Category intelligence / ecosystem
Legal AI
Legal research, drafting, contract, litigation, and knowledge products ranked across a fixed buying corpus.
Evidence catalog
Open category terminal →Live Legal AI tables
| Table | Coverage | Confidence | Freshness | Cadence | Updated | Open |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Legal AI rankReviewed legal AI platforms ranked by recommendation-prompt presence across three configured model APIs. | 12 | 100% | current | daily | Jul 27, 2026 | View table → |
| Legal AI presenceReviewed vendors ranked by presence across every answer in the complete category cohort. | 12 | 100% | current | daily | Jul 27, 2026 | View table → |
| Legal AI citation shareReviewed vendors ranked by distinct answer-level citations to their canonical domains. | 12 | 100% | current | daily | Jul 27, 2026 | View table → |
| Legal AI engine breadthReviewed vendors ranked by the number of configured model APIs on which they appear. | 12 | 100% | current | daily | Jul 27, 2026 | View table → |
| Legal AI in OpenAI model API answersVendor presence in the fixed OpenAI configured-model API cohort; not the ChatGPT consumer application. | 12 | 100% | current | daily | Jul 27, 2026 | View table → |
| Legal AI in Anthropic model API answersVendor presence in the fixed Anthropic configured-model API cohort; not the Claude consumer application. | 12 | 100% | current | daily | Jul 27, 2026 | View table → |
| Legal AI in Gemini model API answersVendor presence in the fixed Gemini configured-model API cohort; not the Gemini consumer application. | 12 | 100% | current | daily | Jul 27, 2026 | View table → |
| Legal AI buying-prompt leadersThe leading reviewed vendor for every neutral buying prompt, with exact cross-engine consensus. | 16 | 100% | current | daily | Jul 27, 2026 | View table → |
| Legal AI engine disagreementBuying prompts ranked by how differently the configured engines surface the reviewed vendor universe. | 16 | 100% | current | daily | Jul 27, 2026 | View table → |
| Legal AI prompt citation opportunitiesBuying prompts where the leading reviewed vendor appears across engines but its own domains are not cited. | 16 | 100% | current | daily | Jul 27, 2026 | View table → |
| Most-cited domains for legal ai buying promptsURL-derived citation hostnames ranked by complete-cohort cited-answer coverage, breadth, and position. | 135 | 100% | current | daily | Jul 27, 2026 | View table → |
Latest
Open full board →Current category leaders
| Rank | Entity | Published value | Movement | Confidence | Signal | Profile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Harveycompany | 41.7% | — | 100% | — | Evidence → |
| 02 | CoCounselcompany | 37.5% | — | 100% | — | Evidence → |
| 03 | Spellbookcompany | 37.5% | — | 100% | — | Evidence → |
| 04 | Clio Duocompany | 29.2% | — | 100% | — | Evidence → |
| 05 | Lexis+ AIcompany | 29.2% | — | 100% | — | Evidence → |
| 06 | Ironclad AIcompany | 8.3% | — | 100% | — | Evidence → |
| 07 | Paxton AIcompany | 8.3% | — | 100% | — | Evidence → |
| 08 | Evisortcompany | 8.3% | — | 100% | — | Evidence → |
| 09 | Luminancecompany | 4.2% | — | 100% | — | Evidence → |
| 10 | vLex Vincent AIcompany | 0.0% | — | 100% | — | Evidence → |
| 11 | Hebbiacompany | 0.0% | — | 100% | — | Evidence → |
| 12 | Legoracompany | 0.0% | — | 100% | — | Evidence → |
Corpus legal-ai-platforms-2026-07-27 / 3 providers
Test your own prompt →Questions shaping this market
| Buyer prompt | Intent | Current leader | Answers | Providers | Citations | Owned citations | Challenge |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Which legal AI platforms are best for research, drafting, review, analysis, citations, workflow, security, and professional accountability? | recommendation | CoCounsel · 10 | 3 | 3 | 24 | 5 | Run live → |
| Recommend a legal AI platform for cited case, statute, regulation, secondary-source, and jurisdiction-specific research with verification. | recommendation | CoCounsel · 5 | 3 | 3 | 17 | 0 | Run live → |
| Which legal AI platforms are strongest for contract review, extraction, playbooks, redlines, risk, comparison, and approval workflows? | recommendation | Harvey · 4 | 3 | 3 | 21 | 0 | Run live → |
| Recommend a legal AI platform for drafting and revising agreements, briefs, memos, correspondence, clauses, and transaction documents. | recommendation | Spellbook · 6 | 3 | 3 | 21 | 2 | Run live → |
| Which legal AI platforms are best for litigation teams handling discovery, chronologies, evidence, depositions, motions, authorities, and case strategy? | recommendation | Lexis+ AI · 2 | 3 | 3 | 22 | 3 | Run live → |
| Recommend a legal AI platform for an in-house team managing contracts, requests, policies, knowledge, outside counsel, and business self-service. | recommendation | Harvey · 3 | 3 | 3 | 22 | 2 | Run live → |
| Which legal AI platforms are strongest for a law firm that needs matter controls, knowledge integration, auditability, adoption, and support? | recommendation | Harvey · 8 | 3 | 3 | 24 | 6 | Run live → |
| Recommend an affordable legal AI platform for a small practice that needs reliable research, drafting, document review, and clear limits. | recommendation | CoCounsel · 3 | 3 | 3 | 18 | 5 | Run live → |
| Compare legal AI platforms on accuracy, citations, jurisdictions, workflows, integrations, confidentiality, governance, support, and price. | commercial | Harvey · 17 | 3 | 3 | 25 | 4 | Run live → |
| Create a reproducible legal AI evaluation covering authority validity, citation support, jurisdiction, dates, holdings, exceptions, and hallucinations. | commercial | — | 3 | 3 | 10 | 1 | Run live → |
| Design a contract-review benchmark for legal AI using known clauses, missing terms, conflicts, defined terms, playbooks, redlines, and explanations. | commercial | — | 3 | 3 | 8 | 1 | Run live → |
| Compare legal AI platforms on privilege, confidentiality, model training, retention, encryption, permissions, residency, audit logs, and deletion. | commercial | Harvey · 9 | 3 | 3 | 25 | 4 | Run live → |
| Compare legal AI platforms on document, matter, contract, research, billing, email, identity, knowledge, API, and workflow integrations. | commercial | Harvey · 26 | 3 | 3 | 22 | 6 | Run live → |
| How should a buyer compare legal AI pricing across users, matters, documents, research content, modules, implementation, and support? | commercial | Lexis+ AI · 2 | 3 | 3 | 20 | 5 | Run live → |
| Which criteria expose research, document, playbook, clause, knowledge, matter, workflow, export, and API lock-in in a legal AI platform? | commercial | — | 3 | 3 | 19 | 3 | Run live → |
| Create a shortlist of legal AI vendors for a regulated organization standardizing governed legal research and document workflows. | commercial | Harvey · 5 | 3 | 3 | 21 | 4 | Run live → |
Use the public category as your baseline
Analyze this category →Browse every live table →