Compared
Rank.ai vs Profound
Profound tracks ChatGPT for $99 and three engines for $399, with the full product behind an Enterprise demo. Rank.ai runs every question on seven engines from $50, tracks Google and local rankings beside them, and publishes the articles that close the gaps. This guide walks both products screen by screen, with prices from their live pricing page and ours.
In this guide
01
The short answer
Profound is the enterprise name in answer engine optimization, with customer stories from MongoDB, WHOOP and Ramp, an Agent Analytics surface that covers unlimited domains on every tier, and a free weekly industry leaderboard. The product is priced to match that market: the $99 plan tracks one engine, the $399 plan tracks three, exports are locked out of the bottom tier, and Claude, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek, the API and SSO all wait behind an Enterprise demo. Rank.ai sells the whole platform at the listed price: seven engines on every question from $50 a month, daily Google rank checks and a full local SEO suite on the same login, and long-form articles researched, written and published into your CMS, 10 a month included free.
Choose Rank.ai when
- You want all seven engines at a price you can expense today
- Google positions and map rankings belong beside the AI data
- Your content calendar wants a flat article allowance, and a $0 plan to prove it
- You want exports and public evidence from the bottom tier
Choose Profound when
- An Enterprise AEO contract with SSO and API access is the plan
- Microsoft Copilot and Google AI Mode coverage are requirements
- Agent Analytics across unlimited domains is the core need
- Their Prompt Volumes dataset matters to your research
02
What each platform does
Profound is an answer engine optimization platform: it tracks brand visibility in AI answers, attributes AI bot traffic through CDN integrations, and runs marketing Agents that generate and publish AEO content into CMSs like Webflow, WordPress, Contentful and Sanity. Its free public surface is the Profound Index, a weekly leaderboard across 50+ industries.

Rank.ai covers the same AI visibility measurement and puts it beside the rest of search: daily recorded answers across seven engines, daily Google rank checks, a geo-grid local tracker, and an article pipeline with a flat monthly allowance. The measurement itself runs in public on the daily boards, where every row carries its sample size, evidence ledger and CSV export.

03
Engine access at the prices you can buy
Profound’s published plans gate the engine list hard: $99 buys ChatGPT tracking alone, $399 buys three engines, and Claude, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek, Copilot and AI Mode appear only in the Enterprise column of their own pricing matrix. The exports row on the $99 plan reads None.

On Rank.ai every question runs against ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Grok, Google AI Overviews and DeepSeek daily, three samples per engine, from the $50 plan up. Engines are never gated per plan or charged per model. The buyers asking Claude and Gemini about your market are answered by different pages than the ones ChatGPT reads, and you find that out on day one, on a card you can expense. At the top end Profound reaches nine engines by adding Microsoft Copilot and Google AI Mode, which we do not track today.
04
Every recorded answer is a work order
Each Rank.ai run stores the full answer text, the exact model version that produced it, whether your brand was named and how far into the answer it first appears, whether your site was cited and at what position in the source list, the complete ordered list of cited pages, and the searches the engine ran where it exposes them. The morning after a run, you open the answer that left you out, read the two or three pages it was built from, and commission the article for that gap from the same dashboard. The distance from insight to published fix is one approval click, and the next day’s run tells you whether it worked.

05
Google and local rankings on the same login
Profound reads your Google Search Console; Rank.ai tracks positions. Every plan checks your Google rankings daily, 3 keywords at $0 up to 100 on Pro, and the local suite scans a geo-grid of points around each location to map your Google Maps rank street by street, with Local Pack tracking, GBP audits and review monitoring beside it. Profound has no rank tracker and no local surface, which fits its enterprise SaaS customer list. If customers ever find you through a map, this platform tracks that too, on the bill you already pay.
06
Long-form articles with a predictable bill
Both platforms generate content and publish into CMSs, so the choice is about output and metering. Profound’s Agents produce AEO content and consume credits per run, 100 a month on Starter and 400 on Growth. Rank.ai’s pipeline is built for long-form: it researches each topic against live search results and the pages already ranking, writes the draft, generates the images, holds it for your approval, and publishes into WordPress, Webflow or Shopify. The allowance is flat: 10 articles a month at $0, 30 at $50, 100 at $250. Your content calendar gets a number it can plan around, and the free tier alone publishes a page every three days.
The pipeline runs on your rules. You set the pace in articles per week, the themes to cover and the direction for titles and style, and you can paste in samples of your own writing for it to match your voice. A competitor blacklist guarantees no generated article ever links to a rival domain, subdomains included. Auto publish is one switch: leave it off and every draft waits in the review queue with the question it answers, or turn it on and the pipeline writes and publishes at your set cadence while you watch the rank data move.
07
The full ledger
Every Profound cell below is grounded in their public pages, rendered in a browser; every Rank.ai cell is verified against our own code. Where we are behind, the cell says so.
| Capability | Rank.ai | Profound |
|---|---|---|
| Engines + tracking | ||
| Engines on the plans you can buy online | All 7 from $50/mo | 1 on $99, 3 on $399 |
| Engines at the top end | 7 | Up to 9 (Enterprise) |
| Claude + Gemini tracking | Yes | Enterprise only |
| Grok + DeepSeek tracking | Yes | Enterprise only |
| Google AI Overviews tracking | Yes | $399 plan and up |
| Microsoft Copilot tracking | No | Enterprise only |
| Citations per recorded answer | Yes | Yes |
| Sentiment per brand mention | Yes | Yes |
| Search surfaces | ||
| Daily Google rank tracker | Yes | No |
| Local SEO (GBP, Maps, geo-grid) | Yes | No |
| AI bot and referral analytics | Starter and up | Yes |
| Content | ||
| Content generation with CMS publishing | Yes | Yes |
| Articles included at a flat monthly price | 10 to 100 a month | Credit-metered Agents |
| Data access | ||
| Public visibility data | Daily recorded answers with sources | Weekly industry leaderboard |
| Free tools without signup | Yes | Report by request |
| MCP server | Pro plan | Yes |
| Public API | In roadmap | Enterprise only |
| Data exports | CSV, every plan | None on $99, CSV/JSON on $399+ |
| Entry price | $0, no card | $99/mo, ChatGPT only |
Sources: tryprofound.com/pricing, /integrations, /customers, /profound-index, docs.tryprofound.com. Rendered in a browser August 2026.
08
Frequently asked
What's the core difference between Rank.ai and Profound?
How much does Profound cost, and what does each plan include?
Do you track as many engines as Profound?
Doesn't Profound also generate content and publish to a CMS?
Does Profound do Google rank tracking or local SEO?
Do you have an API and analytics like Profound's?
Profound has big-name customers. Why switch?
Can I use both?
The free plan publishes 10 articles a month
Connect your site, see your rankings across seven AI engines and Google, and judge the output on your own domain before you spend anything.
