Rank.ai
Menu
Live
BUYER PROMPT / PUBLISHED EVIDENCE

Design a contract-review benchmark for legal AI using known clauses, missing terms, conflicts, defined terms, playbooks, redlines, and explanations.

An exact prompt-level view of which reviewed brands surfaced and which public URLs the configured AI models cited. No answer text or tenant data is published.

Intent
commercial
Model providers
3
Categories
1
Last observed
Jul 27, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC
COMPETITIVE OUTCOME

Brands surfaced

Ordered by provider breadth, then total mentions and owned-domain citations. A mention is not an endorsement or a position claim.

#BrandCategoryProvidersMentionsOwned citationsProvider evidence
01Harveyharvey.aiLegal AI101Gemini
MODEL COMPARISON

Answer matrix

One row per configured provider and category snapshot. Hashes prove answer identity without publishing stored answer text.

ProviderModel versionCategoryBrands surfacedCitationsUnique domainsAnswer hash
Openaiopenai/gpt-4o-miniLegal AINone observed0074df96be…2101c
Anthropicanthropic/claude-haiku-4-5Legal AINone observed66f7ae3fad…caf5d
Geminigoogle/gemini-2.5-flashLegal AIHarvey22f1e257ff…56202
URL-DERIVED CITATIONS

Sources cited

Hostnames are derived from the returned public URLs. Best position is the smallest citation position observed.

Snapshot IDs7469f302-796d-4ba4-a3b9-5005160c89bb
Corpus versionslegal-ai-platforms-2026-07-27
Benchmark versions4-legal-ai-platforms-2026-07-27-models-64232fd32583

Coverage: Legal AI. Full answers stored: no · Full answers published: no · Tenant data included: no.