Skip to content

Rank.ai Index

Collaboration prompt citation Opportunities

16 prompts ranked by how far the leader is named without its own site being cited.
Recorded Sep 29, 2026Rotating scheduleSource: Rank.ai's prompt benchmark: fixed buying questions put to the OpenAI, Anthropic and Google model APIs, with Rank.ai's web searchHow this board is measuredCSV / JSON

100 percentage_points

Compare workplace platforms on identity, encryption, external sharing, eDiscovery, retention, auditability, residency, and compliance. ranks first

Leading brand owned citation opportunity

16

Prompts ranked

Sep 29

Snapshot recorded

2026 · Rotating schedule

3

Answers behind each row

From the OpenAI, Anthropic and Google model APIs

Follow changes

All 16 prompts by leading brand owned citation opportunity

Compare workplace platforms on identity, encryption, external sharing, eDiscovery, retention, auditability, residency, and compliance. leads at 100 percentage_points; the middle of the board sits at 33.3.

Ahead of second place
33.3
Held by the top three
44%
Middle of the board
33.3
Below half the leader
10 of 16
Rank, name and leading brand owned citation opportunityMiddle 33.3
  1. 1Compare workplace platforms on identity, encryption, external sharing, eDiscovery, retention, auditability, residency, and compliance.100 percentage_points
  2. 2Which productivity and collaboration suites are best for email, documents, meetings, messaging, storage, search, and administration?66.667 percentage_points
  3. 3Create a shortlist of collaboration vendors for a global company modernizing communication, content, meetings, work management, and AI.66.667 percentage_points
  4. 4Recommend a collaboration platform for a global enterprise with identity, compliance, records, security, integrations, and centralized governance.66.667 percentage_points
  5. 5Which content collaboration platforms are best for secure file sharing, external collaboration, governance, workflows, and enterprise search?66.667 percentage_points
  6. 6Compare workplace vendors while controlling for suite bundling, installed base, switching cost, standalone quality, and interoperability.66.667 percentage_points
  7. 7Recommend a workspace for company knowledge, collaborative docs, databases, projects, templates, search, and employee self-service.33.333 percentage_points
  8. 8Compare collaboration platforms on documents, communication, projects, search, AI, integrations, administration, security, and support.33.333 percentage_points
  9. 9Which workplace platforms provide the strongest governed AI for search, writing, meetings, analysis, tasks, and cross-application actions?33.333 percentage_points
  10. 10Recommend a collaboration platform for meetings, chat, phone, rooms, recordings, summaries, action items, and hybrid work.0 percentage_points
  11. 11Which collaboration platform is best for a startup that needs documents, projects, messaging, meetings, search, and low administration overhead?0 percentage_points
  12. 12Which work-management platforms are strongest for cross-functional projects, portfolios, goals, workflows, capacity, and executive reporting?0 percentage_points
  13. 13When should a company consolidate email, meetings, messaging, documents, files, projects, search, and AI on one workplace suite?0 percentage_points
  14. 14Which criteria expose export, identity, workflow, content-format, and commercial lock-in risk when choosing a collaboration platform?0 percentage_points
  15. 15How should a buyer compare workplace software pricing across seats, storage, meetings, telephony, AI, guests, security, and premium modules?0 percentage_points
  16. 16Create a proof-of-concept scorecard for collaboration platforms covering adoption, search success, meeting load, workflow speed, and administration.0 percentage_points

The prompt boards are re-run in rotation, about one category a day, so each board refreshes every few weeks and shows the date of its snapshot.

leading brand owned citation coverage: 0 on 11 of 16 rows · 3 checks behind each row · 100% confidence across rows.

Collaboration prompt citation Opportunities current rankings
RankNameLeading brand owned citation opportunityPresence eventsCitation URLSDistinct reviewed brandsChangeWhy
01Compare workplace platforms on identity, encryption, external sharing, eDiscovery, retention, auditability, residency, and compliance.100 percentage_points6163 7This rankRun it
02Which productivity and collaboration suites are best for email, documents, meetings, messaging, storage, search, and administration?66.667 percentage_points896 2ShowingRun it
03Create a shortlist of collaboration vendors for a global company modernizing communication, content, meetings, work management, and AI.66.667 percentage_points7105 8This rankRun it
04Recommend a collaboration platform for a global enterprise with identity, compliance, records, security, integrations, and centralized governance.66.667 percentage_points6134 1This rankRun it
05Which content collaboration platforms are best for secure file sharing, external collaboration, governance, workflows, and enterprise search?66.667 percentage_points6134 2This rankRun it
06Compare workplace vendors while controlling for suite bundling, installed base, switching cost, standalone quality, and interoperability.66.667 percentage_points663 10This rankRun it
07Recommend a workspace for company knowledge, collaborative docs, databases, projects, templates, search, and employee self-service.33.333 percentage_points10127 5This rankRun it
08Compare collaboration platforms on documents, communication, projects, search, AI, integrations, administration, security, and support.33.333 percentage_points7137 3This rankRun it
09Which workplace platforms provide the strongest governed AI for search, writing, meetings, analysis, tasks, and cross-application actions?33.333 percentage_points5185 1This rankRun it
10Recommend a collaboration platform for meetings, chat, phone, rooms, recordings, summaries, action items, and hybrid work.0 percentage_points8184 4This rankRun it
11Which collaboration platform is best for a startup that needs documents, projects, messaging, meetings, search, and low administration overhead?0 percentage_points11127 10This rankRun it
12Which work-management platforms are strongest for cross-functional projects, portfolios, goals, workflows, capacity, and executive reporting?0 percentage_points7144 3This rankRun it
13When should a company consolidate email, meetings, messaging, documents, files, projects, search, and AI on one workplace suite?0 percentage_points1141 This rankRun it
14Which criteria expose export, identity, workflow, content-format, and commercial lock-in risk when choosing a collaboration platform?0 percentage_points0120 This rankRun it
15How should a buyer compare workplace software pricing across seats, storage, meetings, telephony, AI, guests, security, and premium modules?0 percentage_points060 3This rankRun it
16Create a proof-of-concept scorecard for collaboration platforms covering adoption, search success, meeting load, workflow speed, and administration.0 percentage_points000 1This rankRun it

Why this rank

Which productivity and collaboration suites are best for email, documents, meetings, messaging, storage, search, and administration? on Collaboration Prompt Citation Opportunities

Derives prompt-level brand leaders, cross-engine brand-set disagreement, and leading-brand owned-citation opportunity from the complete public Rank.ai benchmark cohort.

2

Rank on this board

66.667 percent

Score

3

Answers behind the score

100% confidence · 1 of 1 components evidenced

What the score is built from

1 of 1 evidenced

Every component evidenced · 1 evidence record each

Components of Which productivity and collaboration suites are best for email, documents, meetings, messaging, storage, search, and administration?'s score
ComponentValueContribution
Leading brand owned citation gap66.66666766.667

Moved up since the previous snapshot

+2 places
  1. Engine disagreement83.333 to 88.889
    +5.556
  2. Citation URLS7 to 9
    +2
  3. Presence events9 to 8
    -1
  4. Distinct reviewed brands6 to 6
    0
  5. Leading brand consensus66.667 to 66.667
    0
  6. Leading brand owned citation coverage0 to 0
    0
  7. Leading brand owned citation gap66.667 to 66.667
    0

Where each number comes from

7 public records
  • Reviewed-brand presence eventsPresence events · observed Sep 29, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC8 presence_events100% confidence
    Source
    Rank.ai Collaboration Prompt Benchmark
    Grade
    A
    Freshness
    fresh
    Locator
    {"promptSlug":"best-productivity-suite","corpusVersion":"collaboration-productivity-platforms-2026-07-27","runArtifactIds":["fe6bed36-75ff-4c79-b074-9de0b04a1307","8dd55cfd-4718-4627-b90e-f475a87eea5d","49fdbd2d-5d72-45fc-b01a-ef42a688a1ad"],"parentSnapshotId":"6b53df6a-6171-46e9-9ae7-0db887a678b6","providerMatrixVersion":"64232fd32583"}
    Open the source
  • Distinct citation URLsCitation URLS · observed Sep 29, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC9 urls100% confidence
    Source
    Rank.ai Collaboration Prompt Benchmark
    Grade
    A
    Freshness
    fresh
    Locator
    {"promptSlug":"best-productivity-suite","corpusVersion":"collaboration-productivity-platforms-2026-07-27","runArtifactIds":["fe6bed36-75ff-4c79-b074-9de0b04a1307","8dd55cfd-4718-4627-b90e-f475a87eea5d","49fdbd2d-5d72-45fc-b01a-ef42a688a1ad"],"parentSnapshotId":"6b53df6a-6171-46e9-9ae7-0db887a678b6","providerMatrixVersion":"64232fd32583"}
    Open the source
  • Distinct reviewed brands surfacedDistinct reviewed brands · observed Sep 29, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC6 brands100% confidence
    Source
    Rank.ai Collaboration Prompt Benchmark
    Grade
    A
    Freshness
    fresh
    Locator
    {"promptSlug":"best-productivity-suite","corpusVersion":"collaboration-productivity-platforms-2026-07-27","runArtifactIds":["fe6bed36-75ff-4c79-b074-9de0b04a1307","8dd55cfd-4718-4627-b90e-f475a87eea5d","49fdbd2d-5d72-45fc-b01a-ef42a688a1ad"],"parentSnapshotId":"6b53df6a-6171-46e9-9ae7-0db887a678b6","providerMatrixVersion":"64232fd32583"}
    Open the source
  • Cross-engine brand disagreementEngine disagreement · observed Sep 29, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC88.889 percent100% confidence
    Source
    Rank.ai Collaboration Prompt Benchmark
    Grade
    A
    Freshness
    fresh
    Locator
    {"promptSlug":"best-productivity-suite","corpusVersion":"collaboration-productivity-platforms-2026-07-27","runArtifactIds":["fe6bed36-75ff-4c79-b074-9de0b04a1307","8dd55cfd-4718-4627-b90e-f475a87eea5d","49fdbd2d-5d72-45fc-b01a-ef42a688a1ad"],"parentSnapshotId":"6b53df6a-6171-46e9-9ae7-0db887a678b6","providerMatrixVersion":"64232fd32583"}
    Open the source
  • Leading-brand engine consensusLeading brand consensus · observed Sep 29, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC66.667 percent100% confidence
    Source
    Rank.ai Collaboration Prompt Benchmark
    Grade
    A
    Freshness
    fresh
    Locator
    {"promptSlug":"best-productivity-suite","corpusVersion":"collaboration-productivity-platforms-2026-07-27","runArtifactIds":["fe6bed36-75ff-4c79-b074-9de0b04a1307","8dd55cfd-4718-4627-b90e-f475a87eea5d","49fdbd2d-5d72-45fc-b01a-ef42a688a1ad"],"parentSnapshotId":"6b53df6a-6171-46e9-9ae7-0db887a678b6","providerMatrixVersion":"64232fd32583"}
    Open the source
  • Leading-brand owned-citation coverageLeading brand owned citation coverage · observed Sep 29, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC0 percent100% confidence
    Source
    Rank.ai Collaboration Prompt Benchmark
    Grade
    A
    Freshness
    fresh
    Locator
    {"promptSlug":"best-productivity-suite","corpusVersion":"collaboration-productivity-platforms-2026-07-27","runArtifactIds":["fe6bed36-75ff-4c79-b074-9de0b04a1307","8dd55cfd-4718-4627-b90e-f475a87eea5d","49fdbd2d-5d72-45fc-b01a-ef42a688a1ad"],"parentSnapshotId":"6b53df6a-6171-46e9-9ae7-0db887a678b6","providerMatrixVersion":"64232fd32583"}
    Open the source
  • Leading-brand owned-citation opportunityLeading brand owned citation gap · observed Sep 29, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC66.667 percentage_points100% confidence
    Source
    Rank.ai Collaboration Prompt Benchmark
    Grade
    A
    Freshness
    fresh
    Locator
    {"promptSlug":"best-productivity-suite","corpusVersion":"collaboration-productivity-platforms-2026-07-27","runArtifactIds":["fe6bed36-75ff-4c79-b074-9de0b04a1307","8dd55cfd-4718-4627-b90e-f475a87eea5d","49fdbd2d-5d72-45fc-b01a-ef42a688a1ad"],"parentSnapshotId":"6b53df6a-6171-46e9-9ae7-0db887a678b6","providerMatrixVersion":"64232fd32583"}
    Open the source
Public Collaboration prompt leaders, engine disagreement, and citation opportunity, version 2-parent-b17099dda23e66d0112 observations · 1 source · quality passed
Snapshot
27bdae68-4c0c-4c90-af71-779e118ffcef
Data hash
0ccacb16f8d9ccf7173d2f35d1c76681dadfe455a5140f6327161b2c7cacdd24
Method hash
ca527ebf33ef8e93e2229042b0d11db8d62031d42ed955d93fff39e759b1aacd

Enter your website. In about two minutes, Rank.ai asks ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini 12 questions your customers ask and grades how often they name you.

  • Your grade out of 100How often AI names you, cites your site, and how high it ranks you.
  • Who gets namedEvery competitor in the answers, most named first.
  • The pages AI readsThe sources behind each answer.
  • Three fixesWhat to fix first, with a brief for the first article.