Buyer prompt · published evidence

How should a buyer compare sales intelligence pricing across seats, credits, exports, enrichments, intent signals, APIs, and premium data?

An exact prompt-level view of which reviewed brands surfaced and which public URLs the configured AI models cited. No answer text or tenant data is published.

Intent
commercial
Model providers
3
Categories
1
Last observed
Aug 18, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC
Competitive outcome

Brands surfaced

Ordered by provider breadth, then total mentions and owned-domain citations. A mention is not an endorsement or a position claim.

#BrandCategoryProvidersMentionsOwned citationsProvider evidence
01Demandbasedemandbase.comSales data101Openai
Model comparison

Answer matrix

One row per configured provider and category snapshot. Hashes prove answer identity without publishing stored answer text.

ProviderModel versionCategoryBrands surfacedCitationsUnique domainsAnswer hash
Openaiopenai/gpt-4o-miniSales dataDemandbase88444f65de…7ef86
Anthropicanthropic/claude-haiku-4-5Sales dataNone observed0028004e2d…96abd
Geminigoogle/gemini-2.5-flashSales dataNone observed33eb85c015…1d729
URL-derived citations

Sources cited

Hostnames are derived from the returned public URLs. Best position is the smallest citation position observed.

Snapshot IDs2ce87b27-850a-47a0-96a1-dded6e265347
Corpus versionssales-intelligence-platforms-2026-07-27
Benchmark versions4-sales-intelligence-platforms-2026-07-27-models-64232fd32583

Coverage: Sales data. Full answers stored: no · Full answers published: no · Tenant data included: no.