BUYER PROMPT / PUBLISHED EVIDENCE
Which AI coding tool is best for understanding and modernizing a large legacy application with strong test coverage?
An exact prompt-level view of which reviewed brands surfaced and which public URLs the configured AI models cited. No answer text or tenant data is published.
- Intent
- recommendation
- Model providers
- 3
- Categories
- 1
- Last observed
- Jul 27, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC
COMPETITIVE OUTCOME
Brands surfaced
Ordered by provider breadth, then total mentions and owned-domain citations. A mention is not an endorsement or a position claim.
| # | Brand | Category | Providers | Mentions | Owned citations | Provider evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Cursorcursor.com ↗ | AI developer tools | 2 | 5 | 0 | Openai · Anthropic |
| 02 | GitHub Copilotgithub.com ↗ | AI developer tools | 2 | 5 | 0 | Openai · Anthropic |
| 03 | Claude Codeanthropic.com ↗ | AI developer tools | 1 | 7 | 0 | Anthropic |
| 04 | Augment Codeaugmentcode.com ↗ | AI developer tools | 1 | 0 | 1 | Gemini |
MODEL COMPARISON
Answer matrix
One row per configured provider and category snapshot. Hashes prove answer identity without publishing stored answer text.
| Provider | Model version | Category | Brands surfaced | Citations | Unique domains | Answer hash |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Openai | openai/gpt-4o-mini | AI developer tools | Cursor · GitHub Copilot | 5 | 5 | f46bdf19…574eb |
| Anthropic | anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5 | AI developer tools | Cursor · GitHub Copilot · Claude Code | 6 | 6 | c9ac8d20…c18d1 |
| Gemini | google/gemini-2.5-flash | AI developer tools | Augment Code | 6 | 6 | 60e614bb…dd8fc |
URL-DERIVED CITATIONS
Sources cited
Hostnames are derived from the returned public URLs. Best position is the smallest citation position observed.