Loading ranking table…
Loading the latest published snapshot and its supporting evidence.
LIVE RANKINGS & DATA
Loading the latest published snapshot and its supporting evidence.
Ranks Legal AI prompts where the leading reviewed brand appears across engines but its own domains are not cited.
Compare one brand with up to three competitors across the exact public prompt × engine matrix behind this leaderboard.
| Brand | Presence | Vs. primary | Selected share | Mentions | Cited answers | Owned URL signals | Engine breadth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harveyharvey.ai | 47.9%23/48 | BASE | 42.6% | 78 | 9 | 9 | 3/3 |
| CoCounselthomsonreuters.com | 33.3%16/48 | -14.6 pp | 29.6% | 51 | 7 | 7 | 3/3 |
| Lexis+ AIlexisnexis.com | 27.1%13/48 | -20.8 pp | 24.1% | 22 | 4 | 4 | 3/3 |
| vLex Vincent AIvlex.com | 4.2%2/48 | -43.8 pp | 3.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2/3 |
16 prompts · 48 immutable answer hashes · empty cells mean no compared brand was detected.
| Public prompt | OpenAIopenai/gpt-4o-mini | Anthropicanthropic/claude-haiku-4-5 | Geminigoogle/gemini-2.5-flash |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01 Which legal AI platforms are best for research, drafting, review, analysis, citations, workflow, security, and professional accountability?recommendation | CoCounsel · C1 | HarveyCoCounsel · C1Lexis+ AI · C1 | CoCounsel · C1 |
| 02 Recommend a legal AI platform for cited case, statute, regulation, secondary-source, and jurisdiction-specific research with verification.recommendation | CoCounsel | Lexis+ AI | No selected brand |
| 03 Which legal AI platforms are strongest for contract review, extraction, playbooks, redlines, risk, comparison, and approval workflows?recommendation | Harvey | Harvey | No selected brand |
| 04 Recommend a legal AI platform for drafting and revising agreements, briefs, memos, correspondence, clauses, and transaction documents.recommendation | HarveyLexis+ AI · C1 | CoCounsel | Harvey |
| 05 Which legal AI platforms are best for litigation teams handling discovery, chronologies, evidence, depositions, motions, authorities, and case strategy?recommendation | Lexis+ AI | No selected brand | No selected brand |
| 06 Recommend a legal AI platform for an in-house team managing contracts, requests, policies, knowledge, outside counsel, and business self-service.recommendation | Harvey | No selected brand | Harvey · C1Lexis+ AI · C1 |
| 07 Which legal AI platforms are strongest for a law firm that needs matter controls, knowledge integration, auditability, adoption, and support?recommendation | CoCounsel · C1Lexis+ AI | HarveyCoCounselLexis+ AI | Harvey · C1 |
| 08 Recommend an affordable legal AI platform for a small practice that needs reliable research, drafting, document review, and clear limits.recommendation | HarveyCoCounsel | No selected brand | CoCounsel |
| 09 Compare legal AI platforms on accuracy, citations, jurisdictions, workflows, integrations, confidentiality, governance, support, and price.commercial | HarveyCoCounsel | HarveyCoCounsel · C1Lexis+ AI | HarveyCoCounsel · C1Lexis+ AI |
| 10 Create a reproducible legal AI evaluation covering authority validity, citation support, jurisdiction, dates, holdings, exceptions, and hallucinations.commercial | No selected brand | No selected brand | No selected brand |
| 11 Design a contract-review benchmark for legal AI using known clauses, missing terms, conflicts, defined terms, playbooks, redlines, and explanations.commercial | No selected brand | No selected brand | Harvey · C1 |
| 12 Compare legal AI platforms on privilege, confidentiality, model training, retention, encryption, permissions, residency, audit logs, and deletion.commercial | vLex Vincent AI · C1 | HarveyCoCounselLexis+ AI | vLex Vincent AI · C1 |
| 13 Compare legal AI platforms on document, matter, contract, research, billing, email, identity, knowledge, API, and workflow integrations.commercial | Harvey | Harvey · C1CoCounselLexis+ AI | Harvey · C1 |
| 14 How should a buyer compare legal AI pricing across users, matters, documents, research content, modules, implementation, and support?commercial | No selected brand | CoCounsel · C1Lexis+ AI · C1 | No selected brand |
| 15 Which criteria expose research, document, playbook, clause, knowledge, matter, workflow, export, and API lock-in in a legal AI platform?commercial | No selected brand | Harvey · C1 | Harvey · C1 |
| 16 Create a shortlist of legal AI vendors for a regulated organization standardizing governed legal research and document workflows.commercial | Harvey · C1 | Harvey | Harvey · C1CoCounselLexis+ AI |
Hostnames are derived from validated public HTTP(S) URLs, not provider-supplied domain labels.
| Source hostname | Cited answers | Distinct URLs | Engine breadth | Best position | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| clio.com | 15 | 13 | 3 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| reddit.com | 14 | 12 | 3 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| mycase.com | 14 | 2 | 3 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| darrow.ai | 12 | 1 | 3 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| spellbook.com | 10 | 9 | 3 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| legalfly.com | 10 | 6 | 3 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| harvey.ai | 9 | 6 | 3 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| gc.ai | 8 | 11 | 3 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| linkedin.com | 8 | 8 | 3 | #2 | Open source ↗ |
| ironcladapp.com | 8 | 4 | 3 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| legal.thomsonreuters.com | 7 | 4 | 3 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| legalontech.com | 7 | 4 | 2 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| leanlaw.co | 7 | 2 | 3 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| eve.legal | 6 | 2 | 3 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| youtube.com | 5 | 5 | 2 | #3 | Open source ↗ |
| legaltechnologyhub.com | 4 | 4 | 3 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| lexisnexis.com | 4 | 4 | 3 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| americanbar.org | 4 | 3 | 2 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| jdsupra.com | 4 | 3 | 2 | #3 | Open source ↗ |
| nexlaw.ai | 4 | 3 | 1 | #3 | Open source ↗ |
Derives prompt-level brand leaders, cross-engine brand-set disagreement, and leading-brand owned-citation opportunity from the complete public Rank.ai benchmark cohort.
Some explanation inputs are unavailable Missing: comparablePriorRanking.
| Component | Value | Weight | Contribution | Evidence | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| public prompt brand presence events | 3 | 0% | — | 1 | available |
| public prompt citation urls | 19 | 0% | — | 1 | available |
| public prompt distinct reviewed brands |
| 2 |
| 0% |
| — |
| 1 |
| available |
| public prompt engine disagreement | 66.666667 | 0% | — | 1 | available |
|---|
| public prompt leading brand consensus | 66.666667 | 0% | — | 1 | available |
|---|
| public prompt leading brand owned citation coverage | 66.666667 | 0% | — | 1 | available |
|---|
| public prompt leading brand owned citation gap | 0 | 100% | 0 | 1 | available |
|---|
no_prior_published_snapshot
No comparable component drivers were published.
{"promptSlug":"legal-ai-lock-in","corpusVersion":"legal-ai-platforms-2026-07-27","runArtifactIds":["37c12aed-3fa5-4c45-845d-469cef87abad","7b1a7cd2-ab15-4689-b778-41417dec5862","5c9f0985-9b97-4665-88c3-323c5ed2bc15"],"parentSnapshotId":"7469f302-796d-4ba4-a3b9-5005160c89bb","providerMatrixVersion":"64232fd32583"}{"promptSlug":"legal-ai-lock-in","corpusVersion":"legal-ai-platforms-2026-07-27","runArtifactIds":["37c12aed-3fa5-4c45-845d-469cef87abad","7b1a7cd2-ab15-4689-b778-41417dec5862","5c9f0985-9b97-4665-88c3-323c5ed2bc15"],"parentSnapshotId":"7469f302-796d-4ba4-a3b9-5005160c89bb","providerMatrixVersion":"64232fd32583"}{"promptSlug":"legal-ai-lock-in","corpusVersion":"legal-ai-platforms-2026-07-27","runArtifactIds":["37c12aed-3fa5-4c45-845d-469cef87abad","7b1a7cd2-ab15-4689-b778-41417dec5862","5c9f0985-9b97-4665-88c3-323c5ed2bc15"],"parentSnapshotId":"7469f302-796d-4ba4-a3b9-5005160c89bb","providerMatrixVersion":"64232fd32583"}{"promptSlug":"legal-ai-lock-in","corpusVersion":"legal-ai-platforms-2026-07-27","runArtifactIds":["37c12aed-3fa5-4c45-845d-469cef87abad","7b1a7cd2-ab15-4689-b778-41417dec5862","5c9f0985-9b97-4665-88c3-323c5ed2bc15"],"parentSnapshotId":"7469f302-796d-4ba4-a3b9-5005160c89bb","providerMatrixVersion":"64232fd32583"}{"promptSlug":"legal-ai-lock-in","corpusVersion":"legal-ai-platforms-2026-07-27","runArtifactIds":["37c12aed-3fa5-4c45-845d-469cef87abad","7b1a7cd2-ab15-4689-b778-41417dec5862","5c9f0985-9b97-4665-88c3-323c5ed2bc15"],"parentSnapshotId":"7469f302-796d-4ba4-a3b9-5005160c89bb","providerMatrixVersion":"64232fd32583"}{"promptSlug":"legal-ai-lock-in","corpusVersion":"legal-ai-platforms-2026-07-27","runArtifactIds":["37c12aed-3fa5-4c45-845d-469cef87abad","7b1a7cd2-ab15-4689-b778-41417dec5862","5c9f0985-9b97-4665-88c3-323c5ed2bc15"],"parentSnapshotId":"7469f302-796d-4ba4-a3b9-5005160c89bb","providerMatrixVersion":"64232fd32583"}{"promptSlug":"legal-ai-lock-in","corpusVersion":"legal-ai-platforms-2026-07-27","runArtifactIds":["37c12aed-3fa5-4c45-845d-469cef87abad","7b1a7cd2-ab15-4689-b778-41417dec5862","5c9f0985-9b97-4665-88c3-323c5ed2bc15"],"parentSnapshotId":"7469f302-796d-4ba4-a3b9-5005160c89bb","providerMatrixVersion":"64232fd32583"}