Published method
Public Legal AI brand benchmark
4-legal-ai-platforms-2026-07-27-models-64232fd32583
Version
Jul 27, 2026
Published
7
Boards
public-legal-ai-platforms
Method ID
Where the facts come from
- Providers
- Provider
openai
- Configured Model
openai/gpt-4o-mini
- Provider
anthropic
- Configured Model
anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5
- Provider
gemini
- Configured Model
google/gemini-2.5-flash
- Provider Views
- Provider
openai
- Board Slug
legal-ai-platforms-brand-openai-visibility
- Primary Metric Slug
public-prompt-openai-brand-recommendation-presence
- Provider
anthropic
- Board Slug
legal-ai-platforms-brand-anthropic-visibility
- Primary Metric Slug
public-prompt-anthropic-brand-recommendation-presence
- Provider
gemini
- Board Slug
legal-ai-platforms-brand-gemini-visibility
- Primary Metric Slug
public-prompt-gemini-brand-recommendation-presence
- Provider Matrix Version
64232fd32583
How the order is produced
recommendation-prompt presence descending; mention coverage, engine breadth, mention share, citation share, then entity slug
When the method reruns
- The prompt boards are re-run in rotation, about one category a day, so each board refreshes every few weeks and shows the date of its snapshot.
Boards
Boards using this version
| Board | Primary measure | Rows | Confidence | Snapshot | Board version | Refresh | Board |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Legal AI rank | public-prompt-brand-recommendation-presence | 12 | 100% | Oct 8, 2026 | 4-legal-ai-platforms-2026-07-27-models-64232fd32583 | Rotating schedule | Open the board: Legal AI rank |
| Legal AI presence | public-prompt-brand-mention-coverage | 12 | 100% | Oct 8, 2026 | 4-legal-ai-platforms-2026-07-27-models-64232fd32583 | Rotating schedule | Open the board: Legal AI presence |
| Legal AI citation share | public-prompt-brand-citation-share | 12 | 100% | Oct 8, 2026 | 4-legal-ai-platforms-2026-07-27-models-64232fd32583 | Rotating schedule | Open the board: Legal AI citation share |
| Legal AI engine breadth | public-prompt-brand-engine-breadth | 12 | 100% | Oct 8, 2026 | 4-legal-ai-platforms-2026-07-27-models-64232fd32583 | Rotating schedule | Open the board: Legal AI engine breadth |
| Legal AI in OpenAI model API answers | public-prompt-openai-brand-recommendation-presence | 12 | 100% | Oct 8, 2026 | 4-legal-ai-platforms-2026-07-27-models-64232fd32583 | Rotating schedule | Open the board: Legal AI in OpenAI model API answers |
| Legal AI in Anthropic model API answers | public-prompt-anthropic-brand-recommendation-presence | 12 | 100% | Oct 8, 2026 | 4-legal-ai-platforms-2026-07-27-models-64232fd32583 | Rotating schedule | Open the board: Legal AI in Anthropic model API answers |
| Legal AI in Gemini model API answers | public-prompt-gemini-brand-recommendation-presence | 12 | 100% | Oct 8, 2026 | 4-legal-ai-platforms-2026-07-27-models-64232fd32583 | Rotating schedule | Open the board: Legal AI in Gemini model API answers |
Versioned contract
Complete measurement ledger
Cohort
Not specified.
Prompts
- Slug
best-legal-ai-platform
- Text
Which legal AI platforms are best for research, drafting, review, analysis, citations, workflow, security, and professional accountability?
- Intent
recommendation
- Slug
legal-ai-research
- Text
Recommend a legal AI platform for cited case, statute, regulation, secondary-source, and jurisdiction-specific research with verification.
- Intent
recommendation
- Slug
legal-ai-contract-review
- Text
Which legal AI platforms are strongest for contract review, extraction, playbooks, redlines, risk, comparison, and approval workflows?
- Intent
recommendation
- Slug
legal-ai-drafting
- Text
Recommend a legal AI platform for drafting and revising agreements, briefs, memos, correspondence, clauses, and transaction documents.
- Intent
recommendation
- Slug
legal-ai-litigation
- Text
Which legal AI platforms are best for litigation teams handling discovery, chronologies, evidence, depositions, motions, authorities, and case strategy?
- Intent
recommendation
- Slug
legal-ai-in-house
- Text
Recommend a legal AI platform for an in-house team managing contracts, requests, policies, knowledge, outside counsel, and business self-service.
- Intent
recommendation
- Slug
legal-ai-law-firm
- Text
Which legal AI platforms are strongest for a law firm that needs matter controls, knowledge integration, auditability, adoption, and support?
- Intent
recommendation
- Slug
legal-ai-small-practice
- Text
Recommend an affordable legal AI platform for a small practice that needs reliable research, drafting, document review, and clear limits.
- Intent
recommendation
- Slug
legal-ai-buying-criteria
- Text
Compare legal AI platforms on accuracy, citations, jurisdictions, workflows, integrations, confidentiality, governance, support, and price.
- Intent
commercial
- Slug
legal-ai-accuracy-test
- Text
Create a reproducible legal AI evaluation covering authority validity, citation support, jurisdiction, dates, holdings, exceptions, and hallucinations.
- Intent
commercial
- Slug
legal-ai-contract-test
- Text
Design a contract-review benchmark for legal AI using known clauses, missing terms, conflicts, defined terms, playbooks, redlines, and explanations.
- Intent
commercial
- Slug
legal-ai-security
- Text
Compare legal AI platforms on privilege, confidentiality, model training, retention, encryption, permissions, residency, audit logs, and deletion.
- Intent
commercial
- Slug
legal-ai-integrations
- Text
Compare legal AI platforms on document, matter, contract, research, billing, email, identity, knowledge, API, and workflow integrations.
- Intent
commercial
- Slug
legal-ai-pricing
- Text
How should a buyer compare legal AI pricing across users, matters, documents, research content, modules, implementation, and support?
- Intent
commercial
- Slug
legal-ai-lock-in
- Text
Which criteria expose research, document, playbook, clause, knowledge, matter, workflow, export, and API lock-in in a legal AI platform?
- Intent
commercial
- Slug
legal-ai-shortlist
- Text
Create a shortlist of legal AI vendors for a regulated organization standardizing governed legal research and document workflows.
- Intent
commercial
Category
legal-ai-platforms
Providers
- Provider
openai
- Configured Model
openai/gpt-4o-mini
- Provider
anthropic
- Configured Model
anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5
- Provider
gemini
- Configured Model
google/gemini-2.5-flash
Cost Policy
- Cost Basis
Provider-reported LLM cost returned by the existing AI Rank provider/cache layer.
- Maximum Daily Billed Cost Usd
2.00
- Maximum Daily Provider Calls
60
- Maximum Daily Provider Attempts Including Retries
72
Limitations
- This is one response per prompt/provider pair in each run; model output can vary between runs.
- The fixed 16-prompt Legal AI category does not estimate general market share or brand awareness.
- Presence share and citation share are relative only to the reviewed 12-brand universe; untracked brands are excluded from those denominators.
- OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google are both evaluated brands and configured model providers; no self-provider bias correction is applied.
Rank Formula
recommendation-prompt presence descending; mention coverage, engine breadth, mention share, citation share, then entity slug
Answer Policy
- Published Evidence
answer hashes, deterministic bounded brand counts, and deduplicated URL-derived citation counts
- Full Provider Answers Published
No
- Full Provider Answers Stored In Public Index
No
Corpus Version
legal-ai-platforms-2026-07-27
Provider Views
- Provider
openai
- Board Slug
legal-ai-platforms-brand-openai-visibility
- Primary Metric Slug
public-prompt-openai-brand-recommendation-presence
- Provider
anthropic
- Board Slug
legal-ai-platforms-brand-anthropic-visibility
- Primary Metric Slug
public-prompt-anthropic-brand-recommendation-presence
- Provider
gemini
- Board Slug
legal-ai-platforms-brand-gemini-visibility
- Primary Metric Slug
public-prompt-gemini-brand-recommendation-presence
Runner Version
4
Canonical Brands
- Name
Harvey
- Aliases
- Harvey
- Harvey AI
- Entity Slug
harvey-ai
- Primary Domain
harvey.ai
- Citation Domains
- harvey.ai
- Case Sensitive Aliases
- Harvey
- Name
CoCounsel
- Aliases
- CoCounsel
- Thomson Reuters CoCounsel
- Entity Slug
thomson-reuters-cocounsel
- Primary Domain
thomsonreuters.com
- Citation Domains
- thomsonreuters.com
- Case Sensitive Aliases
- Name
Lexis+ AI
- Aliases
- Lexis+ AI
- Lexis AI
- Entity Slug
lexis-plus-ai
- Primary Domain
lexisnexis.com
- Citation Domains
- lexisnexis.com
- Case Sensitive Aliases
- Name
vLex Vincent AI
- Aliases
- vLex Vincent AI
- Vincent AI
- Entity Slug
vlex-vincent-ai
- Primary Domain
vlex.com
- Citation Domains
- vlex.com
- Case Sensitive Aliases
- Name
Clio Duo
- Aliases
- Clio Duo
- Entity Slug
clio-duo
- Primary Domain
clio.com
- Citation Domains
- clio.com
- help.clio.com
- Case Sensitive Aliases
- Name
Spellbook
- Aliases
- Spellbook
- Spellbook Legal
- Entity Slug
spellbook
- Primary Domain
spellbook.legal
- Citation Domains
- spellbook.legal
- Case Sensitive Aliases
- Spellbook
- Name
Luminance
- Aliases
- Luminance
- Luminance AI
- Entity Slug
luminance
- Primary Domain
luminance.com
- Citation Domains
- luminance.com
- Case Sensitive Aliases
- Name
Legora
- Aliases
- Legora
- Legora AI
- Entity Slug
legora
- Primary Domain
legora.com
- Citation Domains
- legora.com
- Case Sensitive Aliases
- Name
Hebbia
- Aliases
- Hebbia
- Hebbia Matrix
- Entity Slug
hebbia
- Primary Domain
hebbia.ai
- Citation Domains
- hebbia.ai
- Case Sensitive Aliases
- Name
Evisort
- Aliases
- Evisort
- Evisort AI
- Entity Slug
evisort
- Primary Domain
evisort.com
- Citation Domains
- evisort.com
- Case Sensitive Aliases
- Name
Ironclad AI
- Aliases
- Ironclad AI
- Ironclad Jurist
- Entity Slug
ironclad-ai
- Primary Domain
ironcladapp.com
- Citation Domains
- ironcladapp.com
- support.ironcladapp.com
- Case Sensitive Aliases
- Name
Paxton AI
- Aliases
- Paxton AI
- Entity Slug
paxton-ai
- Primary Domain
paxton.ai
- Citation Domains
- paxton.ai
- Case Sensitive Aliases
Benchmark Version
4-legal-ai-platforms-2026-07-27-models-64232fd32583
Evaluation Surface
- Search
A common Rank.ai web-search tool is available to all three configured models.
- Gateway
Rank.ai's configured OpenRouter-compatible gateway
- Not Consumer Products
Results measure the configured model/API runs, not the ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini consumer application interfaces.
Strict Completeness
- Prompt Count
16
- Provider Count
3
- Required Successful Runs
48
Measurement Semantics
- Confidence
A value of 1.0 means the complete frozen cohort passed the deterministic extraction and publication gates; it is not a statistical confidence interval.
- Citation Share Denominator
Distinct answer-level HTTP(S) citation URLs whose URL-derived hostname matches any reviewed brand domain.
- Presence Share Denominator
The sum of reviewed-brand answer-presences. One answer may contribute presence to multiple brands.
- Mention Coverage Denominator
48 answers: all 16 prompts multiplied by 3 configured providers.
- Provider Citation Share Denominator
Distinct reviewed-brand-domain citations within the named configured model API provider's 20-answer cohort.
- Recommendation Presence Denominator
24 answers: recommendation-intent prompts multiplied by 3 configured providers.
- Provider Mention Coverage Denominator
16 prompts for the named configured model API provider.
- Provider Recommendation Presence Denominator
8 recommendation-intent prompts for the named configured model API provider.
Provider Matrix Version
64232fd32583
Recommendation Semantics
Presence means mentioned or cited in an answer to a recommendation-intent prompt. It does not claim positive recommendation, endorsement, or sentiment.
See how often AI names you.
Enter your website. In about two minutes, Rank.ai asks ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini 12 questions your customers ask and grades how often they name you.
- Your grade out of 100How often AI names you, cites your site, and how high it ranks you.
- Who gets namedEvery competitor in the answers, most named first.
- The pages AI readsThe sources behind each answer.
- Three fixesWhat to fix first, with a brief for the first article.