Loading ranking table…
Loading the latest published snapshot and its supporting evidence.
LIVE RANKINGS & DATA
Loading the latest published snapshot and its supporting evidence.
Ranks AI Developer Tools prompts by how differently the configured engines surface the reviewed brand universe.
Compare one brand with up to three competitors across the exact public prompt × engine matrix behind this leaderboard.
| Brand | Presence | Vs. primary | Selected share | Mentions | Cited answers | Owned URL signals | Engine breadth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GitHub Copilotgithub.com | 50.0%18/36 | +16.7 pp | 40.9% | 48 | 6 | 9 | 3/3 |
| Claude Codeanthropic.com | 36.1%13/36 | +2.8 pp | 29.5% | 44 | 1 | 1 | 3/3 |
| Cursorcursor.com | 33.3%12/36 | BASE | 27.3% | 46 | 0 | 0 | 3/3 |
| OpenAI Codexopenai.com | 2.8%1/36 | -30.6 pp | 2.3% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1/3 |
12 prompts · 36 immutable answer hashes · empty cells mean no compared brand was detected.
| Public prompt | OpenAIopenai/gpt-4o-mini | Anthropicanthropic/claude-haiku-4-5 | Geminigoogle/gemini-2.5-flash |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01 What are the best AI coding agents for making reliable changes across a large existing codebase?recommendation | CursorGitHub CopilotClaude Code | CursorGitHub CopilotClaude Code | GitHub Copilot |
| 02 Recommend an AI-first code editor with fast autocomplete, multi-file editing, repository context, and model choice.recommendation | CursorGitHub Copilot | Cursor | CursorClaude Code |
| 03 Which coding agent is best for taking an issue, working in the background, running tests, and returning a reviewable pull request?recommendation | GitHub Copilot · C1 | Claude Code | GitHub Copilot · C1 |
| 04 Recommend a terminal-based coding agent that can inspect files, edit code, run commands, and ask for approval before risky actions.recommendation | GitHub Copilot · C1 | CursorGitHub CopilotClaude Code | Claude Code · C1 |
| 05 Which AI development tool is strongest for an enterprise that needs privacy controls, auditability, policy enforcement, and SSO?recommendation | No selected brand | No selected brand | No selected brand |
| 06 What developer tool should a team use to run multiple software engineering agents in parallel across isolated tasks?recommendation | CursorClaude Code | GitHub Copilot · C1 | No selected brand |
| 07 Recommend an AI developer platform for pull-request review, test generation, bug finding, and secure coding guidance.recommendation | GitHub Copilot | GitHub Copilot · C4 | No selected brand |
| 08 Which AI coding tool is best for understanding and modernizing a large legacy application with strong test coverage?recommendation | CursorGitHub Copilot | CursorGitHub CopilotClaude Code | No selected brand |
| 09 Compare AI developer tools on code quality, repository context, autonomy, latency, model choice, privacy, and integration depth.commercial | CursorGitHub CopilotClaude CodeOpenAI Codex | CursorGitHub Copilot · C1Claude Code | No selected brand |
| 10 How should a software team compare coding-agent pricing, usage limits, premium-model access, and total cost at scale?commercial | GitHub CopilotClaude Code | CursorGitHub CopilotClaude Code | Claude Code |
| 11 Create a proof-of-concept scorecard for evaluating AI coding tools on real repository tasks without relying on vendor claims.commercial | No selected brand | GitHub Copilot | No selected brand |
| 12 Which criteria reveal lock-in and portability risk when choosing an AI coding tool, including editor, model, data, and workflow control?commercial | No selected brand | No selected brand | No selected brand |
Hostnames are derived from validated public HTTP(S) URLs, not provider-supplied domain labels.
| Source hostname | Cited answers | Distinct URLs | Engine breadth | Best position | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| augmentcode.com | 14 | 11 | 3 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| reddit.com | 10 | 12 | 3 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| youtube.com | 9 | 9 | 3 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| linkedin.com | 8 | 8 | 2 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| github.com | 6 | 6 | 3 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| medium.com | 5 | 5 | 3 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| mindstudio.ai | 5 | 5 | 3 | #3 | Open source ↗ |
| developersdigest.tech | 4 | 4 | 3 | #3 | Open source ↗ |
| arxiv.org | 3 | 4 | 2 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| facebook.com | 3 | 3 | 1 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| ai.plainenglish.io | 3 | 2 | 1 | #2 | Open source ↗ |
| getdx.com | 3 | 2 | 3 | #2 | Open source ↗ |
| dust.tt | 2 | 3 | 2 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| blog.exceeds.ai | 2 | 2 | 2 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| dev.to | 2 | 2 | 2 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| gartner.com | 2 | 2 | 2 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| instagram.com | 2 | 2 | 1 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| sitepoint.com | 2 | 2 | 2 | #2 | Open source ↗ |
| departmentofproduct.substack.com | 2 | 1 | 2 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
| domo.com | 2 | 1 | 2 | #1 | Open source ↗ |
Derives prompt-level brand leaders and cross-engine brand-set disagreement from the complete public Rank.ai benchmark cohort.
Some explanation inputs are unavailable Missing: comparablePriorRanking.
| Component | Value | Weight | Contribution | Evidence | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| public prompt brand presence events | 4 | 0% | — | 1 | available |
| public prompt citation urls | 17 | 0% | — | 1 | available |
| public prompt distinct reviewed brands | 4 | 0% |
| — |
| 1 |
| available |
| public prompt engine disagreement | 100 | 100% | 100 | 1 | available |
|---|
| public prompt leading brand consensus | 33.333333 | 0% | — | 1 | available |
|---|
no_prior_published_snapshot
No comparable component drivers were published.
{"promptSlug":"parallel-software-engineering-agents","corpusVersion":"ai-developer-tools-2026-07-27","runArtifactIds":["792dd4e7-7cd9-4f9b-8747-edc42de48547","96469767-3687-4cde-bfc8-a3337dcf6b9d","861b9872-0cb6-4b76-bea1-a1e397bd1647"],"parentSnapshotId":"4c5e1752-7d4d-430f-8c0b-d5a634f070f5","providerMatrixVersion":"64232fd32583"}{"promptSlug":"parallel-software-engineering-agents","corpusVersion":"ai-developer-tools-2026-07-27","runArtifactIds":["792dd4e7-7cd9-4f9b-8747-edc42de48547","96469767-3687-4cde-bfc8-a3337dcf6b9d","861b9872-0cb6-4b76-bea1-a1e397bd1647"],"parentSnapshotId":"4c5e1752-7d4d-430f-8c0b-d5a634f070f5","providerMatrixVersion":"64232fd32583"}{"promptSlug":"parallel-software-engineering-agents","corpusVersion":"ai-developer-tools-2026-07-27","runArtifactIds":["792dd4e7-7cd9-4f9b-8747-edc42de48547","96469767-3687-4cde-bfc8-a3337dcf6b9d","861b9872-0cb6-4b76-bea1-a1e397bd1647"],"parentSnapshotId":"4c5e1752-7d4d-430f-8c0b-d5a634f070f5","providerMatrixVersion":"64232fd32583"}{"promptSlug":"parallel-software-engineering-agents","corpusVersion":"ai-developer-tools-2026-07-27","runArtifactIds":["792dd4e7-7cd9-4f9b-8747-edc42de48547","96469767-3687-4cde-bfc8-a3337dcf6b9d","861b9872-0cb6-4b76-bea1-a1e397bd1647"],"parentSnapshotId":"4c5e1752-7d4d-430f-8c0b-d5a634f070f5","providerMatrixVersion":"64232fd32583"}{"promptSlug":"parallel-software-engineering-agents","corpusVersion":"ai-developer-tools-2026-07-27","runArtifactIds":["792dd4e7-7cd9-4f9b-8747-edc42de48547","96469767-3687-4cde-bfc8-a3337dcf6b9d","861b9872-0cb6-4b76-bea1-a1e397bd1647"],"parentSnapshotId":"4c5e1752-7d4d-430f-8c0b-d5a634f070f5","providerMatrixVersion":"64232fd32583"}