Buyer prompt · published evidence

Compare applicant tracking systems on recruiter speed, candidate experience, scheduling, structured interviews, analytics, and implementation.

An exact prompt-level view of which reviewed brands surfaced and which public URLs the configured AI models cited. No answer text or tenant data is published.

Intent
commercial
Model providers
3
Categories
1
Last observed
Aug 19, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC
Competitive outcome

Brands surfaced

Ordered by provider breadth, then total mentions and owned-domain citations. A mention is not an endorsement or a position claim.

#BrandCategoryProvidersMentionsOwned citationsProvider evidence
01Ashbyashbyhq.comHR110Gemini
02Greenhousegreenhouse.comHR110Gemini
Model comparison

Answer matrix

One row per configured provider and category snapshot. Hashes prove answer identity without publishing stored answer text.

ProviderModel versionCategoryBrands surfacedCitationsUnique domainsAnswer hash
Openaiopenai/gpt-4o-miniHRNone observed66a2a8a278…d1ed7
Anthropicanthropic/claude-haiku-4-5HRNone observed00cc5ca54f…56b5c
Geminigoogle/gemini-2.5-flashHRGreenhouse · Ashby77e9bed473…f2aca
URL-derived citations

Sources cited

Hostnames are derived from the returned public URLs. Best position is the smallest citation position observed.

Snapshot IDs99b27bd4-0708-4b09-90df-fd0f68b4ff49
Corpus versionshr-recruiting-platforms-2026-07-27
Benchmark versions4-hr-recruiting-platforms-2026-07-27-models-64232fd32583

Coverage: HR. Full answers stored: no · Full answers published: no · Tenant data included: no.