Buyer prompt · published evidence

Compare AI research assistants on retrieval coverage, source quality, citation accuracy, synthesis, exports, collaboration, privacy, and price.

An exact prompt-level view of which reviewed brands surfaced and which public URLs the configured AI models cited. No answer text or tenant data is published.

Intent
commercial
Model providers
3
Categories
1
Last observed
Aug 25, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC
Competitive outcome

Brands surfaced

Ordered by provider breadth, then total mentions and owned-domain citations. A mention is not an endorsement or a position claim.

#BrandCategoryProvidersMentionsOwned citationsProvider evidence
01Elicitelicit.comResearch AI130Gemini
02Consensusconsensus.appResearch AI110Gemini
03Perplexityperplexity.aiResearch AI110Gemini
04Semantic Scholarsemanticscholar.orgResearch AI110Gemini
Model comparison

Answer matrix

One row per configured provider and category snapshot. Hashes prove answer identity without publishing stored answer text.

ProviderModel versionCategoryBrands surfacedCitationsUnique domainsAnswer hash
Openaiopenai/gpt-4o-miniResearch AINone observed00f878efc1…5a7ef
Anthropicanthropic/claude-haiku-4-5Research AINone observed00d39bf2d2…aebc0
Geminigoogle/gemini-2.5-flashResearch AIPerplexity · Elicit · Consensus · Semantic Scholar77f56bfd78…b1fd5
URL-derived citations

Sources cited

Hostnames are derived from the returned public URLs. Best position is the smallest citation position observed.

Snapshot IDs87e6acfa-8e14-4c4e-ba2b-0942f94ccc86
Corpus versionsai-research-assistants-2026-07-27
Benchmark versions4-ai-research-assistants-2026-07-27-models-64232fd32583

Coverage: Research AI. Full answers stored: no · Full answers published: no · Tenant data included: no.