Buyer prompt · published evidence

How should a software team compare coding-agent pricing, usage limits, premium-model access, and total cost at scale?

An exact prompt-level view of which reviewed brands surfaced and which public URLs the configured AI models cited. No answer text or tenant data is published.

Intent
commercial
Model providers
3
Categories
1
Last observed
Aug 8, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC
Competitive outcome

Brands surfaced

Ordered by provider breadth, then total mentions and owned-domain citations. A mention is not an endorsement or a position claim.

#BrandCategoryProvidersMentionsOwned citationsProvider evidence
01Claude Codeanthropic.comAI developer tools110Gemini
02OpenAI Codexopenai.comAI developer tools110Gemini
Model comparison

Answer matrix

One row per configured provider and category snapshot. Hashes prove answer identity without publishing stored answer text.

ProviderModel versionCategoryBrands surfacedCitationsUnique domainsAnswer hash
Openaiopenai/gpt-4o-miniAI developer toolsNone observed88b59db4c4…639aa
Anthropicanthropic/claude-haiku-4-5AI developer toolsNone observed00560a6cf3…e50af
Geminigoogle/gemini-2.5-flashAI developer toolsClaude Code · OpenAI Codex777c69467b…0dc70
URL-derived citations

Sources cited

Hostnames are derived from the returned public URLs. Best position is the smallest citation position observed.

Snapshot IDs8d5e955f-e3d2-4950-89b3-5ad22c6e0519
Corpus versionsai-developer-tools-2026-07-27
Benchmark versions4-ai-developer-tools-2026-07-27-models-64232fd32583

Coverage: AI developer tools. Full answers stored: no · Full answers published: no · Tenant data included: no.