Buyer prompt · published evidence

Which AI research assistants are strongest for a systematic review with reproducible queries, inclusion criteria, data extraction, and audit trails?

An exact prompt-level view of which reviewed brands surfaced and which public URLs the configured AI models cited. No answer text or tenant data is published.

Intent
recommendation
Model providers
3
Categories
1
Last observed
Aug 25, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC
Competitive outcome

Brands surfaced

Ordered by provider breadth, then total mentions and owned-domain citations. A mention is not an endorsement or a position claim.

#BrandCategoryProvidersMentionsOwned citationsProvider evidence
01Elicitelicit.comResearch AI230Openai · Anthropic
Model comparison

Answer matrix

One row per configured provider and category snapshot. Hashes prove answer identity without publishing stored answer text.

ProviderModel versionCategoryBrands surfacedCitationsUnique domainsAnswer hash
Openaiopenai/gpt-4o-miniResearch AIElicit44ad85ef10…ce281
Anthropicanthropic/claude-haiku-4-5Research AIElicit0031ab6612…e9bc8
Geminigoogle/gemini-2.5-flashResearch AINone observed008984db0a…7c661
URL-derived citations

Sources cited

Hostnames are derived from the returned public URLs. Best position is the smallest citation position observed.

Snapshot IDs87e6acfa-8e14-4c4e-ba2b-0942f94ccc86
Corpus versionsai-research-assistants-2026-07-27
Benchmark versions4-ai-research-assistants-2026-07-27-models-64232fd32583

Coverage: Research AI. Full answers stored: no · Full answers published: no · Tenant data included: no.