Buyer prompt · published evidence
Which legal AI platforms are strongest for contract review, extraction, playbooks, redlines, risk, comparison, and approval workflows?
An exact prompt-level view of which reviewed brands surfaced and which public URLs the configured AI models cited. No answer text or tenant data is published.
- Intent
- recommendation
- Model providers
- 3
- Categories
- 1
- Last observed
- Aug 30, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC
Competitive outcome
Brands surfaced
Ordered by provider breadth, then total mentions and owned-domain citations. A mention is not an endorsement or a position claim.
| # | Brand | Category | Providers | Mentions | Owned citations | Provider evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | CoCounselthomsonreuters.com ↗ | Legal AI | 2 | 0 | 2 | Openai · Gemini |
| 02 | Harveyharvey.ai ↗ | Legal AI | 1 | 2 | 0 | Openai |
| 03 | Spellbookspellbook.legal ↗ | Legal AI | 1 | 2 | 0 | Openai |
| 04 | Evisortevisort.com ↗ | Legal AI | 1 | 1 | 0 | Gemini |
| 05 | Luminanceluminance.com ↗ | Legal AI | 1 | 1 | 0 | Gemini |
| 06 | Ironclad AIironcladapp.com ↗ | Legal AI | 1 | 0 | 1 | Gemini |
Model comparison
Answer matrix
One row per configured provider and category snapshot. Hashes prove answer identity without publishing stored answer text.
| Provider | Model version | Category | Brands surfaced | Citations | Unique domains | Answer hash |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Openai | openai/gpt-4o-mini | Legal AI | Harvey · CoCounsel · Spellbook | 6 | 6 | f1601518…ff163 |
| Anthropic | anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5 | Legal AI | None observed | 0 | 0 | a31f3095…436a6 |
| Gemini | google/gemini-2.5-flash | Legal AI | CoCounsel · Luminance · Evisort · Ironclad AI | 7 | 7 | 66306d58…24b74 |
URL-derived citations
Sources cited
Hostnames are derived from the returned public URLs. Best position is the smallest citation position observed.