Buyer prompt · published evidence

Recommend a legal AI platform for an in-house team managing contracts, requests, policies, knowledge, outside counsel, and business self-service.

An exact prompt-level view of which reviewed brands surfaced and which public URLs the configured AI models cited. No answer text or tenant data is published.

Intent
recommendation
Model providers
3
Categories
1
Last observed
Aug 30, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC
Competitive outcome

Brands surfaced

Ordered by provider breadth, then total mentions and owned-domain citations. A mention is not an endorsement or a position claim.

#BrandCategoryProvidersMentionsOwned citationsProvider evidence
01Harveyharvey.aiLegal AI232Openai · Gemini
02Luminanceluminance.comLegal AI120Openai
03Spellbookspellbook.legalLegal AI120Openai
Model comparison

Answer matrix

One row per configured provider and category snapshot. Hashes prove answer identity without publishing stored answer text.

ProviderModel versionCategoryBrands surfacedCitationsUnique domainsAnswer hash
Openaiopenai/gpt-4o-miniLegal AIHarvey · Spellbook · Luminance66b1868516…2000b
Anthropicanthropic/claude-haiku-4-5Legal AINone observed00559f5fe3…1c08f
Geminigoogle/gemini-2.5-flashLegal AIHarvey8815cf36b6…e981d
URL-derived citations

Sources cited

Hostnames are derived from the returned public URLs. Best position is the smallest citation position observed.

Snapshot IDs15434873-391f-4505-b99c-df10e62d922c
Corpus versionslegal-ai-platforms-2026-07-27
Benchmark versions4-legal-ai-platforms-2026-07-27-models-64232fd32583

Coverage: Legal AI. Full answers stored: no · Full answers published: no · Tenant data included: no.