Skip to content
Get my AI grade

Datacenters

Operational AI data centers

74 infrastructures ranked by facility power.
Recorded Oct 20, 2026Checked dailySource: Epoch AIHow this board is measuredCSV / JSON

1,037 MW

Anthropic-Amazon New Carlisle ranks first

Facility power

74

Infrastructures ranked

Oct 20

Snapshot recorded

2026 · Checked daily

Follow changes

All 74 infrastructures by facility power

Anthropic-Amazon New Carlisle leads at 1,037 MW; the middle of the board sits at 152.5.

Ahead of second place
91
Held by the top three
18%
Middle of the board
152.5
Below half the leader
71 of 74
Highest 1,037 MWMiddle 152.5
1. Anthropic-Amazon New Carlisle: 1,037 MW2. Colossus 2: 946 MW3. Microsoft Fairwater Atlanta: 636 MW4. DayOne Nusajaya: 473 MW5. Meta Prometheus: 471 MW6. DayOne Kempas: 421.692 MW7. OpenAI Stargate Abilene: 421 MW8. Microsoft Fairwater Wisconsin: 369 MW9. Google Pryor (North): 368 MW10. Colossus 1: 340 MW11. Google New Albany: 333 MW12. Google Columbus: 303 MW13. Amazon Madison Mega Site: 284 MW14. CoreWeave Denton TX: 262 MW15. Bridge Data Centres MY06: 243 MW16. Google Bristow: 238 MW17. QTS Richmond 1: 238 MW18. Google Council Bluffs (East): 237 MW19. Google Omaha: 237 MW20. Google Papillion: 237 MW21. Amazon Ridgeland: 228 MW22. VNET Bayin Ulanqab: 221 MW23. AWS New Albany: 213 MW24. Microsoft Goodyear: 202 MW25. Microsoft Project Osmium: 190 MW26. Huawei Horinger: 184.3 MW27. Google Mesa: 183 MW28. Meta-QTS Hillsboro 2: 180 MW29. QTS Richmond 2: 180 MW30. Meta Jeffersonville: 178 MW31. Meta Rosemount: 178 MW32. Meta Temple: 178 MW33. Alibaba Zhangbei: 169 MW34. Google Storey County: 161 MW35. Huawei Wuhu: 157 MW36. Google The Dalles: 154 MW37. Meta Montgomery: 153 MW38. Meta Cheyenne: 152 MW39. Meta Kuna: 152 MW40. Meta Huntsville: 146 MW41. QTS Richmond 3: 144 MW42. Google Lincoln: 141 MW43. Google Lancaster: 137 MW44. Meta Eagle Mountain: 133 MW45. Coreweave Helios: 132 MW46. AWS Berwick: 108 MW47. Google Kansas City East: 105 MW48. Google Midlothian: 103 MW49. Google Waltham Cross: 88 MW50. Meta Gallatin: 87 MW51. Meta Los Lunas: 87 MW52. STACK Infrastructure NVA02: 85 MW53. CoreWeave Chester VA: 82 MW54. Meta Sarpy: 80 MW55. Google Arcola: 77 MW56. Google Red Oak: 77 MW57. Microsoft SAT40: 75 MW58. Nebius Mantsala: 75 MW59. Oracle Batam: 72 MW60. Meta Aiken: 69 MW61. CoreWeave Ellendale ND: 68 MW62. CoreWeave Marble NC: 65 MW63. Stream Phoenix: 64 MW64. Core42 Lake Mariner: 58 MW65. Microsoft-Nebius New Jersey: 50 MW66. Microsoft SAT14: 47 MW67. Anthropic Lake Mariner: 42 MW68. CoreWeave Norway: 42 MW69. Southgate Melbourne: 41 MW70. Start Campus Sines Data Campus: 33 MW71. Vantage TX1: 32 MW72. CoreWeave Dalton 1 & 2: 28 MW73. xAI QTS Atlanta: 17.33 MW74. Nscale Keflavik: 5.11 MW
Rank 1One bar per published rowRank 74

Epoch AI release: 2026-10-20 · 3 checks behind each row · 70% confidence across rows.

Operational AI data centers current rankings
RankNameFacility powerData center capex 2025Data center H100 equivalentsWhy
01Anthropic-Amazon New Carlisle1,037 MW$39.28B818.4K H100eThis rank
02Colossus 2946 MW$35.84B1.1M H100eThis rank
03Microsoft Fairwater Atlanta636 MW$24.09B768.8K H100eThis rank
04DayOne Nusajaya473 MW$17.92B583.8K H100eThis rank
05Meta Prometheus471 MW$17.84B536.3K H100eThis rank
06DayOne Kempas421.692 MW$15.97B480.6K H100eThis rank
07OpenAI Stargate Abilene421 MW$15.95B509.3K H100eThis rank
08Microsoft Fairwater Wisconsin369 MW$13.98B445.7K H100eThis rank
09Google Pryor (North)368 MW$13.94B636.7K H100eThis rank
10Colossus 1340 MW$12.88B275.8K H100eThis rank
11Google New Albany333 MW$12.61B323.9K H100eThis rank
12Google Columbus303 MW$11.48B332K H100eThis rank
13Amazon Madison Mega Site284 MW$10.76B214.3K H100eThis rank
14CoreWeave Denton TX262 MW$9.93B252.7K H100eThis rank
15Bridge Data Centres MY06243 MW$9.21B221.1K H100eThis rank
16Google Bristow238 MW$9.02B209.9K H100eThis rank
17QTS Richmond 1238 MW$9.02B242.5K H100eThis rank
18Google Council Bluffs (East)237 MW$8.98B255.7K H100eThis rank
19Google Omaha237 MW$8.98B198.6K H100eThis rank
20Google Papillion237 MW$8.98B100.6K H100eThis rank
21Amazon Ridgeland228 MW$8.64B171.3K H100eThis rank
22VNET Bayin Ulanqab221 MW$8.37B122.8K H100eThis rank
23AWS New Albany213 MW$8.07B201.1K H100eThis rank
24Microsoft Goodyear202 MW$7.65B205.2K H100eThis rank
25Microsoft Project Osmium190 MW$7.2B155.6K H100eThis rank
26Huawei Horinger184.3 MW$6.98B89.4K H100eThis rank
27Google Mesa183 MW$6.93B289.5K H100eThis rank
28Meta-QTS Hillsboro 2180 MW$6.82B123.8K H100eThis rank
29QTS Richmond 2180 MW$6.82B182.9K H100eThis rank
30Meta Jeffersonville178 MW$6.74B203.1K H100eThis rank
31Meta Rosemount178 MW$6.74B215.7K H100eThis rank
32Meta Temple178 MW$6.74B202.5K H100eThis rank
33Alibaba Zhangbei169 MW$6.4B31.9K H100eThis rank
34Google Storey County161 MW$6.1B133.9K H100eThis rank
35Huawei Wuhu157 MW$5.95B76.3K H100eThis rank
36Google The Dalles154 MW$5.83B175.3K H100eThis rank
37Meta Montgomery153 MW$5.8B174.5K H100eThis rank
38Meta Cheyenne152 MW$5.76B172.8K H100eThis rank
39Meta Kuna152 MW$5.76B173.2K H100eThis rank
40Meta Huntsville146 MW$5.53B166.8K H100eThis rank
41QTS Richmond 3144 MW$5.46B174.8K H100eThis rank
42Google Lincoln141 MW$5.34B197.6K H100eThis rank
43Google Lancaster137 MW$5.19B130.4K H100eThis rank
44Meta Eagle Mountain133 MW$5.04B151.4K H100eThis rank
45Coreweave Helios132 MW$5B159.6K H100eThis rank
46AWS Berwick108 MW$4.09B81.4K H100eThis rank
47Google Kansas City East105 MW$3.98B202.6K H100eThis rank
48Google Midlothian103 MW$3.9B143.6K H100eThis rank
49Google Waltham Cross88 MW$3.33B123.8K H100eThis rank
50Meta Gallatin87 MW$3.3B99.5K H100eThis rank
51Meta Los Lunas87 MW$3.3B99.5K H100eThis rank
52STACK Infrastructure NVA0285 MW$3.22B61.1K H100eThis rank
53CoreWeave Chester VA82 MW$3.11B88.4K H100eThis rank
54Meta Sarpy80 MW$3.03B92K H100eThis rank
55Google Arcola77 MW$2.92B108.1K H100eThis rank
56Google Red Oak77 MW$2.92B108.1K H100eThis rank
57Microsoft SAT4075 MW$2.84B64.7K H100eThis rank
58Nebius Mantsala75 MW$2.84B48.5K H100eThis rank
59Oracle Batam72 MW$2.73B84.4K H100eShowing
60Meta Aiken69 MW$2.61B78.3K H100eThis rank
61CoreWeave Ellendale ND68 MW$2.58B93.5K H100eThis rank
62CoreWeave Marble NC65 MW$2.46B78.8K H100eThis rank
63Stream Phoenix64 MW$2.42B46.1K H100eThis rank
64Core42 Lake Mariner58 MW$2.2B71.8K H100eThis rank
65Microsoft-Nebius New Jersey50 MW$1.89B56.8K H100eThis rank
66Microsoft SAT1447 MW$1.78B45.2K H100eThis rank
67Anthropic Lake Mariner42 MW$1.59B58.6K H100eThis rank
68CoreWeave Norway42 MW$1.59B50.8K H100eThis rank
69Southgate Melbourne41 MW$1.55B46.5K H100eThis rank
70Start Campus Sines Data Campus33 MW$1.25B31.8K H100eThis rank
71Vantage TX132 MW$1.21B38.7K H100eThis rank
72CoreWeave Dalton 1 & 228 MW$1.06B32.2K H100eThis rank
73xAI QTS Atlanta17.33 MW$656.48M11.5K H100eThis rank
74Nscale Keflavik5.11 MW$193.58M5,821.1 H100eThis rank

Why this rank

Oracle Batam on Operational AI Data Centers

Snapshot of Oct 20, 2026, 12:00 PM UTC · Link to this snapshot

Some explanation inputs are unavailable. Not published: the evidence frozen with this snapshot, comparable prior ranking.

Epoch current data-center records with positive current power, capital cost, and H100-equivalent values.

59

Rank on this board

72 MW

Score

3

Inputs behind the score

70% confidence · 1 of 1 components evidenced

What the score is built from

1 of 1 evidenced

Every component evidenced · 1 evidence record each

Components of Oracle Batam's score
ComponentValueContribution
Data center facility power MW72.000000000072

Unchanged since the previous snapshot

No change in rank

component_history_unavailable

No component moved since the previous snapshot.

Where each number comes from

3 public records
  • Facility capital costData center capex 2025 · observed Oct 20, 2026, 12:00 PM UTC$2.73B70% confidence
    Source
    Epoch AI open datasets
    Grade
    A
    Freshness
    fresh
    Locator
    {"rowCount":95,"downloadUrl":"https://epoch.ai/data/data_centers/data_centers.csv","releaseDate":"2026-10-20","contentHashKind":"sha256_raw_bytes","expectedColumns":["Name","Current H100 equivalents","Current power (MW)","Current total capital cost (2025 USD billions)","Owner","Users","Selected Sources","Calculations sheet","Project","Current chip types","All chip types","Investors","Construction companies","Energy companies","Country","Address"],"documentationUrl":"https://epoch.ai/data/data-centers-documentation/downloads","documentationHash":"40bcdc602d20546fb253629beb3f25ee4df294388d5614986572e3d7ef4e1396"}
    Open the source
  • Facility powerData center facility power MW · observed Oct 20, 2026, 12:00 PM UTC72 MW70% confidence
    Source
    Epoch AI open datasets
    Grade
    A
    Freshness
    fresh
    Locator
    {"rowCount":95,"downloadUrl":"https://epoch.ai/data/data_centers/data_centers.csv","releaseDate":"2026-10-20","contentHashKind":"sha256_raw_bytes","expectedColumns":["Name","Current H100 equivalents","Current power (MW)","Current total capital cost (2025 USD billions)","Owner","Users","Selected Sources","Calculations sheet","Project","Current chip types","All chip types","Investors","Construction companies","Energy companies","Country","Address"],"documentationUrl":"https://epoch.ai/data/data-centers-documentation/downloads","documentationHash":"40bcdc602d20546fb253629beb3f25ee4df294388d5614986572e3d7ef4e1396"}
    Open the source
  • H100-equivalent computeData center H100 equivalents · observed Oct 20, 2026, 12:00 PM UTC84,386.054 H100e70% confidence
    Source
    Epoch AI open datasets
    Grade
    A
    Freshness
    fresh
    Locator
    {"rowCount":95,"downloadUrl":"https://epoch.ai/data/data_centers/data_centers.csv","releaseDate":"2026-10-20","contentHashKind":"sha256_raw_bytes","expectedColumns":["Name","Current H100 equivalents","Current power (MW)","Current total capital cost (2025 USD billions)","Owner","Users","Selected Sources","Calculations sheet","Project","Current chip types","All chip types","Investors","Construction companies","Energy companies","Country","Address"],"documentationUrl":"https://epoch.ai/data/data-centers-documentation/downloads","documentationHash":"40bcdc602d20546fb253629beb3f25ee4df294388d5614986572e3d7ef4e1396"}
    Open the source
Epoch AI: ai-data-centers-operational, version 1.1.0222 observations · 1 source · quality passed
Snapshot
c4afb7e8-704b-4949-b1a6-8d39674b6729
Data hash
f86b4d1885e4869be725414f9c90af38be73fb29f095925179d5a72f495cb51f
Method hash
0edf4de2d27d7726faaf70dd5afcea32f2589d1aa1f6cfa75caaaa74be24d38d

More in Datacenters

Operating, under-construction, and planned AI capacity by place and operator.

3 boards
State AI infrastructure pipeline

A reviewed first-party project cohort with announced, under-construction, and energized stages plus separately scoped disclosed datacenter and compute MW. Permits and grid queues are never inferred.

See how often AI names you.

Enter your website. In about two minutes, Rank.ai asks ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini 12 questions your customers ask and grades how often they name you.

  • Your grade out of 100How often AI names you, cites your site, and how high it ranks you.
  • Who gets namedEvery competitor in the answers, most named first.
  • The pages AI readsThe sources behind each answer.
  • Three fixesWhat to fix first, with a brief for the first article.