Rank.ai
Menu
Live
BUYER PROMPT / PUBLISHED EVIDENCE

Create a proof-of-concept scorecard for evaluating AI coding tools on real repository tasks without relying on vendor claims.

An exact prompt-level view of which reviewed brands surfaced and which public URLs the configured AI models cited. No answer text or tenant data is published.

Intent
commercial
Model providers
3
Categories
1
Last observed
Jul 27, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC
COMPETITIVE OUTCOME

Brands surfaced

Ordered by provider breadth, then total mentions and owned-domain citations. A mention is not an endorsement or a position claim.

#BrandCategoryProvidersMentionsOwned citationsProvider evidence
01GitHub Copilotgithub.comAI developer tools110Anthropic
MODEL COMPARISON

Answer matrix

One row per configured provider and category snapshot. Hashes prove answer identity without publishing stored answer text.

ProviderModel versionCategoryBrands surfacedCitationsUnique domainsAnswer hash
Openaiopenai/gpt-4o-miniAI developer toolsNone observed00cffc6301…90b49
Anthropicanthropic/claude-haiku-4-5AI developer toolsGitHub Copilot548084f134…d0ebf
Geminigoogle/gemini-2.5-flashAI developer toolsNone observed00c2c55858…a9c19
URL-DERIVED CITATIONS

Sources cited

Hostnames are derived from the returned public URLs. Best position is the smallest citation position observed.

Snapshot IDs4c5e1752-7d4d-430f-8c0b-d5a634f070f5
Corpus versionsai-developer-tools-2026-07-27
Benchmark versions4-ai-developer-tools-2026-07-27-models-64232fd32583

Coverage: AI developer tools. Full answers stored: no · Full answers published: no · Tenant data included: no.