leading-brand owned-citation opportunityLeading brand owned citation gap · observed Sep 26, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC33.333 percentage_points100% confidence
- Source
- Rank.ai Sales Intelligence Prompt Benchmark
- Grade
- A
- Freshness
- fresh
- Locator
{"promptSlug":"sales-intelligence-buyer-intent","corpusVersion":"sales-intelligence-platforms-2026-07-27","runArtifactIds":["c9ff49e2-0fc3-47af-87d1-259914a274fd","a3191ab3-3fee-48bd-b347-58ffc54af652","e56bca98-6ceb-4d2b-90d6-06d1129eae83"],"parentSnapshotId":"fd60f639-e154-49dc-ba04-4c53ab59f80c","providerMatrixVersion":"64232fd32583"}
More in Sales intelligence
Contact-data, account-intelligence, intent, and enrichment platforms ranked across a fixed revenue buying corpus.
Reviewed vendors ranked by the share of all the category's answers that name or cite them.
Reviewed vendors ranked by their share of the citations that point to vendor websites.
See how often AI names you.
Enter your website. In about two minutes, Rank.ai asks ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini 12 questions your customers ask and grades how often they name you.
- Your grade out of 100How often AI names you, cites your site, and how high it ranks you.
- Who gets namedEvery competitor in the answers, most named first.
- The pages AI readsThe sources behind each answer.
- Three fixesWhat to fix first, with a brief for the first article.