Buyer prompt · published evidence

What AI model API platform should an early-stage startup evaluate first?

An exact prompt-level view of which reviewed brands surfaced and which public URLs the configured AI models cited. No answer text or tenant data is published.

Intent
recommendation
Model providers
3
Categories
1
Last observed
Sep 10, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC
Competitive outcome

Brands surfaced

Ordered by provider breadth, then total mentions and owned-domain citations. A mention is not an endorsement or a position claim.

#BrandCategoryProvidersMentionsOwned citationsProvider evidence
01OpenAIopenai.comBrands221Openai · Gemini
02Anthropicanthropic.comBrands130Openai
03Hugging Facehuggingface.coBrands120Openai
04Together AItogether.aiBrands111Gemini
05Google Geminiai.google.devBrands110Gemini
Model comparison

Answer matrix

One row per configured provider and category snapshot. Hashes prove answer identity without publishing stored answer text.

ProviderModel versionCategoryBrands surfacedCitationsUnique domainsAnswer hash
Openaiopenai/gpt-4o-miniBrandsOpenAI · Anthropic · Hugging Face55d3f445b6…1d20a
Anthropicanthropic/claude-haiku-4-5BrandsNone observed0009ba05d0…ec7a6
Geminigoogle/gemini-2.5-flashBrandsOpenAI · Google Gemini · Together AI88b1de94ed…56fad
URL-derived citations

Sources cited

Hostnames are derived from the returned public URLs. Best position is the smallest citation position observed.

Snapshot IDs5822220c-0bc2-456a-a7a8-9bcfe3108738
Corpus versionsai-model-api-platforms-2026-07-26
Benchmark versions4-ai-model-api-platforms-2026-07-26-models-64232fd32583

Coverage: Brands. Full answers stored: no · Full answers published: no · Tenant data included: no.