Buyer prompt · published evidence

Compare commerce platforms on PCI scope, fraud, identity, privacy, auditability, residency, uptime, recovery, and regulated-product controls.

An exact prompt-level view of which reviewed brands surfaced and which public URLs the configured AI models cited. No answer text or tenant data is published.

Intent
commercial
Model providers
3
Categories
1
Last observed
Aug 23, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC
Competitive outcome

Brands surfaced

Ordered by provider breadth, then total mentions and owned-domain citations. A mention is not an endorsement or a position claim.

#BrandCategoryProvidersMentionsOwned citationsProvider evidence
Model comparison

Answer matrix

One row per configured provider and category snapshot. Hashes prove answer identity without publishing stored answer text.

ProviderModel versionCategoryBrands surfacedCitationsUnique domainsAnswer hash
Openaiopenai/gpt-4o-miniCommerceNone observed55d0868466…c78d4
Anthropicanthropic/claude-haiku-4-5CommerceNone observed00f1ac401c…56fb1
Geminigoogle/gemini-2.5-flashCommerceNone observed22b279f54f…482b2
URL-derived citations

Sources cited

Hostnames are derived from the returned public URLs. Best position is the smallest citation position observed.

Snapshot IDsb8d592fe-8d90-43eb-ba1e-75f21de5220d
Corpus versionscommerce-platforms-2026-07-27
Benchmark versions4-commerce-platforms-2026-07-27-models-64232fd32583

Coverage: Commerce. Full answers stored: no · Full answers published: no · Tenant data included: no.