Category intelligence / ecosystem
AI research assistants
Web, scientific, diligence, and enterprise research products ranked across a fixed evidence-seeking corpus.
Evidence catalog
Open category terminal →Live Research AI tables
| Table | Coverage | Confidence | Freshness | Cadence | Updated | Open |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI research assistants rankReviewed AI research assistants ranked by recommendation-prompt presence across three configured model APIs. | 12 | 100% | current | daily | Jul 27, 2026 | View table → |
| AI research assistants presenceReviewed vendors ranked by presence across every answer in the complete category cohort. | 12 | 100% | current | daily | Jul 27, 2026 | View table → |
| AI research assistants citation shareReviewed vendors ranked by distinct answer-level citations to their canonical domains. | 12 | 100% | current | daily | Jul 27, 2026 | View table → |
| AI research assistants engine breadthReviewed vendors ranked by the number of configured model APIs on which they appear. | 12 | 100% | current | daily | Jul 27, 2026 | View table → |
| AI research assistants in OpenAI model API answersVendor presence in the fixed OpenAI configured-model API cohort; not the ChatGPT consumer application. | 12 | 100% | current | daily | Jul 27, 2026 | View table → |
| AI research assistants in Anthropic model API answersVendor presence in the fixed Anthropic configured-model API cohort; not the Claude consumer application. | 12 | 100% | current | daily | Jul 27, 2026 | View table → |
| AI research assistants in Gemini model API answersVendor presence in the fixed Gemini configured-model API cohort; not the Gemini consumer application. | 12 | 100% | current | daily | Jul 27, 2026 | View table → |
| AI research assistants buying-prompt leadersThe leading reviewed vendor for every neutral buying prompt, with exact cross-engine consensus. | 16 | 100% | current | daily | Jul 27, 2026 | View table → |
| AI research assistants engine disagreementBuying prompts ranked by how differently the configured engines surface the reviewed vendor universe. | 16 | 100% | current | daily | Jul 27, 2026 | View table → |
| AI research assistants prompt citation opportunitiesBuying prompts where the leading reviewed vendor appears across engines but its own domains are not cited. | 16 | 100% | current | daily | Jul 27, 2026 | View table → |
| Most-cited domains for research ai buying promptsURL-derived citation hostnames ranked by complete-cohort cited-answer coverage, breadth, and position. | 149 | 100% | current | daily | Jul 27, 2026 | View table → |
Latest
Open full board →Current category leaders
| Rank | Entity | Published value | Movement | Confidence | Signal | Profile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Elicitcompany | 58.3% | — | 100% | — | Evidence → |
| 02 | Consensuscompany | 37.5% | — | 100% | — | Evidence → |
| 03 | Perplexitycompany | 20.8% | — | 100% | — | Evidence → |
| 04 | SciSpacecompany | 16.7% | — | 100% | — | Evidence → |
| 05 | Semantic Scholarcompany | 8.3% | — | 100% | — | Evidence → |
| 06 | NotebookLMcompany | 8.3% | — | 100% | — | Evidence → |
| 07 | scitecompany | 8.3% | — | 100% | — | Evidence → |
| 08 | Gemini Deep Researchcompany | 4.2% | — | 100% | — | Evidence → |
| 09 | OpenAI Deep Researchcompany | 4.2% | — | 100% | — | Evidence → |
| 10 | Claude Researchcompany | 0.0% | — | 100% | — | Evidence → |
| 11 | Gensparkcompany | 0.0% | — | 100% | — | Evidence → |
| 12 | You.com ARIcompany | 0.0% | — | 100% | — | Evidence → |
Corpus ai-research-assistants-2026-07-27 / 3 providers
Test your own prompt →Questions shaping this market
| Buyer prompt | Intent | Current leader | Answers | Providers | Citations | Owned citations | Challenge |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Which AI research assistants are best for finding, synthesizing, and citing reliable sources across complex questions? | recommendation | Elicit · 4 | 3 | 3 | 22 | 1 | Run live → |
| Recommend an AI research assistant for scientific literature search, paper screening, evidence extraction, synthesis, and traceable citations. | recommendation | Elicit · 4 | 3 | 3 | 18 | 3 | Run live → |
| Which AI research assistants are strongest for a systematic review with reproducible queries, inclusion criteria, data extraction, and audit trails? | recommendation | Elicit · 5 | 3 | 3 | 20 | 0 | Run live → |
| Recommend an AI research assistant for company, market, competitor, and industry research using current public sources with citations. | recommendation | Perplexity · 6 | 3 | 3 | 17 | 3 | Run live → |
| Which AI research assistants are best for commercial due diligence that must distinguish filings, company claims, estimates, and third-party evidence? | recommendation | — | 3 | 3 | 21 | 0 | Run live → |
| Recommend an enterprise AI research assistant with private-data controls, team workspaces, source permissions, administration, and compliance. | recommendation | Perplexity · 1 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 1 | Run live → |
| Which AI research assistants are strongest for current web research that requires broad retrieval, source diversity, recency, and cited synthesis? | recommendation | Consensus · 5 | 3 | 3 | 20 | 0 | Run live → |
| Recommend an affordable AI research assistant for a student who needs source discovery, paper explanations, citation checking, and note organization. | recommendation | Consensus · 3 | 3 | 3 | 18 | 0 | Run live → |
| Compare AI research assistants on retrieval coverage, source quality, citation accuracy, synthesis, exports, collaboration, privacy, and price. | commercial | Elicit · 17 | 3 | 3 | 20 | 2 | Run live → |
| Create a reproducible citation-accuracy test for AI research assistants covering source existence, claim support, quotation, attribution, and recency. | commercial | — | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | Run live → |
| Design a retrieval benchmark for AI research assistants using known-item search, long-tail evidence, conflicting sources, dates, and paywalled material. | commercial | Semantic Scholar · 4 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 0 | Run live → |
| How should buyers compare AI research assistants on completeness, uncertainty, contradiction handling, evidence weighting, and unsupported claims? | commercial | — | 3 | 3 | 22 | 0 | Run live → |
| Compare AI research assistant pricing across seats, searches, reports, document uploads, premium sources, exports, APIs, and enterprise controls. | commercial | Elicit · 9 | 3 | 3 | 17 | 0 | Run live → |
| Compare AI research assistants on uploaded-document privacy, model training, retention, permissions, encryption, residency, audit logs, and deletion. | commercial | Perplexity · 11 | 3 | 3 | 21 | 2 | Run live → |
| Which criteria expose library, annotation, citation, report, workspace, source-access, export, and API lock-in in an AI research assistant? | commercial | — | 3 | 3 | 8 | 0 | Run live → |
| Create a shortlist of AI research assistant vendors for an evidence-heavy organization replacing ad hoc search and manual research briefs. | commercial | Elicit · 1 | 3 | 3 | 18 | 0 | Run live → |
Use the public category as your baseline
Analyze this category →Browse every live table →