RANK.AI DATA / Latest

Most-cited domains in AI Meeting Assistants answers

Domains ranked by unique cited-answer coverage across Rank.ai's complete public prompt benchmark. This measures sourcing visibility—not recommendation or authority.

Coverage: 117 entities
Confidence: 100%
Freshness: current
Export: CSV / JSON

PUBLIC VIEW / NO LOGINTrack this exact boardFilters and comparisons stay in the URL. Bookmark it, share it, or follow verified snapshot changes.

Follow changes

Watching publication Jul 27, 2026

LEADERBOARD

Current rankings

Metric: Cited-answer coverage

Find in tableEntity typeMovementConfidenceEvidence NRank rangeColumnsSort rows

117of 117 rows

Most-cited domains in AI Meeting Assistants answers current rankings
Rank	Entity	Cited-answer coverage	Public Prompt Source Best Position	Public Prompt Source Cited Answer Count	Public Prompt Source Distinct Url Count	Public Prompt Source Engine Breadth	Public Prompt Source Mean Position	Public Prompt Source Median Position	Confidence	N	Change	Trend	Explain
01	zapier.comsource	50.0%	1	24	4	3	3.9	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
02	read.aisource	50.0%	1	24	7	3	4.2	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
03	reddit.comsource	33.3%	1	16	12	3	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
04	youtube.comsource	31.3%	1	15	9	3	3.9	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
05	hinoter.comsource	18.8%	1	9	3	3	3.9	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
06	fellow.aisource	18.8%	1	9	8	3	4.1	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
07	meetingnotes.comsource	12.5%	1	6	4	3	5.2	5.5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
08	tldv.iosource	12.5%	1	6	3	3	5	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
09	faegredrinker.comsource	12.5%	2	6	1	2	4.7	4.5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
10	linkedin.comsource	10.4%	2	5	4	3	4.8	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
11	peoplemanagingpeople.comsource	10.4%	2	5	1	2	4.4	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
12	zackproser.comsource	10.4%	1	5	3	2	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
13	krisp.aisource	10.4%	1	5	3	2	5	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
14	ticnote.comsource	8.3%	1	4	4	3	3.5	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
15	avoma.comsource	8.3%	1	4	6	3	3.9	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
16	happyscribe.comsource	8.3%	1	4	4	3	4.5	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
17	cirrusinsight.comsource	8.3%	2	4	1	3	4	4.5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
18	huit.harvard.edusource	8.3%	1	4	1	2	5.8	7	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
19	rivaengine.comsource	6.3%	2	3	3	3	3.3	2.5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
20	otter.aisource	6.3%	1	3	2	3	3.7	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
21	meetily.aisource	6.3%	1	3	3	2	1.7	1	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
22	mixmax.comsource	6.3%	1	3	3	2	3.3	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
23	slack.comsource	6.3%	2	3	2	2	3.3	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
24	pub.towardsai.netsource	6.3%	1	3	1	2	3.3	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
25	nylas.comsource	6.3%	1	3	1	2	3.7	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
26	perfectwikiforteams.comsource	6.3%	2	3	1	2	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
27	glean.comsource	4.2%	2	2	2	2	2	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
28	autointerviewai.comsource	4.2%	2	2	1	2	2.5	2.5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
29	circleback.aisource	4.2%	1	2	2	2	2.3	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
30	privacy.blog.fordham.edusource	4.2%	3	2	1	2	3.5	3.5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
31	zoom.comsource	4.2%	3	2	2	2	3.5	3.5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
32	instagram.comsource	4.2%	1	2	2	2	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
33	useparagon.comsource	4.2%	3	2	2	2	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
34	reedsmith.comsource	4.2%	1	2	1	2	4.5	4.5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
35	vibe.ussource	4.2%	5	2	2	2	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
36	microsoft.comsource	4.2%	5	2	2	2	5.5	5.5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
37	simular.aisource	4.2%	1	2	1	1	1.5	1.5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
38	tactiq.iosource	4.2%	3	2	1	1	3	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
39	docsie.iosource	4.2%	2	2	2	1	3.5	3.5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
40	hedy.aisource	4.2%	4	2	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
41	askelephant.aisource	4.2%	3	2	1	1	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
42	aibuzz.blogsource	2.1%	1	1	1	1	1	1	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
43	babstcalland.comsource	2.1%	1	1	1	1	1	1	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
44	cohere.comsource	2.1%	1	1	1	1	1	1	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
45	fathom.aisource	2.1%	1	1	1	1	1	1	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
46	llamaindex.aisource	2.1%	1	1	1	1	1	1	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
47	monday.comsource	2.1%	1	1	1	1	1	1	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
48	revenue.iosource	2.1%	1	1	1	1	1	1	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
49	support.rivasync.comsource	2.1%	1	1	1	1	1	1	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
50	clari.comsource	2.1%	2	1	1	1	2	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
51	conifers.aisource	2.1%	2	1	1	1	2	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
52	docket.iosource	2.1%	2	1	1	1	2	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
53	law.comsource	2.1%	2	1	1	1	2	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
54	maestra.aisource	2.1%	2	1	1	1	2	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
55	notion.comsource	2.1%	2	1	1	1	2	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
56	owll.aisource	2.1%	1	1	3	1	3.3	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
57	arxiv.orgsource	2.1%	3	1	1	1	3	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
58	dialpad.comsource	2.1%	3	1	1	1	3	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
59	fireflies.aisource	2.1%	3	1	1	1	3	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
60	forasoft.comsource	2.1%	3	1	1	1	3	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
61	hrexecutive.comsource	2.1%	3	1	1	1	3	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
62	joinleland.comsource	2.1%	3	1	1	1	3	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
63	noota.iosource	2.1%	3	1	1	1	3	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
64	support.monday.comsource	2.1%	3	1	1	1	3	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
65	webex.comsource	2.1%	3	1	1	1	3	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
66	aspr.aisource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
67	augmentcode.comsource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
68	brasstranscripts.comsource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
69	charitydigital.org.uksource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
70	chromewebstore.google.comsource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
71	laxis.comsource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
72	nimitai.comsource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
73	npr.orgsource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
74	pipedrive.comsource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
75	progressiverobot.comsource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
76	sea.plaud.aisource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
77	slds-lmu.github.iosource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
78	solverglobal.comsource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
79	summaryai.appsource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
80	asana.comsource	2.1%	5	1	1	1	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
81	assemblyai.comsource	2.1%	5	1	1	1	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
82	finance.yahoo.comsource	2.1%	5	1	1	1	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
83	jacksonlewis.comsource	2.1%	5	1	1	1	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
84	knowledge.workspace.google.comsource	2.1%	5	1	1	1	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
85	learn.microsoft.comsource	2.1%	5	1	1	1	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
86	onboardmeetings.comsource	2.1%	5	1	1	1	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
87	reclaim.aisource	2.1%	5	1	1	1	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
88	ruder.iosource	2.1%	5	1	1	1	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
89	tana.incsource	2.1%	5	1	1	1	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
90	whitecase.comsource	2.1%	5	1	1	1	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
91	apps.apple.comsource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
92	drata.comsource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
93	facebook.comsource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
94	fisherphillips.comsource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
95	help.fathom.videosource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
96	kb.wisc.edusource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
97	klu.sosource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
98	layer3labs.iosource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
99	meetjamie.aisource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
100	notta.aisource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
101	pipeline.zoominfo.comsource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
102	softwareseni.comsource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
103	granola.aisource	2.1%	7	1	1	1	7	7	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
104	speclens.aisource	2.1%	7	1	1	1	7	7	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
105	support.read.aisource	2.1%	7	1	1	1	7	7	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
106	technologylaw.fkks.comsource	2.1%	7	1	1	1	7	7	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
107	trycomp.aisource	2.1%	7	1	1	1	7	7	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
108	bluedothq.comsource	2.1%	8	1	1	1	8	8	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
109	demodesk.comsource	2.1%	8	1	1	1	8	8	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
110	g2.comsource	2.1%	8	1	1	1	8	8	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
111	gmicloud.aisource	2.1%	8	1	1	1	8	8	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
112	modernrequirements.comsource	2.1%	8	1	1	1	8	8	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
113	scalecomputing.comsource	2.1%	8	1	1	1	8	8	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
114	aloware.comsource	2.1%	9	1	1	1	9	9	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
115	myshyft.comsource	2.1%	9	1	1	1	9	9	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
116	salesforce.comsource	2.1%	9	1	1	1	9	9	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
117	scrut.iosource	2.1%	9	1	1	1	9	9	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank

Most-cited domains in AI Meeting Assistants answers current rankings
Rank	Entity	Cited-answer coverage	Public Prompt Source Best Position	Public Prompt Source Cited Answer Count	Public Prompt Source Distinct Url Count	Public Prompt Source Engine Breadth	Public Prompt Source Mean Position	Public Prompt Source Median Position	Confidence	N	Change	Trend	Explain
01	zapier.comsource	50.0%	1	24	4	3	3.9	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
02	read.aisource	50.0%	1	24	7	3	4.2	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
03	reddit.comsource	33.3%	1	16	12	3	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
04	youtube.comsource	31.3%	1	15	9	3	3.9	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
05	hinoter.comsource	18.8%	1	9	3	3	3.9	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
06	fellow.aisource	18.8%	1	9	8	3	4.1	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
07	meetingnotes.comsource	12.5%	1	6	4	3	5.2	5.5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
08	tldv.iosource	12.5%	1	6	3	3	5	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
09	faegredrinker.comsource	12.5%	2	6	1	2	4.7	4.5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
10	linkedin.comsource	10.4%	2	5	4	3	4.8	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
11	peoplemanagingpeople.comsource	10.4%	2	5	1	2	4.4	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
12	zackproser.comsource	10.4%	1	5	3	2	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
13	krisp.aisource	10.4%	1	5	3	2	5	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
14	ticnote.comsource	8.3%	1	4	4	3	3.5	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
15	avoma.comsource	8.3%	1	4	6	3	3.9	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
16	happyscribe.comsource	8.3%	1	4	4	3	4.5	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
17	cirrusinsight.comsource	8.3%	2	4	1	3	4	4.5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
18	huit.harvard.edusource	8.3%	1	4	1	2	5.8	7	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
19	rivaengine.comsource	6.3%	2	3	3	3	3.3	2.5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
20	otter.aisource	6.3%	1	3	2	3	3.7	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
21	meetily.aisource	6.3%	1	3	3	2	1.7	1	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
22	mixmax.comsource	6.3%	1	3	3	2	3.3	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
23	slack.comsource	6.3%	2	3	2	2	3.3	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
24	pub.towardsai.netsource	6.3%	1	3	1	2	3.3	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
25	nylas.comsource	6.3%	1	3	1	2	3.7	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
26	perfectwikiforteams.comsource	6.3%	2	3	1	2	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
27	glean.comsource	4.2%	2	2	2	2	2	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
28	autointerviewai.comsource	4.2%	2	2	1	2	2.5	2.5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
29	circleback.aisource	4.2%	1	2	2	2	2.3	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
30	privacy.blog.fordham.edusource	4.2%	3	2	1	2	3.5	3.5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
31	zoom.comsource	4.2%	3	2	2	2	3.5	3.5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
32	instagram.comsource	4.2%	1	2	2	2	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
33	useparagon.comsource	4.2%	3	2	2	2	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
34	reedsmith.comsource	4.2%	1	2	1	2	4.5	4.5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
35	vibe.ussource	4.2%	5	2	2	2	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
36	microsoft.comsource	4.2%	5	2	2	2	5.5	5.5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
37	simular.aisource	4.2%	1	2	1	1	1.5	1.5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
38	tactiq.iosource	4.2%	3	2	1	1	3	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
39	docsie.iosource	4.2%	2	2	2	1	3.5	3.5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
40	hedy.aisource	4.2%	4	2	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
41	askelephant.aisource	4.2%	3	2	1	1	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
42	aibuzz.blogsource	2.1%	1	1	1	1	1	1	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
43	babstcalland.comsource	2.1%	1	1	1	1	1	1	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
44	cohere.comsource	2.1%	1	1	1	1	1	1	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
45	fathom.aisource	2.1%	1	1	1	1	1	1	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
46	llamaindex.aisource	2.1%	1	1	1	1	1	1	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
47	monday.comsource	2.1%	1	1	1	1	1	1	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
48	revenue.iosource	2.1%	1	1	1	1	1	1	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
49	support.rivasync.comsource	2.1%	1	1	1	1	1	1	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
50	clari.comsource	2.1%	2	1	1	1	2	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
51	conifers.aisource	2.1%	2	1	1	1	2	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
52	docket.iosource	2.1%	2	1	1	1	2	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
53	law.comsource	2.1%	2	1	1	1	2	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
54	maestra.aisource	2.1%	2	1	1	1	2	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
55	notion.comsource	2.1%	2	1	1	1	2	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
56	owll.aisource	2.1%	1	1	3	1	3.3	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
57	arxiv.orgsource	2.1%	3	1	1	1	3	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
58	dialpad.comsource	2.1%	3	1	1	1	3	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
59	fireflies.aisource	2.1%	3	1	1	1	3	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
60	forasoft.comsource	2.1%	3	1	1	1	3	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
61	hrexecutive.comsource	2.1%	3	1	1	1	3	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
62	joinleland.comsource	2.1%	3	1	1	1	3	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
63	noota.iosource	2.1%	3	1	1	1	3	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
64	support.monday.comsource	2.1%	3	1	1	1	3	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
65	webex.comsource	2.1%	3	1	1	1	3	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
66	aspr.aisource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
67	augmentcode.comsource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
68	brasstranscripts.comsource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
69	charitydigital.org.uksource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
70	chromewebstore.google.comsource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
71	laxis.comsource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
72	nimitai.comsource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
73	npr.orgsource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
74	pipedrive.comsource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
75	progressiverobot.comsource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
76	sea.plaud.aisource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
77	slds-lmu.github.iosource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
78	solverglobal.comsource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
79	summaryai.appsource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
80	asana.comsource	2.1%	5	1	1	1	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
81	assemblyai.comsource	2.1%	5	1	1	1	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
82	finance.yahoo.comsource	2.1%	5	1	1	1	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
83	jacksonlewis.comsource	2.1%	5	1	1	1	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
84	knowledge.workspace.google.comsource	2.1%	5	1	1	1	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
85	learn.microsoft.comsource	2.1%	5	1	1	1	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
86	onboardmeetings.comsource	2.1%	5	1	1	1	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
87	reclaim.aisource	2.1%	5	1	1	1	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
88	ruder.iosource	2.1%	5	1	1	1	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
89	tana.incsource	2.1%	5	1	1	1	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
90	whitecase.comsource	2.1%	5	1	1	1	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
91	apps.apple.comsource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
92	drata.comsource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
93	facebook.comsource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
94	fisherphillips.comsource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
95	help.fathom.videosource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
96	kb.wisc.edusource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
97	klu.sosource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
98	layer3labs.iosource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
99	meetjamie.aisource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
100	notta.aisource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
101	pipeline.zoominfo.comsource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
102	softwareseni.comsource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
103	granola.aisource	2.1%	7	1	1	1	7	7	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
104	speclens.aisource	2.1%	7	1	1	1	7	7	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
105	support.read.aisource	2.1%	7	1	1	1	7	7	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
106	technologylaw.fkks.comsource	2.1%	7	1	1	1	7	7	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
107	trycomp.aisource	2.1%	7	1	1	1	7	7	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
108	bluedothq.comsource	2.1%	8	1	1	1	8	8	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
109	demodesk.comsource	2.1%	8	1	1	1	8	8	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
110	g2.comsource	2.1%	8	1	1	1	8	8	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
111	gmicloud.aisource	2.1%	8	1	1	1	8	8	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
112	modernrequirements.comsource	2.1%	8	1	1	1	8	8	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
113	scalecomputing.comsource	2.1%	8	1	1	1	8	8	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
114	aloware.comsource	2.1%	9	1	1	1	9	9	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
115	myshyft.comsource	2.1%	9	1	1	1	9	9	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
116	salesforce.comsource	2.1%	9	1	1	1	9	9	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
117	scrut.iosource	2.1%	9	1	1	1	9	9	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank

Primary brandPrompt intentAnswer enginePrompt contains

Run live test

Answer presence35.4%17/48 filtered answers mention or cite Otter.ai

Selected-set share30.9%Share of answer-presences among the compared brands, not market share

Owned citation answers33 answer-level URL signals on reviewed owned domains

Engine breadth3/3Engines with at least one observed presence

Filtered competitive answer-presence comparison
Brand	Presence	Vs. primary	Selected share	Mentions	Cited answers	Owned URL signals	Engine breadth
Otter.aiotter.ai	35.4%17/48	BASE	30.9%	51	3	3	3/3
Fathomfathom.video	33.3%16/48	-2.1 pp	29.1%	61	1	1	3/3
Fireflies.aifireflies.ai	25.0%12/48	-10.4 pp	21.8%	39	1	1	3/3
Avomaavoma.com	20.8%10/48	-14.6 pp	18.2%	19	4	7	3/3

ANSWER-LEVEL OBSERVATIONS

Prompt × engine matrix

16 prompts · 48 immutable answer hashes · empty cells mean no compared brand was detected.

Brand presence by public prompt and answer engine
Public prompt	OpenAIopenai/gpt-4o-mini	Anthropicanthropic/claude-haiku-4-5	Geminigoogle/gemini-2.5-flash
01 Which AI meeting assistants are best for accurate transcription, useful summaries, decisions, action items, and searchable meeting memory?recommendation	Otter.aiFireflies.aiFathom 8 source URLs`3d2058f0`	Otter.ai · C1Fathom 7 source URLs`66a51ca2`	FathomAvoma 5 source URLs`6dd06e22`
02 Recommend an AI meeting assistant for a global enterprise that needs administration, retention controls, security, compliance, and data residency.recommendation	Avoma 6 source URLs`7a8dc7cc`	No selected brand 6 source URLs`4c6cfdb4`	No selected brand 8 source URLs`97a9af58`
03 Which AI meeting assistants are strongest for sales calls, coaching, CRM updates, follow-up drafts, deal signals, and account handoffs?recommendation	Avoma 8 source URLs`23b44d70`	FathomAvoma 6 source URLs`4d922f80`	No selected brand 9 source URLs`e82874c3`
04 Recommend an AI meeting assistant for product and engineering teams that need decisions, technical context, tasks, and project-tool integrations.recommendation	FathomAvoma 6 source URLs`43ff0010`	No selected brand 6 source URLs`36c01e81`	No selected brand 8 source URLs`931bf977`
05 Which AI meeting assistants are best for multilingual teams that need high transcription accuracy, speaker identification, translation, and summaries?recommendation	Otter.ai · C1Fireflies.ai 7 source URLs`bacbcadf`	Otter.aiFireflies.ai 8 source URLs`e4a0b21d`	Avoma · C1 6 source URLs`ddb68832`
06 Recommend an AI meeting assistant that can capture calls and in-person conversations with clear consent controls and flexible recording modes.recommendation	Otter.ai 5 source URLs`46a049db`	Otter.aiFireflies.ai 8 source URLs`c71d8028`	Otter.ai · C1 9 source URLs`6b9c47eb`
07 Which AI meeting assistants provide the strongest cited search across past conversations, decisions, topics, people, projects, and follow-up work?recommendation	Otter.aiFathom 6 source URLs`c84d442b`	Otter.aiFireflies.ai · C1Avoma · C4 7 source URLs`846520f7`	Fathom 7 source URLs`ac4f309d`
08 Recommend an affordable AI meeting assistant for a small team that needs fast setup, reliable notes, shared templates, and transparent limits.recommendation	Fathom 8 source URLs`afef9f66`	Fathom · C1 6 source URLs`e1844d8b`	Otter.aiFathom 7 source URLs`73fb2ffb`
09 Compare AI meeting assistants on transcription, summaries, search, actions, integrations, analytics, administration, privacy, and support.commercial	Otter.aiFathom 6 source URLs`bd98ea36`	Otter.aiFireflies.aiFathom 9 source URLs`6ee502bb`	No selected brand 9 source URLs`012b11b8`
10 Create a reproducible evaluation for AI meeting assistants covering word accuracy, speakers, jargon, decisions, action items, and hallucinations.commercial	No selected brand 0 source URLs`6b21df6f`	No selected brand 5 source URLs`0ac413bb`	No selected brand 0 source URLs`599a089b`
11 Compare AI meeting assistants on consent, recording disclosure, encryption, retention, model training, deletion, audit logs, access, and data residency.commercial	Avoma · C1 8 source URLs`cce5a130`	Otter.aiFireflies.aiFathom 8 source URLs`d36156b2`	Avoma · C1 8 source URLs`49a181cb`
12 Compare AI meeting assistants on calendar, conferencing, messaging, CRM, project management, document, automation, API, and webhook integrations.commercial	Otter.aiFireflies.ai 6 source URLs`5e5b114b`	Fireflies.aiFathom 8 source URLs`de93a0f5`	Otter.aiFireflies.ai 5 source URLs`4ddb412a`
13 How should a buyer compare AI meeting assistant pricing across seats, recording hours, storage, uploads, intelligence features, and enterprise controls?commercial	No selected brand 9 source URLs`1a47824b`	No selected brand 9 source URLs`f0c68d55`	No selected brand 7 source URLs`a90b3c68`
14 Design a proof-of-concept scorecard for AI meeting assistants using real calls, difficult audio, domain vocabulary, workflows, and user adoption.commercial	No selected brand 0 source URLs`0c176c4d`	No selected brand 0 source URLs`e89273d8`	No selected brand 0 source URLs`df86e030`
15 Which criteria expose transcript, recording, summary, workspace, integration, export, API, and retention lock-in in an AI meeting assistant?commercial	No selected brand 9 source URLs`947e1ca4`	No selected brand 0 source URLs`1574b3f1`	No selected brand 6 source URLs`282df15c`
16 Create a shortlist of AI meeting assistant vendors for a regulated company replacing manual notes across customer and internal meetings.commercial	Otter.ai 6 source URLs`6ccdaba0`	Otter.aiFireflies.aiFathomAvoma 9 source URLs`0e7228da`	Fireflies.aiFathom 7 source URLs`19f8bd3c`

STRUCTURED CITATION LEDGER

Sources shaping this filtered view

Hostnames are derived from validated public HTTP(S) URLs, not provider-supplied domain labels.

Validated citation sources in filtered answers
Source hostname	Cited answers	Distinct URLs	Engine breadth	Best position	Evidence
read.ai	24	7	3	#1	Open source ↗
zapier.com	24	4	3	#1	Open source ↗
reddit.com	16	12	3	#1	Open source ↗
youtube.com	15	9	3	#1	Open source ↗
fellow.ai	9	8	3	#1	Open source ↗
hinoter.com	9	3	3	#1	Open source ↗
meetingnotes.com	6	4	3	#1	Open source ↗
tldv.io	6	3	3	#1	Open source ↗
faegredrinker.com	6	1	2	#2	Open source ↗
linkedin.com	5	4	3	#2	Open source ↗
krisp.ai	5	3	2	#1	Open source ↗
zackproser.com	5	3	2	#1	Open source ↗
peoplemanagingpeople.com	5	1	2	#2	Open source ↗
avoma.com	4	6	3	#1	Open source ↗
happyscribe.com	4	4	3	#1	Open source ↗
ticnote.com	4	4	3	#1	Open source ↗
huit.harvard.edu	4	1	2	#1	Open source ↗
cirrusinsight.com	4	1	3	#2	Open source ↗
meetily.ai	3	3	2	#1	Open source ↗
mixmax.com	3	3	2	#1	Open source ↗

PUBLIC-BENCHMARK PRIVACY BOUNDARY

This report contains only code-reviewed public prompts, deterministic brand counts, answer hashes, and validated structured citation URLs. Full model answers are neither stored nor published here. No customer, organization, or private tracked-prompt data is included.

ai-meeting-assistants-2026-07-27 / 4-ai-meeting-assistants-2026-07-27-models-64232fd32583

Most-cited domains in AI Meeting Assistants answers

Current rankings

Brand vs. market

Prompt × engine matrix

Sources shaping this filtered view

Brand vs. market

Prompt × engine matrix

Sources shaping this filtered view