BUYER PROMPT / PUBLISHED EVIDENCE
What analytics platform should a startup evaluate for fast setup, reasonable cost, embedded use, and low administration overhead?
An exact prompt-level view of which reviewed brands surfaced and which public URLs the configured AI models cited. No answer text or tenant data is published.
- Intent
- recommendation
- Model providers
- 3
- Categories
- 1
- Last observed
- Jul 27, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC
COMPETITIVE OUTCOME
Brands surfaced
Ordered by provider breadth, then total mentions and owned-domain citations. A mention is not an endorsement or a position claim.
| # | Brand | Category | Providers | Mentions | Owned citations | Provider evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Metabasemetabase.com ↗ | BI & Analytics | 3 | 6 | 1 | Openai · Anthropic · Gemini |
| 02 | Sisensesisense.com ↗ | BI & Analytics | 3 | 4 | 0 | Openai · Anthropic · Gemini |
| 03 | Microsoft Power BImicrosoft.com ↗ | BI & Analytics | 1 | 3 | 0 | Openai |
| 04 | Google Lookercloud.google.com ↗ | BI & Analytics | 1 | 1 | 0 | Gemini |
MODEL COMPARISON
Answer matrix
One row per configured provider and category snapshot. Hashes prove answer identity without publishing stored answer text.
| Provider | Model version | Category | Brands surfaced | Citations | Unique domains | Answer hash |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Openai | openai/gpt-4o-mini | BI & Analytics | Microsoft Power BI · Sisense · Metabase | 5 | 5 | c96953a6…f87a5 |
| Anthropic | anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5 | BI & Analytics | Sisense · Metabase | 8 | 3 | 056786b3…f9245 |
| Gemini | google/gemini-2.5-flash | BI & Analytics | Google Looker · Sisense · Metabase | 8 | 8 | dc7a1941…32978 |
URL-DERIVED CITATIONS
Sources cited
Hostnames are derived from the returned public URLs. Best position is the smallest citation position observed.