SYNCING VERIFIED SOURCES

Loading ranking table…

Loading the latest published snapshot and its supporting evidence.

Most-cited domains in AI Research Assistants answers | Rank.ai

RANK.AI DATA / Latest

Most-cited domains in AI Research Assistants answers

Domains ranked by unique cited-answer coverage across Rank.ai's complete public prompt benchmark. This measures sourcing visibility—not recommendation or authority.

Coverage: 149 entities
Confidence: 100%
Freshness: current
Export: CSV / JSON

PUBLIC VIEW / NO LOGINTrack this exact boardFilters and comparisons stay in the URL. Bookmark it, share it, or follow verified snapshot changes.

Follow changes

Watching publication Jul 27, 2026

LEADERBOARD

Current rankings

Metric: Cited-answer coverage

Find in tableEntity typeMovementConfidenceEvidence NRank rangeColumnsSort rows

149of 149 rows

Most-cited domains in AI Research Assistants answers current rankings
Rank	Entity	Cited-answer coverage	Public Prompt Source Best Position	Public Prompt Source Cited Answer Count	Public Prompt Source Distinct Url Count	Public Prompt Source Engine Breadth	Public Prompt Source Mean Position	Public Prompt Source Median Position	Confidence	N	Change	Trend	Explain
01	paperguide.aisource	27.1%	1	13	9	3	3.8	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
02	youtube.comsource	25.0%	1	12	11	3	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
03	reddit.comsource	22.9%	2	11	9	3	4.6	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
04	atlasworkspace.aisource	20.8%	2	10	5	3	4.8	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
05	listenlabs.aisource	20.8%	1	10	5	2	2.8	2.5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
06	facebook.comsource	10.4%	1	5	5	3	2.2	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
07	medium.comsource	10.4%	2	5	5	3	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
08	linkedin.comsource	10.4%	2	5	4	3	5.4	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
09	litmaps.comsource	8.3%	1	4	1	2	4	3.5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
10	infoguides.gmu.edusource	6.3%	1	3	1	3	1.7	1	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
11	hebbia.comsource	6.3%	2	3	2	3	2	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
12	scispace.comsource	6.3%	1	3	3	2	2.3	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
13	studytexter.comsource	6.3%	1	3	1	2	2.7	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
14	arxiv.orgsource	6.3%	2	3	3	2	4.3	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
15	teach.its.uiowa.edusource	6.3%	2	3	1	2	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
16	thesify.aisource	6.3%	1	3	2	2	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
17	cypris.aisource	6.3%	4	3	1	2	4.7	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
18	clarivate.comsource	6.3%	1	3	1	1	3	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
19	elicit.comsource	4.2%	1	2	1	2	1	1	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
20	martecgroup.comsource	4.2%	1	2	1	2	1	1	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
21	researchguides.library.syr.edusource	4.2%	1	2	1	2	1.5	1.5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
22	sciencedirect.comsource	4.2%	1	2	2	2	1.5	1.5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
23	guides.lib.purdue.edusource	4.2%	1	2	1	2	2	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
24	guides.libs.uga.edusource	4.2%	1	2	1	2	2	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
25	premai.iosource	4.2%	1	2	1	2	2	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
26	manus.imsource	4.2%	1	2	1	2	2.5	2.5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
27	guides.library.georgetown.edusource	4.2%	1	2	1	2	3	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
28	paperpal.comsource	4.2%	2	2	1	2	3.5	3.5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
29	researchgate.netsource	4.2%	1	2	2	2	3.5	3.5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
30	papersflow.aisource	4.2%	2	2	2	2	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
31	scite.aisource	4.2%	2	2	1	2	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
32	undermind.aisource	4.2%	3	2	1	2	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
33	backplain.comsource	4.2%	4	2	1	2	4.5	4.5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
34	researcher.lifesource	4.2%	4	2	1	2	4.5	4.5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
35	asteripartners.comsource	4.2%	3	2	1	2	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
36	casrai.orgsource	4.2%	3	2	2	2	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
37	guides.temple.edusource	4.2%	3	2	2	2	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
38	libguides.kcl.ac.uksource	4.2%	3	2	1	2	5.5	5.5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
39	pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.govsource	4.2%	6	2	2	2	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
40	sourcely.netsource	4.2%	5	2	2	2	6.5	6.5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
41	huit.harvard.edusource	4.2%	1	2	1	1	1.5	1.5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
42	editage.ussource	4.2%	2	2	1	1	2	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
43	mindstudio.aisource	4.2%	6	2	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
44	zerve.aisource	4.2%	6	2	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
45	agent-finder.cosource	2.1%	1	1	1	1	1	1	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
46	ai.google.devsource	2.1%	1	1	1	1	1	1	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
47	ai.milsource	2.1%	1	1	1	1	1	1	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
48	articulate.comsource	2.1%	1	1	1	1	1	1	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
49	brightinventions.plsource	2.1%	1	1	1	1	1	1	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
50	github.comsource	2.1%	1	1	1	1	1	1	100%	48	—	—	Viewing why
51	iopscience.iop.orgsource	2.1%	1	1	1	1	1	1	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
52	katinamagazine.orgsource	2.1%	1	1	1	1	1	1	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
53	lesswrong.comsource	2.1%	1	1	1	1	1	1	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
54	libguides.ucmerced.edusource	2.1%	1	1	1	1	1	1	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
55	readwonders.comsource	2.1%	1	1	1	1	1	1	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
56	sp-sg.libguides.comsource	2.1%	1	1	1	1	1	1	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
57	supalabs.cosource	2.1%	1	1	1	1	1	1	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
58	tandfonline.comsource	2.1%	1	1	1	1	1	1	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
59	vellum.aisource	2.1%	1	1	1	1	1	1	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
60	zylon.aisource	2.1%	1	1	1	1	1	1	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
61	clickforest.comsource	2.1%	2	1	1	1	2	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
62	cybernews.comsource	2.1%	2	1	1	1	2	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
63	greenbook.orgsource	2.1%	2	1	1	1	2	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
64	intuitionlabs.aisource	2.1%	2	1	1	1	2	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
65	ischool.sjsu.edusource	2.1%	2	1	1	1	2	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
66	knowledgie.comsource	2.1%	2	1	1	1	2	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
67	nerdify.medium.comsource	2.1%	2	1	1	1	2	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
68	neura.marketsource	2.1%	2	1	1	1	2	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
69	openai.comsource	2.1%	2	1	1	1	2	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
70	productify.substack.comsource	2.1%	2	1	1	1	2	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
71	purdue.edusource	2.1%	2	1	1	1	2	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
72	resources.rework.comsource	2.1%	2	1	1	1	2	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
73	streebo.comsource	2.1%	2	1	1	1	2	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
74	uco.essource	2.1%	2	1	1	1	2	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
75	huggingface.cosource	2.1%	3	1	1	1	3	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
76	klue.comsource	2.1%	3	1	1	1	3	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
77	learn.microsoft.comsource	2.1%	3	1	1	1	3	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
78	leewayhertz.comsource	2.1%	3	1	1	1	3	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
79	libguides.mskcc.orgsource	2.1%	3	1	1	1	3	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
80	lumivero.comsource	2.1%	3	1	1	1	3	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
81	northboundadvisory.comsource	2.1%	3	1	1	1	3	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
82	slo.oregon.govsource	2.1%	3	1	1	1	3	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
83	stackcyber.comsource	2.1%	3	1	1	1	3	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
84	support.google.comsource	2.1%	3	1	1	1	3	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
85	techpoint.africasource	2.1%	3	1	1	1	3	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
86	vertesiahq.comsource	2.1%	3	1	1	1	3	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
87	discuss.ai.google.devsource	2.1%	2	1	3	1	3.7	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
88	assindo.comsource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
89	blog.tcea.orgsource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
90	consensus.appsource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
91	creativebitsai.comsource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
92	devopsschool.comsource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
93	edubrain.aisource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
94	greatquestion.cosource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
95	inra.aisource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
96	kx.comsource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
97	noticias.foxnews.comsource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
98	philarchive.orgsource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
99	pubrica.comsource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
100	valonaintelligence.comsource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
101	vaquill.aisource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
102	wjarr.comsource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
103	xpander.aisource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
104	zilliz.comsource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
105	suprmind.aisource	2.1%	2	1	2	1	4.5	4.5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
106	ainanza.comsource	2.1%	5	1	1	1	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
107	complexdiscovery.comsource	2.1%	5	1	1	1	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
108	datasets-benchmarks-proceedings.neurips.ccsource	2.1%	5	1	1	1	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
109	evernote.comsource	2.1%	5	1	1	1	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
110	grata.comsource	2.1%	5	1	1	1	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
111	info.library.okstate.edusource	2.1%	5	1	1	1	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
112	libguides.hkust.edu.hksource	2.1%	5	1	1	1	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
113	lyssna.comsource	2.1%	5	1	1	1	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
114	papers.ssrn.comsource	2.1%	5	1	1	1	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
115	pcmag.comsource	2.1%	5	1	1	1	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
116	predictableinnovation.comsource	2.1%	5	1	1	1	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
117	preprints.orgsource	2.1%	5	1	1	1	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
118	prophia.comsource	2.1%	5	1	1	1	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
119	salve.libguides.comsource	2.1%	5	1	1	1	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
120	scholarai.iosource	2.1%	5	1	1	1	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
121	anarlog.sosource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
122	bigid.comsource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
123	cleverx.comsource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
124	community.openai.comsource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
125	dl.acm.orgsource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
126	elastic.cosource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
127	kimi.comsource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
128	lib.arizona.edusource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
129	libguides.lmu.edusource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
130	libguides.ohsu.edusource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
131	nicholashagar.medium.comsource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
132	privacyguides.orgsource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
133	researchpal.cosource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
134	tamu.libguides.comsource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
135	ticnote.comsource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
136	tribe.aisource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
137	aiagents.saastrac.comsource	2.1%	7	1	1	1	7	7	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
138	blog.laozhang.aisource	2.1%	7	1	1	1	7	7	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
139	jdsupra.comsource	2.1%	7	1	1	1	7	7	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
140	mirfan99.substack.comsource	2.1%	7	1	1	1	7	7	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
141	openreview.netsource	2.1%	7	1	1	1	7	7	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
142	stytch.comsource	2.1%	7	1	1	1	7	7	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
143	touchstoneresearch.comsource	2.1%	7	1	1	1	7	7	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
144	workspace.google.comsource	2.1%	7	1	1	1	7	7	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
145	datadiligence.comsource	2.1%	8	1	1	1	8	8	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
146	docs.cloud.google.comsource	2.1%	8	1	1	1	8	8	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
147	sapiosciences.comsource	2.1%	8	1	1	1	8	8	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
148	ai-compass.insource	2.1%	9	1	1	1	9	9	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
149	legal.thomsonreuters.comsource	2.1%	9	1	1	1	9	9	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank

Most-cited domains in AI Research Assistants answers current rankings
Rank	Entity	Cited-answer coverage	Public Prompt Source Best Position	Public Prompt Source Cited Answer Count	Public Prompt Source Distinct Url Count	Public Prompt Source Engine Breadth	Public Prompt Source Mean Position	Public Prompt Source Median Position	Confidence	N	Change	Trend	Explain
01	paperguide.aisource	27.1%	1	13	9	3	3.8	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
02	youtube.comsource	25.0%	1	12	11	3	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
03	reddit.comsource	22.9%	2	11	9	3	4.6	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
04	atlasworkspace.aisource	20.8%	2	10	5	3	4.8	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
05	listenlabs.aisource	20.8%	1	10	5	2	2.8	2.5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
06	facebook.comsource	10.4%	1	5	5	3	2.2	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
07	medium.comsource	10.4%	2	5	5	3	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
08	linkedin.comsource	10.4%	2	5	4	3	5.4	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
09	litmaps.comsource	8.3%	1	4	1	2	4	3.5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
10	infoguides.gmu.edusource	6.3%	1	3	1	3	1.7	1	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
11	hebbia.comsource	6.3%	2	3	2	3	2	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
12	scispace.comsource	6.3%	1	3	3	2	2.3	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
13	studytexter.comsource	6.3%	1	3	1	2	2.7	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
14	arxiv.orgsource	6.3%	2	3	3	2	4.3	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
15	teach.its.uiowa.edusource	6.3%	2	3	1	2	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
16	thesify.aisource	6.3%	1	3	2	2	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
17	cypris.aisource	6.3%	4	3	1	2	4.7	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
18	clarivate.comsource	6.3%	1	3	1	1	3	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
19	elicit.comsource	4.2%	1	2	1	2	1	1	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
20	martecgroup.comsource	4.2%	1	2	1	2	1	1	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
21	researchguides.library.syr.edusource	4.2%	1	2	1	2	1.5	1.5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
22	sciencedirect.comsource	4.2%	1	2	2	2	1.5	1.5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
23	guides.lib.purdue.edusource	4.2%	1	2	1	2	2	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
24	guides.libs.uga.edusource	4.2%	1	2	1	2	2	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
25	premai.iosource	4.2%	1	2	1	2	2	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
26	manus.imsource	4.2%	1	2	1	2	2.5	2.5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
27	guides.library.georgetown.edusource	4.2%	1	2	1	2	3	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
28	paperpal.comsource	4.2%	2	2	1	2	3.5	3.5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
29	researchgate.netsource	4.2%	1	2	2	2	3.5	3.5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
30	papersflow.aisource	4.2%	2	2	2	2	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
31	scite.aisource	4.2%	2	2	1	2	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
32	undermind.aisource	4.2%	3	2	1	2	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
33	backplain.comsource	4.2%	4	2	1	2	4.5	4.5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
34	researcher.lifesource	4.2%	4	2	1	2	4.5	4.5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
35	asteripartners.comsource	4.2%	3	2	1	2	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
36	casrai.orgsource	4.2%	3	2	2	2	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
37	guides.temple.edusource	4.2%	3	2	2	2	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
38	libguides.kcl.ac.uksource	4.2%	3	2	1	2	5.5	5.5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
39	pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.govsource	4.2%	6	2	2	2	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
40	sourcely.netsource	4.2%	5	2	2	2	6.5	6.5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
41	huit.harvard.edusource	4.2%	1	2	1	1	1.5	1.5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
42	editage.ussource	4.2%	2	2	1	1	2	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
43	mindstudio.aisource	4.2%	6	2	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
44	zerve.aisource	4.2%	6	2	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
45	agent-finder.cosource	2.1%	1	1	1	1	1	1	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
46	ai.google.devsource	2.1%	1	1	1	1	1	1	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
47	ai.milsource	2.1%	1	1	1	1	1	1	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
48	articulate.comsource	2.1%	1	1	1	1	1	1	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
49	brightinventions.plsource	2.1%	1	1	1	1	1	1	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
50	github.comsource	2.1%	1	1	1	1	1	1	100%	48	—	—	Viewing why
51	iopscience.iop.orgsource	2.1%	1	1	1	1	1	1	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
52	katinamagazine.orgsource	2.1%	1	1	1	1	1	1	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
53	lesswrong.comsource	2.1%	1	1	1	1	1	1	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
54	libguides.ucmerced.edusource	2.1%	1	1	1	1	1	1	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
55	readwonders.comsource	2.1%	1	1	1	1	1	1	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
56	sp-sg.libguides.comsource	2.1%	1	1	1	1	1	1	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
57	supalabs.cosource	2.1%	1	1	1	1	1	1	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
58	tandfonline.comsource	2.1%	1	1	1	1	1	1	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
59	vellum.aisource	2.1%	1	1	1	1	1	1	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
60	zylon.aisource	2.1%	1	1	1	1	1	1	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
61	clickforest.comsource	2.1%	2	1	1	1	2	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
62	cybernews.comsource	2.1%	2	1	1	1	2	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
63	greenbook.orgsource	2.1%	2	1	1	1	2	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
64	intuitionlabs.aisource	2.1%	2	1	1	1	2	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
65	ischool.sjsu.edusource	2.1%	2	1	1	1	2	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
66	knowledgie.comsource	2.1%	2	1	1	1	2	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
67	nerdify.medium.comsource	2.1%	2	1	1	1	2	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
68	neura.marketsource	2.1%	2	1	1	1	2	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
69	openai.comsource	2.1%	2	1	1	1	2	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
70	productify.substack.comsource	2.1%	2	1	1	1	2	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
71	purdue.edusource	2.1%	2	1	1	1	2	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
72	resources.rework.comsource	2.1%	2	1	1	1	2	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
73	streebo.comsource	2.1%	2	1	1	1	2	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
74	uco.essource	2.1%	2	1	1	1	2	2	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
75	huggingface.cosource	2.1%	3	1	1	1	3	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
76	klue.comsource	2.1%	3	1	1	1	3	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
77	learn.microsoft.comsource	2.1%	3	1	1	1	3	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
78	leewayhertz.comsource	2.1%	3	1	1	1	3	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
79	libguides.mskcc.orgsource	2.1%	3	1	1	1	3	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
80	lumivero.comsource	2.1%	3	1	1	1	3	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
81	northboundadvisory.comsource	2.1%	3	1	1	1	3	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
82	slo.oregon.govsource	2.1%	3	1	1	1	3	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
83	stackcyber.comsource	2.1%	3	1	1	1	3	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
84	support.google.comsource	2.1%	3	1	1	1	3	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
85	techpoint.africasource	2.1%	3	1	1	1	3	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
86	vertesiahq.comsource	2.1%	3	1	1	1	3	3	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
87	discuss.ai.google.devsource	2.1%	2	1	3	1	3.7	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
88	assindo.comsource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
89	blog.tcea.orgsource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
90	consensus.appsource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
91	creativebitsai.comsource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
92	devopsschool.comsource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
93	edubrain.aisource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
94	greatquestion.cosource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
95	inra.aisource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
96	kx.comsource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
97	noticias.foxnews.comsource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
98	philarchive.orgsource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
99	pubrica.comsource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
100	valonaintelligence.comsource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
101	vaquill.aisource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
102	wjarr.comsource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
103	xpander.aisource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
104	zilliz.comsource	2.1%	4	1	1	1	4	4	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
105	suprmind.aisource	2.1%	2	1	2	1	4.5	4.5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
106	ainanza.comsource	2.1%	5	1	1	1	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
107	complexdiscovery.comsource	2.1%	5	1	1	1	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
108	datasets-benchmarks-proceedings.neurips.ccsource	2.1%	5	1	1	1	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
109	evernote.comsource	2.1%	5	1	1	1	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
110	grata.comsource	2.1%	5	1	1	1	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
111	info.library.okstate.edusource	2.1%	5	1	1	1	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
112	libguides.hkust.edu.hksource	2.1%	5	1	1	1	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
113	lyssna.comsource	2.1%	5	1	1	1	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
114	papers.ssrn.comsource	2.1%	5	1	1	1	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
115	pcmag.comsource	2.1%	5	1	1	1	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
116	predictableinnovation.comsource	2.1%	5	1	1	1	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
117	preprints.orgsource	2.1%	5	1	1	1	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
118	prophia.comsource	2.1%	5	1	1	1	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
119	salve.libguides.comsource	2.1%	5	1	1	1	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
120	scholarai.iosource	2.1%	5	1	1	1	5	5	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
121	anarlog.sosource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
122	bigid.comsource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
123	cleverx.comsource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
124	community.openai.comsource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
125	dl.acm.orgsource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
126	elastic.cosource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
127	kimi.comsource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
128	lib.arizona.edusource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
129	libguides.lmu.edusource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
130	libguides.ohsu.edusource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
131	nicholashagar.medium.comsource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
132	privacyguides.orgsource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
133	researchpal.cosource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
134	tamu.libguides.comsource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
135	ticnote.comsource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
136	tribe.aisource	2.1%	6	1	1	1	6	6	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
137	aiagents.saastrac.comsource	2.1%	7	1	1	1	7	7	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
138	blog.laozhang.aisource	2.1%	7	1	1	1	7	7	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
139	jdsupra.comsource	2.1%	7	1	1	1	7	7	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
140	mirfan99.substack.comsource	2.1%	7	1	1	1	7	7	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
141	openreview.netsource	2.1%	7	1	1	1	7	7	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
142	stytch.comsource	2.1%	7	1	1	1	7	7	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
143	touchstoneresearch.comsource	2.1%	7	1	1	1	7	7	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
144	workspace.google.comsource	2.1%	7	1	1	1	7	7	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
145	datadiligence.comsource	2.1%	8	1	1	1	8	8	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
146	docs.cloud.google.comsource	2.1%	8	1	1	1	8	8	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
147	sapiosciences.comsource	2.1%	8	1	1	1	8	8	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
148	ai-compass.insource	2.1%	9	1	1	1	9	9	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank
149	legal.thomsonreuters.comsource	2.1%	9	1	1	1	9	9	100%	48	—	—	Why this rank

Primary brandPrompt intentAnswer enginePrompt contains

Run live test

Answer presence20.8%10/48 filtered answers mention or cite Perplexity

Selected-set share20.8%Share of answer-presences among the compared brands, not market share

Owned citation answers00 answer-level URL signals on reviewed owned domains

Engine breadth3/3Engines with at least one observed presence

Filtered competitive answer-presence comparison
Brand	Presence	Vs. primary	Selected share	Mentions	Cited answers	Owned URL signals	Engine breadth
Elicitelicit.com	43.8%21/48	+22.9 pp	43.8%	47	2	2	3/3
Consensusconsensus.app	31.3%15/48	+10.4 pp	31.3%	36	1	1	3/3
Perplexityperplexity.ai	20.8%10/48	BASE	20.8%	40	0	0	3/3
scitescite.ai	4.2%2/48	-16.7 pp	4.2%	0	2	2	2/3

ANSWER-LEVEL OBSERVATIONS

Prompt × engine matrix

16 prompts · 48 immutable answer hashes · empty cells mean no compared brand was detected.

Brand presence by public prompt and answer engine
Public prompt	OpenAIopenai/gpt-4o-mini	Anthropicanthropic/claude-haiku-4-5	Geminigoogle/gemini-2.5-flash
01 Which AI research assistants are best for finding, synthesizing, and citing reliable sources across complex questions?recommendation	PerplexityElicit 6 source URLs`3b0ce0c0`	PerplexityElicitConsensus 9 source URLs`ace1aafa`	ElicitConsensus 7 source URLs`4b316ab9`
02 Recommend an AI research assistant for scientific literature search, paper screening, evidence extraction, synthesis, and traceable citations.recommendation	ElicitConsensus 5 source URLs`c0c47e5c`	ElicitConsensus 6 source URLs`f09eb973`	Elicit · C1scite · C1 7 source URLs`b5faf21c`
03 Which AI research assistants are strongest for a systematic review with reproducible queries, inclusion criteria, data extraction, and audit trails?recommendation	Elicit 6 source URLs`c37d9455`	No selected brand 8 source URLs`d5c3f71b`	Elicit 6 source URLs`6cf98546`
04 Recommend an AI research assistant for company, market, competitor, and industry research using current public sources with citations.recommendation	No selected brand 5 source URLs`5416d8e9`	PerplexityElicit · C1Consensus · C1scite · C1 6 source URLs`f0b99448`	No selected brand 6 source URLs`05a02373`
05 Which AI research assistants are best for commercial due diligence that must distinguish filings, company claims, estimates, and third-party evidence?recommendation	No selected brand 5 source URLs`915dc824`	No selected brand 7 source URLs`863a6952`	No selected brand 9 source URLs`21e0fd35`
06 Recommend an enterprise AI research assistant with private-data controls, team workspaces, source permissions, administration, and compliance.recommendation	No selected brand 4 source URLs`57fcbc8e`	Perplexity 1 source URLs`db225b42`	No selected brand 7 source URLs`2709bc7d`
07 Which AI research assistants are strongest for current web research that requires broad retrieval, source diversity, recency, and cited synthesis?recommendation	ElicitConsensus 7 source URLs`34973baa`	PerplexityElicitConsensus 6 source URLs`f5f6e729`	ElicitConsensus 7 source URLs`65f1dd16`
08 Recommend an affordable AI research assistant for a student who needs source discovery, paper explanations, citation checking, and note organization.recommendation	Elicit 7 source URLs`135bfb94`	ElicitConsensus 4 source URLs`ebce1540`	No selected brand 7 source URLs`10f2b7cf`
09 Compare AI research assistants on retrieval coverage, source quality, citation accuracy, synthesis, exports, collaboration, privacy, and price.commercial	ElicitConsensus 3 source URLs`c136ce86`	PerplexityElicitConsensus 9 source URLs`26cf4e2a`	PerplexityElicitConsensus 8 source URLs`acea1ec3`
10 Create a reproducible citation-accuracy test for AI research assistants covering source existence, claim support, quotation, attribution, and recency.commercial	No selected brand 0 source URLs`7c26e6e3`	No selected brand 2 source URLs`32d85eb2`	No selected brand 0 source URLs`89be2c54`
11 Design a retrieval benchmark for AI research assistants using known-item search, long-tail evidence, conflicting sources, dates, and paywalled material.commercial	No selected brand 0 source URLs`52784397`	No selected brand 7 source URLs`e96cd5ff`	No selected brand 0 source URLs`c9d050eb`
12 How should buyers compare AI research assistants on completeness, uncertainty, contradiction handling, evidence weighting, and unsupported claims?commercial	No selected brand 7 source URLs`7e54ed1a`	No selected brand 6 source URLs`52dc928f`	No selected brand 9 source URLs`622213b5`
13 Compare AI research assistant pricing across seats, searches, reports, document uploads, premium sources, exports, APIs, and enterprise controls.commercial	ElicitConsensus 5 source URLs`b3de8695`	PerplexityElicitConsensus 8 source URLs`8e36547e`	PerplexityElicitConsensus 4 source URLs`2f14103b`
14 Compare AI research assistants on uploaded-document privacy, model training, retention, permissions, encryption, residency, audit logs, and deletion.commercial	No selected brand 7 source URLs`f428e7eb`	Perplexity 8 source URLs`e5bc8238`	No selected brand 6 source URLs`57ea7631`
15 Which criteria expose library, annotation, citation, report, workspace, source-access, export, and API lock-in in an AI research assistant?commercial	No selected brand 6 source URLs`f0daee46`	No selected brand 0 source URLs`37018d22`	No selected brand 2 source URLs`e699ed30`
16 Create a shortlist of AI research assistant vendors for an evidence-heavy organization replacing ad hoc search and manual research briefs.commercial	No selected brand 4 source URLs`0a793a56`	Elicit 6 source URLs`e105826a`	No selected brand 8 source URLs`11abd267`

STRUCTURED CITATION LEDGER

Sources shaping this filtered view

Hostnames are derived from validated public HTTP(S) URLs, not provider-supplied domain labels.

Validated citation sources in filtered answers
Source hostname	Cited answers	Distinct URLs	Engine breadth	Best position	Evidence
paperguide.ai	13	9	3	#1	Open source ↗
youtube.com	12	11	3	#1	Open source ↗
reddit.com	11	9	3	#2	Open source ↗
listenlabs.ai	10	5	2	#1	Open source ↗
atlasworkspace.ai	10	5	3	#2	Open source ↗
facebook.com	5	5	3	#1	Open source ↗
medium.com	5	5	3	#2	Open source ↗
linkedin.com	5	4	3	#2	Open source ↗
litmaps.com	4	1	2	#1	Open source ↗
scispace.com	3	3	2	#1	Open source ↗
arxiv.org	3	3	2	#2	Open source ↗
thesify.ai	3	2	2	#1	Open source ↗
hebbia.com	3	2	3	#2	Open source ↗
clarivate.com	3	1	1	#1	Open source ↗
infoguides.gmu.edu	3	1	3	#1	Open source ↗
studytexter.com	3	1	2	#1	Open source ↗
teach.its.uiowa.edu	3	1	2	#2	Open source ↗
cypris.ai	3	1	2	#4	Open source ↗
researchgate.net	2	2	2	#1	Open source ↗
sciencedirect.com	2	2	2	#1	Open source ↗

PUBLIC-BENCHMARK PRIVACY BOUNDARY

This report contains only code-reviewed public prompts, deterministic brand counts, answer hashes, and validated structured citation URLs. Full model answers are neither stored nor published here. No customer, organization, or private tracked-prompt data is included.

ai-research-assistants-2026-07-27 / 4-ai-research-assistants-2026-07-27-models-64232fd32583

WHY THIS RANK

EXPLANATION UNAVAILABLE

The explanation service did not return a publishable result.

Primary brandPrompt intentAnswer enginePrompt contains

Run live test

Answer presence20.8%10/48 filtered answers mention or cite Perplexity

Selected-set share20.8%Share of answer-presences among the compared brands, not market share

Owned citation answers00 answer-level URL signals on reviewed owned domains

Engine breadth3/3Engines with at least one observed presence

Filtered competitive answer-presence comparison
Brand	Presence	Vs. primary	Selected share	Mentions	Cited answers	Owned URL signals	Engine breadth
Elicitelicit.com	43.8%21/48	+22.9 pp	43.8%	47	2	2	3/3
Consensusconsensus.app	31.3%15/48	+10.4 pp	31.3%	36	1	1	3/3
Perplexityperplexity.ai	20.8%10/48	BASE	20.8%	40	0	0	3/3
scitescite.ai	4.2%2/48	-16.7 pp	4.2%	0	2	2	2/3

ANSWER-LEVEL OBSERVATIONS

Prompt × engine matrix

16 prompts · 48 immutable answer hashes · empty cells mean no compared brand was detected.

Brand presence by public prompt and answer engine
Public prompt	OpenAIopenai/gpt-4o-mini	Anthropicanthropic/claude-haiku-4-5	Geminigoogle/gemini-2.5-flash
01 Which AI research assistants are best for finding, synthesizing, and citing reliable sources across complex questions?recommendation	PerplexityElicit 6 source URLs`3b0ce0c0`	PerplexityElicitConsensus 9 source URLs`ace1aafa`	ElicitConsensus 7 source URLs`4b316ab9`
02 Recommend an AI research assistant for scientific literature search, paper screening, evidence extraction, synthesis, and traceable citations.recommendation	ElicitConsensus 5 source URLs`c0c47e5c`	ElicitConsensus 6 source URLs`f09eb973`	Elicit · C1scite · C1 7 source URLs`b5faf21c`
03 Which AI research assistants are strongest for a systematic review with reproducible queries, inclusion criteria, data extraction, and audit trails?recommendation	Elicit 6 source URLs`c37d9455`	No selected brand 8 source URLs`d5c3f71b`	Elicit 6 source URLs`6cf98546`
04 Recommend an AI research assistant for company, market, competitor, and industry research using current public sources with citations.recommendation	No selected brand 5 source URLs`5416d8e9`	PerplexityElicit · C1Consensus · C1scite · C1 6 source URLs`f0b99448`	No selected brand 6 source URLs`05a02373`
05 Which AI research assistants are best for commercial due diligence that must distinguish filings, company claims, estimates, and third-party evidence?recommendation	No selected brand 5 source URLs`915dc824`	No selected brand 7 source URLs`863a6952`	No selected brand 9 source URLs`21e0fd35`
06 Recommend an enterprise AI research assistant with private-data controls, team workspaces, source permissions, administration, and compliance.recommendation	No selected brand 4 source URLs`57fcbc8e`	Perplexity 1 source URLs`db225b42`	No selected brand 7 source URLs`2709bc7d`
07 Which AI research assistants are strongest for current web research that requires broad retrieval, source diversity, recency, and cited synthesis?recommendation	ElicitConsensus 7 source URLs`34973baa`	PerplexityElicitConsensus 6 source URLs`f5f6e729`	ElicitConsensus 7 source URLs`65f1dd16`
08 Recommend an affordable AI research assistant for a student who needs source discovery, paper explanations, citation checking, and note organization.recommendation	Elicit 7 source URLs`135bfb94`	ElicitConsensus 4 source URLs`ebce1540`	No selected brand 7 source URLs`10f2b7cf`
09 Compare AI research assistants on retrieval coverage, source quality, citation accuracy, synthesis, exports, collaboration, privacy, and price.commercial	ElicitConsensus 3 source URLs`c136ce86`	PerplexityElicitConsensus 9 source URLs`26cf4e2a`	PerplexityElicitConsensus 8 source URLs`acea1ec3`
10 Create a reproducible citation-accuracy test for AI research assistants covering source existence, claim support, quotation, attribution, and recency.commercial	No selected brand 0 source URLs`7c26e6e3`	No selected brand 2 source URLs`32d85eb2`	No selected brand 0 source URLs`89be2c54`
11 Design a retrieval benchmark for AI research assistants using known-item search, long-tail evidence, conflicting sources, dates, and paywalled material.commercial	No selected brand 0 source URLs`52784397`	No selected brand 7 source URLs`e96cd5ff`	No selected brand 0 source URLs`c9d050eb`
12 How should buyers compare AI research assistants on completeness, uncertainty, contradiction handling, evidence weighting, and unsupported claims?commercial	No selected brand 7 source URLs`7e54ed1a`	No selected brand 6 source URLs`52dc928f`	No selected brand 9 source URLs`622213b5`
13 Compare AI research assistant pricing across seats, searches, reports, document uploads, premium sources, exports, APIs, and enterprise controls.commercial	ElicitConsensus 5 source URLs`b3de8695`	PerplexityElicitConsensus 8 source URLs`8e36547e`	PerplexityElicitConsensus 4 source URLs`2f14103b`
14 Compare AI research assistants on uploaded-document privacy, model training, retention, permissions, encryption, residency, audit logs, and deletion.commercial	No selected brand 7 source URLs`f428e7eb`	Perplexity 8 source URLs`e5bc8238`	No selected brand 6 source URLs`57ea7631`
15 Which criteria expose library, annotation, citation, report, workspace, source-access, export, and API lock-in in an AI research assistant?commercial	No selected brand 6 source URLs`f0daee46`	No selected brand 0 source URLs`37018d22`	No selected brand 2 source URLs`e699ed30`
16 Create a shortlist of AI research assistant vendors for an evidence-heavy organization replacing ad hoc search and manual research briefs.commercial	No selected brand 4 source URLs`0a793a56`	Elicit 6 source URLs`e105826a`	No selected brand 8 source URLs`11abd267`

STRUCTURED CITATION LEDGER

Sources shaping this filtered view

Hostnames are derived from validated public HTTP(S) URLs, not provider-supplied domain labels.

Validated citation sources in filtered answers
Source hostname	Cited answers	Distinct URLs	Engine breadth	Best position	Evidence
paperguide.ai	13	9	3	#1	Open source ↗
youtube.com	12	11	3	#1	Open source ↗
reddit.com	11	9	3	#2	Open source ↗
listenlabs.ai	10	5	2	#1	Open source ↗
atlasworkspace.ai	10	5	3	#2	Open source ↗
facebook.com	5	5	3	#1	Open source ↗
medium.com	5	5	3	#2	Open source ↗
linkedin.com	5	4	3	#2	Open source ↗
litmaps.com	4	1	2	#1	Open source ↗
scispace.com	3	3	2	#1	Open source ↗
arxiv.org	3	3	2	#2	Open source ↗
thesify.ai	3	2	2	#1	Open source ↗
hebbia.com	3	2	3	#2	Open source ↗
clarivate.com	3	1	1	#1	Open source ↗
infoguides.gmu.edu	3	1	3	#1	Open source ↗
studytexter.com	3	1	2	#1	Open source ↗
teach.its.uiowa.edu	3	1	2	#2	Open source ↗
cypris.ai	3	1	2	#4	Open source ↗
researchgate.net	2	2	2	#1	Open source ↗
sciencedirect.com	2	2	2	#1	Open source ↗

PUBLIC-BENCHMARK PRIVACY BOUNDARY

ai-research-assistants-2026-07-27 / 4-ai-research-assistants-2026-07-27-models-64232fd32583

Loading ranking table…

Most-cited domains in AI Research Assistants answers

Current rankings

Brand vs. market

Prompt × engine matrix

Sources shaping this filtered view

EXPLANATION UNAVAILABLE

Brand vs. market

Prompt × engine matrix

Sources shaping this filtered view