Buyer prompt · published evidence
What is the best tool for analyzing the citations and sources that influence AI search responses?
An exact prompt-level view of which reviewed brands surfaced and which public URLs the configured AI models cited. No answer text or tenant data is published.
- Intent
- recommendation
- Model providers
- 3
- Categories
- 1
- Last observed
- Sep 11, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC
Competitive outcome
Brands surfaced
Ordered by provider breadth, then total mentions and owned-domain citations. A mention is not an endorsement or a position claim.
| # | Brand | Category | Providers | Mentions | Owned citations | Provider evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Otterly AIotterly.ai ↗ | AEO platforms | 1 | 1 | 1 | Openai |
| 02 | Peec AIpeec.ai ↗ | AEO platforms | 1 | 1 | 0 | Openai |
Model comparison
Answer matrix
One row per configured provider and category snapshot. Hashes prove answer identity without publishing stored answer text.
| Provider | Model version | Category | Brands surfaced | Citations | Unique domains | Answer hash |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Openai | openai/gpt-4o-mini | AEO platforms | Peec AI · Otterly AI | 3 | 3 | ded1202c…dccc1 |
| Anthropic | anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5 | AEO platforms | None observed | 6 | 6 | ae70ad15…f5b2d |
| Gemini | google/gemini-2.5-flash | AEO platforms | None observed | 3 | 1 | 8b5c01bd…3826a |
URL-derived citations
Sources cited
Hostnames are derived from the returned public URLs. Best position is the smallest citation position observed.