Category intelligence / ecosystem
AI meeting assistants
Transcription, meeting memory, actions, workflows, and conversation-intelligence products ranked across a fixed buying corpus.
Evidence catalog
Open category terminal →Live Meeting AI tables
| Table | Coverage | Confidence | Freshness | Cadence | Updated | Open |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI meeting assistants rankReviewed AI meeting assistants ranked by recommendation-prompt presence across three configured model APIs. | 12 | 100% | current | daily | Jul 27, 2026 | View table → |
| AI meeting assistants presenceReviewed vendors ranked by presence across every answer in the complete category cohort. | 12 | 100% | current | daily | Jul 27, 2026 | View table → |
| AI meeting assistants citation shareReviewed vendors ranked by distinct answer-level citations to their canonical domains. | 12 | 100% | current | daily | Jul 27, 2026 | View table → |
| AI meeting assistants engine breadthReviewed vendors ranked by the number of configured model APIs on which they appear. | 12 | 100% | current | daily | Jul 27, 2026 | View table → |
| AI meeting assistants in OpenAI model API answersVendor presence in the fixed OpenAI configured-model API cohort; not the ChatGPT consumer application. | 12 | 100% | current | daily | Jul 27, 2026 | View table → |
| AI meeting assistants in Anthropic model API answersVendor presence in the fixed Anthropic configured-model API cohort; not the Claude consumer application. | 12 | 100% | current | daily | Jul 27, 2026 | View table → |
| AI meeting assistants in Gemini model API answersVendor presence in the fixed Gemini configured-model API cohort; not the Gemini consumer application. | 12 | 100% | current | daily | Jul 27, 2026 | View table → |
| AI meeting assistants buying-prompt leadersThe leading reviewed vendor for every neutral buying prompt, with exact cross-engine consensus. | 16 | 100% | current | daily | Jul 27, 2026 | View table → |
| AI meeting assistants engine disagreementBuying prompts ranked by how differently the configured engines surface the reviewed vendor universe. | 16 | 100% | current | daily | Jul 27, 2026 | View table → |
| AI meeting assistants prompt citation opportunitiesBuying prompts where the leading reviewed vendor appears across engines but its own domains are not cited. | 16 | 100% | current | daily | Jul 27, 2026 | View table → |
| Most-cited domains for meeting ai buying promptsURL-derived citation hostnames ranked by complete-cohort cited-answer coverage, breadth, and position. | 117 | 100% | current | daily | Jul 27, 2026 | View table → |
Latest
Open full board →Current category leaders
| Rank | Entity | Published value | Movement | Confidence | Signal | Profile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Read AIcompany | 58.3% | — | 100% | — | Evidence → |
| 02 | Otter.aicompany | 41.7% | — | 100% | — | Evidence → |
| 03 | Fathomcompany | 41.7% | — | 100% | — | Evidence → |
| 04 | Fellowcompany | 33.3% | — | 100% | — | Evidence → |
| 05 | Krispcompany | 33.3% | — | 100% | — | Evidence → |
| 06 | Avomacompany | 29.2% | — | 100% | — | Evidence → |
| 07 | Fireflies.aicompany | 20.8% | — | 100% | — | Evidence → |
| 08 | tl;dvcompany | 16.7% | — | 100% | — | Evidence → |
| 09 | Zoom AI Companioncompany | 4.2% | — | 100% | — | Evidence → |
| 10 | Graincompany | 4.2% | — | 100% | — | Evidence → |
| 11 | Sembly AIcompany | 4.2% | — | 100% | — | Evidence → |
| 12 | Supernormalcompany | 0.0% | — | 100% | — | Evidence → |
Corpus ai-meeting-assistants-2026-07-27 / 3 providers
Test your own prompt →Questions shaping this market
| Buyer prompt | Intent | Current leader | Answers | Providers | Citations | Owned citations | Challenge |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Which AI meeting assistants are best for accurate transcription, useful summaries, decisions, action items, and searchable meeting memory? | recommendation | Otter.ai · 5 | 3 | 3 | 20 | 6 | Run live → |
| Recommend an AI meeting assistant for a global enterprise that needs administration, retention controls, security, compliance, and data residency. | recommendation | Fellow · 7 | 3 | 3 | 20 | 1 | Run live → |
| Which AI meeting assistants are strongest for sales calls, coaching, CRM updates, follow-up drafts, deal signals, and account handoffs? | recommendation | Avoma · 6 | 3 | 3 | 23 | 3 | Run live → |
| Recommend an AI meeting assistant for product and engineering teams that need decisions, technical context, tasks, and project-tool integrations. | recommendation | Fellow · 3 | 3 | 3 | 20 | 5 | Run live → |
| Which AI meeting assistants are best for multilingual teams that need high transcription accuracy, speaker identification, translation, and summaries? | recommendation | Fireflies.ai · 4 | 3 | 3 | 21 | 4 | Run live → |
| Recommend an AI meeting assistant that can capture calls and in-person conversations with clear consent controls and flexible recording modes. | recommendation | Otter.ai · 5 | 3 | 3 | 22 | 3 | Run live → |
| Which AI meeting assistants provide the strongest cited search across past conversations, decisions, topics, people, projects, and follow-up work? | recommendation | Avoma · 6 | 3 | 3 | 20 | 7 | Run live → |
| Recommend an affordable AI meeting assistant for a small team that needs fast setup, reliable notes, shared templates, and transparent limits. | recommendation | Fathom · 8 | 3 | 3 | 21 | 4 | Run live → |
| Compare AI meeting assistants on transcription, summaries, search, actions, integrations, analytics, administration, privacy, and support. | commercial | Fireflies.ai · 19 | 3 | 3 | 24 | 4 | Run live → |
| Create a reproducible evaluation for AI meeting assistants covering word accuracy, speakers, jargon, decisions, action items, and hallucinations. | commercial | — | 3 | 3 | 5 | 0 | Run live → |
| Compare AI meeting assistants on consent, recording disclosure, encryption, retention, model training, deletion, audit logs, access, and data residency. | commercial | Otter.ai · 11 | 3 | 3 | 24 | 3 | Run live → |
| Compare AI meeting assistants on calendar, conferencing, messaging, CRM, project management, document, automation, API, and webhook integrations. | commercial | Fellow · 18 | 3 | 3 | 19 | 5 | Run live → |
| How should a buyer compare AI meeting assistant pricing across seats, recording hours, storage, uploads, intelligence features, and enterprise controls? | commercial | Fellow · 1 | 3 | 3 | 25 | 5 | Run live → |
| Design a proof-of-concept scorecard for AI meeting assistants using real calls, difficult audio, domain vocabulary, workflows, and user adoption. | commercial | — | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | Run live → |
| Which criteria expose transcript, recording, summary, workspace, integration, export, API, and retention lock-in in an AI meeting assistant? | commercial | Fellow · 2 | 3 | 3 | 15 | 2 | Run live → |
| Create a shortlist of AI meeting assistant vendors for a regulated company replacing manual notes across customer and internal meetings. | commercial | Krisp · 3 | 3 | 3 | 22 | 3 | Run live → |
Use the public category as your baseline
Analyze this category →Browse every live table →