Published method
Public AI Research Assistants prompt leaders, engine disagreement, and citation opportunity
2-parent-6aaaab55f8f6a3e3
Version
Jul 27, 2026
Published
3
Boards
ai-research-assistants-prompt-insights
Method ID
Where the facts come from
- Providers
- openai
- anthropic
- gemini
- Provider Matrix Version
64232fd32583
How the order is produced
The board publishes its primary raw measure without an undisclosed transformation.
When the method reruns
- The prompt boards are re-run in rotation, about one category a day, so each board refreshes every few weeks and shows the date of its snapshot.
Boards
Boards using this version
| Board | Primary measure | Rows | Confidence | Snapshot | Board version | Refresh | Board |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI research assistants buying prompt leaders | public-prompt-leading-brand-consensus | 16 | 100% | Oct 3, 2026 | 2-parent-6aaaab55f8f6a3e3 | Rotating schedule | Open the board: AI research assistants buying prompt leaders |
| AI research assistants engine disagreement | public-prompt-engine-disagreement | 16 | 100% | Oct 3, 2026 | 2-parent-6aaaab55f8f6a3e3 | Rotating schedule | Open the board: AI research assistants engine disagreement |
| AI research assistants prompt citation opportunities | public-prompt-leading-brand-owned-citation-gap | 16 | 100% | Oct 3, 2026 | 2-parent-6aaaab55f8f6a3e3 | Rotating schedule | Open the board: AI research assistants prompt citation opportunities |
Versioned contract
Complete measurement ledger
Cohort
Not specified.
Prompts
- Slug
best-ai-research-assistant
- Text
Which AI research assistants are best for finding, synthesizing, and citing reliable sources across complex questions?
- Intent
recommendation
- Slug
ai-research-scientific-literature
- Text
Recommend an AI research assistant for scientific literature search, paper screening, evidence extraction, synthesis, and traceable citations.
- Intent
recommendation
- Slug
ai-research-systematic-review
- Text
Which AI research assistants are strongest for a systematic review with reproducible queries, inclusion criteria, data extraction, and audit trails?
- Intent
recommendation
- Slug
ai-research-market-company
- Text
Recommend an AI research assistant for company, market, competitor, and industry research using current public sources with citations.
- Intent
recommendation
- Slug
ai-research-due-diligence
- Text
Which AI research assistants are best for commercial due diligence that must distinguish filings, company claims, estimates, and third-party evidence?
- Intent
recommendation
- Slug
ai-research-enterprise
- Text
Recommend an enterprise AI research assistant with private-data controls, team workspaces, source permissions, administration, and compliance.
- Intent
recommendation
- Slug
ai-research-current-web
- Text
Which AI research assistants are strongest for current web research that requires broad retrieval, source diversity, recency, and cited synthesis?
- Intent
recommendation
- Slug
ai-research-student
- Text
Recommend an affordable AI research assistant for a student who needs source discovery, paper explanations, citation checking, and note organization.
- Intent
recommendation
- Slug
ai-research-buying-criteria
- Text
Compare AI research assistants on retrieval coverage, source quality, citation accuracy, synthesis, exports, collaboration, privacy, and price.
- Intent
commercial
- Slug
ai-research-citation-test
- Text
Create a reproducible citation-accuracy test for AI research assistants covering source existence, claim support, quotation, attribution, and recency.
- Intent
commercial
- Slug
ai-research-retrieval-test
- Text
Design a retrieval benchmark for AI research assistants using known-item search, long-tail evidence, conflicting sources, dates, and paywalled material.
- Intent
commercial
- Slug
ai-research-synthesis-test
- Text
How should buyers compare AI research assistants on completeness, uncertainty, contradiction handling, evidence weighting, and unsupported claims?
- Intent
commercial
- Slug
ai-research-pricing
- Text
Compare AI research assistant pricing across seats, searches, reports, document uploads, premium sources, exports, APIs, and enterprise controls.
- Intent
commercial
- Slug
ai-research-security
- Text
Compare AI research assistants on uploaded-document privacy, model training, retention, permissions, encryption, residency, audit logs, and deletion.
- Intent
commercial
- Slug
ai-research-lock-in
- Text
Which criteria expose library, annotation, citation, report, workspace, source-access, export, and API lock-in in an AI research assistant?
- Intent
commercial
- Slug
ai-research-shortlist
- Text
Create a shortlist of AI research assistant vendors for an evidence-heavy organization replacing ad hoc search and manual research briefs.
- Intent
commercial
Providers
- openai
- anthropic
- gemini
Corpus Version
ai-research-assistants-2026-07-27
Leader Formula
Highest provider presence; then total deterministic alias mentions, reviewed-domain citations, and brand slug.
Empty Set Policy
Two empty provider brand sets have zero disagreement.
Leader Semantics
Leading means most consistently present among reviewed brands. It does not claim endorsement or positive sentiment.
Disagreement Formula
100 multiplied by the mean pairwise Jaccard distance among the reviewed-brand sets surfaced by configured engines.
Raw Answers Published
No
Provider Matrix Version
64232fd32583
Owned Citation Gap Formula
Leading-brand engine consensus minus leading-brand owned-citation engine coverage.
Parent Methodology Version
4-ai-research-assistants-2026-07-27-models-64232fd32583
Owned Citation Coverage Formula
Configured engines whose answer cites the leading reviewed brand's canonical domains divided by configured engines.
See how often AI names you.
Enter your website. In about two minutes, Rank.ai asks ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini 12 questions your customers ask and grades how often they name you.
- Your grade out of 100How often AI names you, cites your site, and how high it ranks you.
- Who gets namedEvery competitor in the answers, most named first.
- The pages AI readsThe sources behind each answer.
- Three fixesWhat to fix first, with a brief for the first article.