Loading ranking table…
Loading the latest published snapshot and its supporting evidence.
LIVE RANKINGS & DATA
Loading the latest published snapshot and its supporting evidence.
Ranks reviewed AI Writing & Content brands by presence in Anthropic's configured model API answers to the fixed public prompt cohort. This does not measure the consumer application.
| Rank | Entity | Signal | Anthropic recommendation-prompt presence | Mention coverage | Mention share | Citation share | Engine breadth | OpenAI rec. presence | OpenAI coverage | Confidence | N | Change | Trend | Explain |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Jaspercompany | 62.5% | 41.67% | 32.79% | 34.78% | 3 | 62.5% | 43.75% | 100% | 8 | — | — | Analyze brandWhy this rank | |
| 02 | Copy.aicompany | 37.5% | 27.08% | 21.31% | 0% | 3 | 37.5% | 31.25% | 100% | 8 | — | — | Analyze brandWhy this rank | |
| 03 | Typefacecompany | 12.5% | 12.5% | 9.84% | 8.7% | 3 | 12.5% | 6.25% | 100% | 8 | — | — | Analyze brandWhy this rank | |
| 04 | Writesoniccompany | 12.5% | 12.5% | 9.84% | 0% | 2 | 25% | 18.75% | 100% | 8 | — | — | Analyze brandWhy this rank | |
| 05 | Adobe GenStudiocompany | 12.5% | 6.25% | 4.92% | 17.39% | 2 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 8 | — | — | Analyze brandViewing why | |
| 06 | Rytrcompany | 12.5% | 4.17% | 3.28% | 4.35% | 2 | 12.5% | 6.25% | 100% | 8 | — | — | Analyze brandWhy this rank | |
| 07 | Writercompany | 12.5% | 4.17% | 3.28% | 4.35% | 2 | 12.5% | 6.25% | 100% | 8 | — | — | Analyze brandWhy this rank | |
| 08 | Grammarlycompany | 0.0% | 8.33% | 6.56% | 0% | 2 | 25% | 18.75% | 100% | 8 | — | — | Analyze brandWhy this rank | |
| 09 | HubSpot Content Hubcompany | 0.0% | 8.33% | 6.56% | 30.43% | 3 | 0% | 6.25% | 100% | 8 | — | — | Analyze brandWhy this rank | |
| 10 | Canva Magic Writecompany | 0.0% | 2.08% | 1.64% | 0% | 1 | 0% | 6.25% | 100% | 8 | — | — | Analyze brandWhy this rank | |
| 11 | Anywordcompany | 0.0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 8 | — | — | Analyze brandWhy this rank | |
| 12 | Notion AIcompany | 0.0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 8 | — | — | Analyze brandWhy this rank |
The explanation service did not return a publishable result.
| Rank | Entity | Signal | Anthropic recommendation-prompt presence | Mention coverage | Mention share | Citation share | Engine breadth | OpenAI rec. presence | OpenAI coverage | Confidence | N | Change | Trend | Explain | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Jaspercompany | 62.5% | 41.67% | 32.79% | 34.78% | 3 | 62.5% | 43.75% | 100% | 8 | — | — | Analyze brandWhy this rank | ||
| 02 | Copy.aicompany | 37.5% | 27.08% | 21.31% | 0% | 3 | 37.5% | 31.25% | 100% | 8 | — | — | Analyze brandWhy this rank | ||
| 03 | Typefacecompany | 12.5% | 12.5% | 9.84% | 8.7% | 3 | 12.5% | 6.25% | 100% | 8 | — | — | Analyze brandWhy this rank | ||
| 04 | Writesoniccompany | 12.5% | 12.5% | 9.84% | 0% | 2 | 25% | 18.75% | 100% | 8 | — | — | Analyze brandWhy this rank | ||
| 05 | Adobe GenStudiocompany | 12.5% | 6.25% | 4.92% | 17.39% | 2 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 8 | — | — | Analyze brandViewing why | ||
| 06 | Rytrcompany | 12.5% | 4.17% | 3.28% | 4.35% | 2 | 12.5% | 6.25% | 100% | 8 | — | — | Analyze brandWhy this rank | ||
| 07 | Writercompany | 12.5% | 4.17% | 3.28% | 4.35% | 2 | 12.5% | 6.25% | 100% | 8 | — | — | Analyze brandWhy this rank | ||
| 08 | Grammarlycompany | 0.0% | 8.33% | 6.56% | 0% | 2 | 25% | 18.75% | 100% | 8 | — | — | Analyze brandWhy this rank | ||
| 09 | HubSpot Content Hubcompany | 0.0% | 8.33% | 6.56% | 30.43% | 3 | 0% | 6.25% | 100% | 8 | — | — | Analyze brandWhy this rank | ||
| 10 | Canva Magic Writecompany | 0.0% | 2.08% | 1.64% | 0% | 1 | 0% | 6.25% | 100% | 8 | — | — | Analyze brandWhy this rank | ||
| 11 | Anywordcompany | 0.0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 8 | — | — | Analyze brandWhy this rank | ||
| 12 | Notion AIcompany | 0.0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 8 | — | — | Analyze brandWhy this rank |
Compare one brand with up to three competitors across the exact public prompt × engine matrix behind this leaderboard.
| Brand | Presence | Vs. primary | Selected share | Mentions | Cited answers | Owned URL signals | Engine breadth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasperjasper.ai | 41.7%20/48 | BASE | 51.3% | 48 | 3 | 8 | 3/3 |
| Copy.aicopy.ai | 27.1%13/48 | -14.6 pp | 33.3% | 28 | 0 | 0 | 3/3 |
| Grammarlygrammarly.com | 8.3%4/48 | -33.3 pp | 10.3% | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2/3 |
| Writerwriter.com | 4.2%2/48 | -37.5 pp | 5.1% | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2/3 |
16 prompts · 48 immutable answer hashes · empty cells mean no compared brand was detected.
| Public prompt | OpenAIopenai/gpt-4o-mini | Anthropicanthropic/claude-haiku-4-5 | Geminigoogle/gemini-2.5-flash |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01 Which AI content platforms are best for planning, drafting, editing, approving, publishing, and measuring business content?recommendation | JasperGrammarly | Jasper | Jasper |
| 02 Recommend an enterprise AI content platform that can enforce brand voice, terminology, claims, permissions, approvals, and governance.recommendation | Jasper · C1 | Writer · C1 | No selected brand |
| 03 Which AI content platforms are strongest for accurate long-form articles, briefs, reports, citations, revision, and human review?recommendation | JasperCopy.aiGrammarly | JasperCopy.ai | JasperCopy.ai |
| 04 Recommend an AI content platform for search-focused teams that need research, outlines, optimization, internal links, updates, and quality controls.recommendation | No selected brand | Jasper | No selected brand |
| 05 Which AI content platforms are best for producing coordinated campaign assets across web, email, social, ads, sales, and customer communications?recommendation | JasperCopy.ai | Jasper · C6Copy.ai | JasperCopy.ai |
| 06 Recommend an AI content platform for multilingual localization with terminology, tone, regional review, translation memory, and workflow controls.recommendation | No selected brand | No selected brand | No selected brand |
| 07 Which AI content platforms are strongest for regulated teams that need approved claims, citations, audit history, privacy, and mandatory review?recommendation | Writer | No selected brand | No selected brand |
| 08 Recommend an affordable AI content platform for a small marketing team that needs useful templates, collaboration, fast onboarding, and clear limits.recommendation | JasperCopy.ai | JasperCopy.ai | Jasper |
| 09 Compare AI content platforms on quality, factuality, brand control, workflows, channels, integrations, governance, analytics, and price.commercial | JasperCopy.ai | JasperCopy.ai | JasperCopy.ai |
| 10 Create a reproducible quality test for AI content platforms covering accuracy, originality, structure, tone, usefulness, editing effort, and citations.commercial | No selected brand | Grammarly | No selected brand |
| 11 Design a brand-control evaluation for AI content platforms using style rules, terminology, prohibited claims, examples, audiences, and channels.commercial | No selected brand | No selected brand | No selected brand |
| 12 Compare AI content platforms on briefs, assignments, collaboration, approvals, versioning, content systems, publishing, and performance feedback.commercial | No selected brand | JasperCopy.ai | No selected brand |
| 13 Compare AI content platforms on customer-data use, model training, retention, permissions, encryption, residency, audit logs, and deletion.commercial | No selected brand | No selected brand | No selected brand |
| 14 How should a buyer compare AI content platform pricing across seats, words, generations, brand workspaces, channels, integrations, and services?commercial | No selected brand | No selected brand | No selected brand |
| 15 Which criteria expose brand-model, template, workflow, asset, analytics, integration, export, and API lock-in in an AI content platform?commercial | No selected brand | No selected brand | No selected brand |
| 16 Create a shortlist of AI content platform vendors for a global company standardizing governed marketing and communications production.commercial | JasperCopy.aiGrammarly | No selected brand | Jasper · C1 |
Hostnames are derived from validated public HTTP(S) URLs, not provider-supplied domain labels.
| Source hostname | Cited answers | Distinct URLs | Engine breadth | Best position | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| youtube.com | 11 | 10 | 3 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| reddit.com | 6 | 7 | 3 | #2 | Open source ↗ |
| slatehq.com | 4 | 6 | 2 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| facebook.com | 4 | 4 | 2 | #2 | Open source ↗ |
| sciencedirect.com | 4 | 3 | 2 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| linkedin.com | 4 | 3 | 3 | #2 | Open source ↗ |
| getblend.com | 4 | 1 | 2 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| jasper.ai | 3 | 8 | 3 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| blog.hubspot.com | 3 | 4 | 3 | #2 | Open source ↗ |
| averi.ai | 3 | 3 | 1 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| glean.com | 3 | 3 | 1 | #5 | Open source ↗ |
| stackby.com | 3 | 1 | 2 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| canto.com | 3 | 1 | 2 | #2 | Open source ↗ |
| qa.yodo.me | 3 | 1 | 1 | #3 | Open source ↗ |
| aprimo.com | 2 | 5 | 2 | #3 | Open source ↗ |
| gridly.com | 2 | 4 | 2 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| monday.com | 2 | 3 | 2 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| experienceleague.adobe.com | 2 | 2 | 1 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov | 2 | 2 | 2 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| smartling.com | 2 | 2 | 2 | #1 | Open source ↗ |