BUYER PROMPT / PUBLISHED EVIDENCE
Which legal AI platforms are strongest for a law firm that needs matter controls, knowledge integration, auditability, adoption, and support?
An exact prompt-level view of which reviewed brands surfaced and which public URLs the configured AI models cited. No answer text or tenant data is published.
- Intent
- recommendation
- Model providers
- 3
- Categories
- 1
- Last observed
- Jul 27, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC
COMPETITIVE OUTCOME
Brands surfaced
Ordered by provider breadth, then total mentions and owned-domain citations. A mention is not an endorsement or a position claim.
| # | Brand | Category | Providers | Mentions | Owned citations | Provider evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Harveyharvey.ai ↗ | Legal AI | 2 | 8 | 1 | Anthropic · Gemini |
| 02 | CoCounselthomsonreuters.com ↗ | Legal AI | 2 | 6 | 1 | Openai · Anthropic |
| 03 | Lexis+ AIlexisnexis.com ↗ | Legal AI | 2 | 4 | 0 | Openai · Anthropic |
| 04 | Clio Duoclio.com ↗ | Legal AI | 2 | 0 | 2 | Openai · Gemini |
| 05 | Ironclad AIironcladapp.com ↗ | Legal AI | 1 | 0 | 1 | Openai |
| 06 | Paxton AIpaxton.ai ↗ | Legal AI | 1 | 0 | 1 | Gemini |
MODEL COMPARISON
Answer matrix
One row per configured provider and category snapshot. Hashes prove answer identity without publishing stored answer text.
| Provider | Model version | Category | Brands surfaced | Citations | Unique domains | Answer hash |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Openai | openai/gpt-4o-mini | Legal AI | CoCounsel · Lexis+ AI · Clio Duo · Ironclad AI | 7 | 7 | 1241f7c9…73dc8 |
| Anthropic | anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5 | Legal AI | Harvey · CoCounsel · Lexis+ AI | 9 | 9 | 1de42f7d…10362 |
| Gemini | google/gemini-2.5-flash | Legal AI | Harvey · Clio Duo · Paxton AI | 8 | 8 | ab29c90e…4c1b0 |
URL-DERIVED CITATIONS
Sources cited
Hostnames are derived from the returned public URLs. Best position is the smallest citation position observed.