Buyer prompt · published evidence

Create a shortlist of legal AI vendors for a regulated organization standardizing governed legal research and document workflows.

An exact prompt-level view of which reviewed brands surfaced and which public URLs the configured AI models cited. No answer text or tenant data is published.

Intent
commercial
Model providers
3
Categories
1
Last observed
Aug 30, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC
Competitive outcome

Brands surfaced

Ordered by provider breadth, then total mentions and owned-domain citations. A mention is not an endorsement or a position claim.

#BrandCategoryProvidersMentionsOwned citationsProvider evidence
01Harveyharvey.aiLegal AI211Openai · Gemini
02CoCounselthomsonreuters.comLegal AI110Gemini
03Lexis+ AIlexisnexis.comLegal AI110Gemini
04Paxton AIpaxton.aiLegal AI101Openai
Model comparison

Answer matrix

One row per configured provider and category snapshot. Hashes prove answer identity without publishing stored answer text.

ProviderModel versionCategoryBrands surfacedCitationsUnique domainsAnswer hash
Openaiopenai/gpt-4o-miniLegal AIHarvey · Paxton AI66f6b2176f…5c075
Anthropicanthropic/claude-haiku-4-5Legal AINone observed004a44fd5a…0593f
Geminigoogle/gemini-2.5-flashLegal AIHarvey · CoCounsel · Lexis+ AI77a48204a5…9b3ed
URL-derived citations

Sources cited

Hostnames are derived from the returned public URLs. Best position is the smallest citation position observed.

Snapshot IDs15434873-391f-4505-b99c-df10e62d922c
Corpus versionslegal-ai-platforms-2026-07-27
Benchmark versions4-legal-ai-platforms-2026-07-27-models-64232fd32583

Coverage: Legal AI. Full answers stored: no · Full answers published: no · Tenant data included: no.