Buyer prompt · published evidence
Which AI research assistants are best for commercial due diligence that must distinguish filings, company claims, estimates, and third-party evidence?
An exact prompt-level view of which reviewed brands surfaced and which public URLs the configured AI models cited. No answer text or tenant data is published.
- Intent
- recommendation
- Model providers
- 3
- Categories
- 1
- Last observed
- Aug 25, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC
Competitive outcome
Brands surfaced
Ordered by provider breadth, then total mentions and owned-domain citations. A mention is not an endorsement or a position claim.
| # | Brand | Category | Providers | Mentions | Owned citations | Provider evidence |
|---|
Model comparison
Answer matrix
One row per configured provider and category snapshot. Hashes prove answer identity without publishing stored answer text.
| Provider | Model version | Category | Brands surfaced | Citations | Unique domains | Answer hash |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Openai | openai/gpt-4o-mini | Research AI | None observed | 6 | 6 | cb37d81b…05fbd |
| Anthropic | anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5 | Research AI | None observed | 0 | 0 | c174811c…429ca |
| Gemini | google/gemini-2.5-flash | Research AI | None observed | 8 | 8 | 0fcd15dc…6db9c |
URL-derived citations
Sources cited
Hostnames are derived from the returned public URLs. Best position is the smallest citation position observed.