Ranks Legal AI prompts by how differently the configured engines surface the reviewed brand universe.
Compare one brand with up to three competitors across the exact public prompt × engine matrix behind this leaderboard.
| Brand | Presence | Vs. primary | Selected share | Mentions | Cited answers | Owned URL signals | Engine breadth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harveyharvey.ai | 47.9%23/48 | BASE | 42.6% | 78 | 9 | 9 | 3/3 |
| CoCounselthomsonreuters.com | 33.3%16/48 | -14.6 pp | 29.6% | 51 | 7 | 7 | 3/3 |
| Lexis+ AIlexisnexis.com | 27.1%13/48 | -20.8 pp | 24.1% | 22 | 4 | 4 | 3/3 |
| vLex Vincent AIvlex.com | 4.2%2/48 | -43.8 pp | 3.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2/3 |
16 prompts · 48 immutable answer hashes · empty cells mean no compared brand was detected.
| Public prompt | OpenAIopenai/gpt-4o-mini | Anthropicanthropic/claude-haiku-4-5 | Geminigoogle/gemini-2.5-flash |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01 Which legal AI platforms are best for research, drafting, review, analysis, citations, workflow, security, and professional accountability?recommendation | CoCounsel · C1 | HarveyCoCounsel · C1Lexis+ AI · C1 | CoCounsel · C1 |
| 02 Recommend a legal AI platform for cited case, statute, regulation, secondary-source, and jurisdiction-specific research with verification.recommendation | CoCounsel | Lexis+ AI | No selected brand |
| 03 Which legal AI platforms are strongest for contract review, extraction, playbooks, redlines, risk, comparison, and approval workflows?recommendation | Harvey | Harvey | No selected brand |
| 04 Recommend a legal AI platform for drafting and revising agreements, briefs, memos, correspondence, clauses, and transaction documents.recommendation | HarveyLexis+ AI · C1 | CoCounsel | Harvey |
| 05 Which legal AI platforms are best for litigation teams handling discovery, chronologies, evidence, depositions, motions, authorities, and case strategy?recommendation | Lexis+ AI | No selected brand | No selected brand |
| 06 Recommend a legal AI platform for an in-house team managing contracts, requests, policies, knowledge, outside counsel, and business self-service.recommendation | Harvey | No selected brand | Harvey · C1Lexis+ AI · C1 |
| 07 Which legal AI platforms are strongest for a law firm that needs matter controls, knowledge integration, auditability, adoption, and support?recommendation | CoCounsel · C1Lexis+ AI | HarveyCoCounselLexis+ AI | Harvey · C1 |
| 08 Recommend an affordable legal AI platform for a small practice that needs reliable research, drafting, document review, and clear limits.recommendation | HarveyCoCounsel | No selected brand | CoCounsel |
| 09 Compare legal AI platforms on accuracy, citations, jurisdictions, workflows, integrations, confidentiality, governance, support, and price.commercial | HarveyCoCounsel | HarveyCoCounsel · C1Lexis+ AI | HarveyCoCounsel · C1Lexis+ AI |
| 10 Create a reproducible legal AI evaluation covering authority validity, citation support, jurisdiction, dates, holdings, exceptions, and hallucinations.commercial | No selected brand | No selected brand | No selected brand |
| 11 Design a contract-review benchmark for legal AI using known clauses, missing terms, conflicts, defined terms, playbooks, redlines, and explanations.commercial | No selected brand | No selected brand | Harvey · C1 |
| 12 Compare legal AI platforms on privilege, confidentiality, model training, retention, encryption, permissions, residency, audit logs, and deletion.commercial | vLex Vincent AI · C1 | HarveyCoCounselLexis+ AI | vLex Vincent AI · C1 |
| 13 Compare legal AI platforms on document, matter, contract, research, billing, email, identity, knowledge, API, and workflow integrations.commercial | Harvey | Harvey · C1CoCounselLexis+ AI | Harvey · C1 |
| 14 How should a buyer compare legal AI pricing across users, matters, documents, research content, modules, implementation, and support?commercial | No selected brand | CoCounsel · C1Lexis+ AI · C1 | No selected brand |
| 15 Which criteria expose research, document, playbook, clause, knowledge, matter, workflow, export, and API lock-in in a legal AI platform?commercial | No selected brand | Harvey · C1 | Harvey · C1 |
| 16 Create a shortlist of legal AI vendors for a regulated organization standardizing governed legal research and document workflows.commercial | Harvey · C1 | Harvey | Harvey · C1CoCounselLexis+ AI |
Hostnames are derived from validated public HTTP(S) URLs, not provider-supplied domain labels.
| Source hostname | Cited answers | Distinct URLs | Engine breadth | Best position | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| clio.com | 15 | 13 | 3 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| reddit.com | 14 | 12 | 3 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| mycase.com | 14 | 2 | 3 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| darrow.ai | 12 | 1 | 3 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| spellbook.com | 10 | 9 | 3 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| legalfly.com | 10 | 6 | 3 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| harvey.ai | 9 | 6 | 3 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| gc.ai | 8 | 11 | 3 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| linkedin.com | 8 | 8 | 3 | #2 | Open source ↗ |
| ironcladapp.com | 8 | 4 | 3 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| legal.thomsonreuters.com | 7 | 4 | 3 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| legalontech.com | 7 | 4 | 2 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| leanlaw.co | 7 | 2 | 3 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| eve.legal | 6 | 2 | 3 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| youtube.com | 5 | 5 | 2 | #3 | Open source ↗ |
| legaltechnologyhub.com | 4 | 4 | 3 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| lexisnexis.com | 4 | 4 | 3 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| americanbar.org | 4 | 3 | 2 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| jdsupra.com | 4 | 3 | 2 | #3 | Open source ↗ |
| nexlaw.ai | 4 | 3 | 1 | #3 | Open source ↗ |