Buyer prompt · published evidence
Create a proof-of-concept scorecard for evaluating AI coding tools on real repository tasks without relying on vendor claims.
An exact prompt-level view of which reviewed brands surfaced and which public URLs the configured AI models cited. No answer text or tenant data is published.
- Intent
- commercial
- Model providers
- 3
- Categories
- 1
- Last observed
- Aug 8, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC
Competitive outcome
Brands surfaced
Ordered by provider breadth, then total mentions and owned-domain citations. A mention is not an endorsement or a position claim.
| # | Brand | Category | Providers | Mentions | Owned citations | Provider evidence |
|---|
Model comparison
Answer matrix
One row per configured provider and category snapshot. Hashes prove answer identity without publishing stored answer text.
| Provider | Model version | Category | Brands surfaced | Citations | Unique domains | Answer hash |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Openai | openai/gpt-4o-mini | AI developer tools | None observed | 0 | 0 | a6df9bde…c1193 |
| Anthropic | anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5 | AI developer tools | None observed | 0 | 0 | 99364a44…144d7 |
| Gemini | google/gemini-2.5-flash | AI developer tools | None observed | 0 | 0 | 7376563f…dc133 |